Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FTHFX vs WICVX
FTHFX vs WICVX Comparison
Open Charts FTHFX vs WICVX
FullerThaler Behavioral Sm-Cp Eq R6
Price$50.16
Change-$0.57 (-1.12%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets11.24B
Wasatch Small Cap Value Institutional
Price$10.12
Change-$0.11 (-1.08%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.61B
FTHFX vs WICVX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FTHFX vs. WICVX commentary
Sep 15, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FTHFX is a Buy and WICVX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FTHFX has more cash in the bank: 11.2B vs. WICVX (1.61B). FTHFX pays higher dividends than WICVX: FTHFX (0.70) vs WICVX (0.17). FTHFX was incepted earlier than WICVX: FTHFX (14 years) vs WICVX (14 years). WICVX (1.06) is less costly to investors than FTHFX (0.63). WICVX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 69.00 vs. FTHFX (41.00). WICVX has a lower initial minimum investment than FTHFX: WICVX (100000) vs FTHFX (1000000). FTHFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.81 vs. WICVX (-10.14). FTHFX return over 5 years is better than : 109.07 vs. WICVX (43.56).
| FTHFX | WICVX | FTHFX / WICVX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 1.06 | 59% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 1.06 | 59% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 10.436 | 1.200 | 870% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 100000 | 1,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 11.2B | 1.61B | 696% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.70 | 0.17 | 424% |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.81 | -10.14 | -77% |
| Returns for 3 years | 54.55 | 21.10 | 259% |
| Returns for 5 years | 109.07 | 43.56 | 250% |
| Returns for 10 years | 177.47 | 66.00 | 269% |