Ad is loading...
FTHFX vs UISCX
FTHFX vs UISCX Comparison
Open Charts FTHFX vs UISCX
FullerThaler Behavioral Sm-Cp Eq R6
Price$41.02
Change+$3.18 (+8.40%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets8.68B
Victory Small Cap Stock Institutional
Price$11.67
Change+$0.96 (+8.96%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets648.63M
FTHFX vs UISCX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FTHFX vs. UISCX commentary
Apr 11, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FTHFX is a Buy and UISCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FTHFX has more cash in the bank: 8.68B vs. UISCX (649M). UISCX pays higher dividends than FTHFX: UISCX (1.07) vs FTHFX (0.82). FTHFX was incepted earlier than UISCX: FTHFX (14 years) vs UISCX (17 years). UISCX (0.95) is less costly to investors than FTHFX (0.63). UISCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 62.00 vs. FTHFX (41.00). FTHFX (1000000) and UISCX (1000000) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. FTHFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -16.40 vs. UISCX (-22.92). FTHFX return over 5 years is better than : 77.25 vs. UISCX (-11.94).
| FTHFX | UISCX | FTHFX / UISCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 0.93 | 68% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 0.95 | 66% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 17 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -16.689 | -20.784 | 80% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 1000000 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 8.68B | 649M | 1,337% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.82 | 1.07 | 76% |
| Returns for 1 year | -16.40 | -22.92 | 72% |
| Returns for 3 years | 13.82 | -20.09 | -69% |
| Returns for 5 years | 77.25 | -11.94 | -647% |
| Returns for 10 years | 66.45 | -40.05 | -166% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers