Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FTHFX vs WICVX
FTHFX vs WICVX Comparison
Open Charts FTHFX vs WICVX
FullerThaler Behavioral Sm-Cp Eq R6
Price$49.89
Change-$0.51 (-1.01%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets11.28B
Wasatch Small Cap Value Institutional
Price$9.89
Change-$0.17 (-1.69%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.61B
FTHFX vs WICVX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FTHFX vs. WICVX commentary
Oct 08, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FTHFX is a Hold and WICVX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FTHFX has more cash in the bank: 11.3B vs. WICVX (1.61B). FTHFX pays higher dividends than WICVX: FTHFX (0.69) vs WICVX (0.17). FTHFX was incepted earlier than WICVX: FTHFX (14 years) vs WICVX (14 years). WICVX (1.06) is less costly to investors than FTHFX (0.63). WICVX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 69.00 vs. FTHFX (41.00). WICVX has a lower initial minimum investment than FTHFX: WICVX (100000) vs FTHFX (1000000). FTHFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 3.35 vs. WICVX (-13.74). FTHFX return over 5 years is better than : 99.10 vs. WICVX (34.17).
| FTHFX | WICVX | FTHFX / WICVX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 1.06 | 59% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 1.06 | 59% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 10.964 | 0.600 | 1,827% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 100000 | 1,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 11.3B | 1.61B | 703% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.69 | 0.17 | 416% |
| Returns for 1 year | 3.35 | -13.74 | -24% |
| Returns for 3 years | 59.30 | 29.84 | 199% |
| Returns for 5 years | 99.10 | 34.17 | 290% |
| Returns for 10 years | 174.12 | 65.82 | 265% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement