Ad is loading...
FTHFX vs WICVX
FTHFX vs WICVX Comparison
Open Charts FTHFX vs WICVX
FullerThaler Behavioral Sm-Cp Eq R6
Price$47.34
Change+$0.10 (+0.21%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets10.65B
Wasatch Small Cap Value Institutional
Price$10.32
Change+$0.08 (+0.78%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.65B
FTHFX vs WICVX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FTHFX vs. WICVX commentary
Jan 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FTHFX is a Buy and WICVX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FTHFX has more cash in the bank: 10.6B vs. WICVX (1.65B). FTHFX pays higher dividends than WICVX: FTHFX (0.95) vs WICVX (0.00). FTHFX was incepted earlier than WICVX: FTHFX (13 years) vs WICVX (13 years). WICVX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 61.00 vs. FTHFX (35.00). WICVX has a lower initial minimum investment than FTHFX: WICVX (100000) vs FTHFX (1000000). FTHFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 14.58 vs. WICVX (4.62). FTHFX return over 5 years is better than : 75.76 vs. WICVX (25.30).
| FTHFX | WICVX | FTHFX / WICVX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Fund Existence | 13 years | 13 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.227 | 3.200 | 132% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 100000 | 1,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 10.6B | 1.65B | 642% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.95 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 14.58 | 4.62 | 316% |
| Returns for 3 years | 32.29 | 2.24 | 1,444% |
| Returns for 5 years | 75.76 | 25.30 | 299% |
| Returns for 10 years | 117.48 | 77.93 | 151% |