Ad is loading...
FTHFX vs WICVX
FTHFX vs WICVX Comparison
Open Charts FTHFX vs WICVX
FullerThaler Behavioral Sm-Cp Eq R6
Price$40.75
Change+$0.41 (+1.02%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets9.18B
Wasatch Small Cap Value Institutional
Price$8.54
Change+$0.14 (+1.67%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.38B
FTHFX vs WICVX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FTHFX vs. WICVX commentary
Apr 25, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FTHFX is a Buy and WICVX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FTHFX has more cash in the bank: 9.18B vs. WICVX (1.38B). FTHFX pays higher dividends than WICVX: FTHFX (0.82) vs WICVX (0.18). FTHFX was incepted earlier than WICVX: FTHFX (14 years) vs WICVX (13 years). WICVX (1.06) is less costly to investors than FTHFX (0.63). WICVX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 61.00 vs. FTHFX (41.00). WICVX has a lower initial minimum investment than FTHFX: WICVX (100000) vs FTHFX (1000000). FTHFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -8.97 vs. WICVX (-20.10). FTHFX return over 5 years is better than : 97.43 vs. WICVX (57.47).
| FTHFX | WICVX | FTHFX / WICVX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 1.06 | 59% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 1.06 | 59% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 13 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -11.184 | -16.000 | 70% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 100000 | 1,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 9.18B | 1.38B | 667% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.82 | 0.18 | 448% |
| Returns for 1 year | -8.97 | -20.10 | 45% |
| Returns for 3 years | 21.34 | -7.95 | -268% |
| Returns for 5 years | 97.43 | 57.47 | 170% |
| Returns for 10 years | 76.65 | 31.60 | 243% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...