Ad is loading...
FTHFX vs WBCRX
FTHFX vs WBCRX Comparison
Open Charts FTHFX vs WBCRX
FullerThaler Behavioral Sm-Cp Eq R6
Price$40.07
Change-$0.42 (-1.04%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets9.25B
William Blair Small-Mid Cap Core R6
Price$14.65
Change-$0.15 (-1.01%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets103.91M
FTHFX vs WBCRX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FTHFX vs. WBCRX commentary
Apr 17, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FTHFX is a Buy and WBCRX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FTHFX has more cash in the bank: 9.25B vs. WBCRX (104M). FTHFX pays higher dividends than WBCRX: FTHFX (0.82) vs WBCRX (0.17). FTHFX was incepted earlier than WBCRX: FTHFX (14 years) vs WBCRX (6 years). WBCRX (1.01) is less costly to investors than FTHFX (0.63). WBCRX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 59.00 vs. FTHFX (41.00). FTHFX (1000000) and WBCRX (1000000) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. WBCRX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -1.38 vs. FTHFX (-6.85). FTHFX return over 5 years is better than : 95.40 vs. WBCRX (78.09).
| FTHFX | WBCRX | FTHFX / WBCRX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 0.90 | 70% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 1.01 | 62% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -10.854 | -12.530 | 87% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 1000000 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 9.25B | 104M | 8,898% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.82 | 0.17 | 486% |
| Returns for 1 year | -6.85 | -1.38 | 498% |
| Returns for 3 years | 21.05 | -3.37 | -625% |
| Returns for 5 years | 95.40 | 78.09 | 122% |
| Returns for 10 years | 80.32 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers