Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FTHFX vs WEMMX
FTHFX vs WEMMX Comparison
Open Charts FTHFX vs WEMMX
FullerThaler Behavioral Sm-Cp Eq R6
Price$48.60
Change+$0.02 (+0.04%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets10.79B
TETON Westwood Mighty Mites AAA
Price$13.26
Change-$0.08 (-0.60%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets178.93M
FTHFX vs WEMMX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FTHFX vs. WEMMX commentary
Nov 20, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FTHFX is a Hold and WEMMX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FTHFX has more cash in the bank: 10.8B vs. WEMMX (179M). FTHFX pays higher dividends than WEMMX: FTHFX (0.70) vs WEMMX (0.44). FTHFX was incepted earlier than WEMMX: FTHFX (14 years) vs WEMMX (28 years). WEMMX (1.50) is less costly to investors than FTHFX (0.63). FTHFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 41.00 vs. WEMMX (2.00). WEMMX has a lower initial minimum investment than FTHFX: WEMMX (1000) vs FTHFX (1000000). FTHFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -5.11 vs. WEMMX (-17.50). FTHFX return over 5 years is better than : 79.21 vs. WEMMX (-42.26).
| FTHFX | WEMMX | FTHFX / WEMMX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 1.50 | 42% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 1.50 | 42% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 28 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.957 | -15.524 | -45% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 1000 | 100,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 10.8B | 179M | 6,034% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.70 | 0.44 | 159% |
| Returns for 1 year | -5.11 | -17.50 | 29% |
| Returns for 3 years | 36.76 | -42.96 | -86% |
| Returns for 5 years | 79.21 | -42.26 | -187% |
| Returns for 10 years | 159.87 | -41.89 | -382% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement