Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FTHFX vs WBCRX
FTHFX vs WBCRX Comparison
Open Charts FTHFX vs WBCRX
FullerThaler Behavioral Sm-Cp Eq R6
Price$48.60
Change+$0.02 (+0.04%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets10.79B
William Blair Small-Mid Cap Core R6
Price$16.38
Change+$0.14 (+0.86%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets123.64M
FTHFX vs WBCRX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FTHFX vs. WBCRX commentary
Nov 20, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FTHFX is a Hold and WBCRX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FTHFX has more cash in the bank: 10.8B vs. WBCRX (124M). FTHFX pays higher dividends than WBCRX: FTHFX (0.70) vs WBCRX (0.16). FTHFX was incepted earlier than WBCRX: FTHFX (14 years) vs WBCRX (6 years). WBCRX (1.01) is less costly to investors than FTHFX (0.63). WBCRX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 59.00 vs. FTHFX (41.00). FTHFX (1000000) and WBCRX (1000000) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. FTHFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -5.11 vs. WBCRX (-6.09). FTHFX return over 5 years is better than : 79.21 vs. WBCRX (39.78).
| FTHFX | WBCRX | FTHFX / WBCRX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 0.90 | 70% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 1.01 | 62% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.957 | -3.191 | -218% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 1000000 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 10.8B | 124M | 8,710% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.70 | 0.16 | 454% |
| Returns for 1 year | -5.11 | -6.09 | 84% |
| Returns for 3 years | 36.76 | 19.03 | 193% |
| Returns for 5 years | 79.21 | 39.78 | 199% |
| Returns for 10 years | 159.87 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers