Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FTHFX vs WMMCX
FTHFX vs WMMCX Comparison
Open Charts FTHFX vs WMMCX
FullerThaler Behavioral Sm-Cp Eq R6
Price$47.19
Change-$0.19 (-0.40%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets10.69B
TETON Westwood Mighty Mites C
Price$12.31
Change-$0.05 (-0.40%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets197.4M
FTHFX vs WMMCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FTHFX vs. WMMCX commentary
Aug 08, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FTHFX is a Hold and WMMCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FTHFX has more cash in the bank: 10.7B vs. WMMCX (197M). FTHFX pays higher dividends than WMMCX: FTHFX (0.74) vs WMMCX (0.00). FTHFX was incepted earlier than WMMCX: FTHFX (14 years) vs WMMCX (24 years). WMMCX (2.25) is less costly to investors than FTHFX (0.63). FTHFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 41.00 vs. WMMCX (2.00). WMMCX has a lower initial minimum investment than FTHFX: WMMCX (1000) vs FTHFX (1000000). WMMCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 10.95 vs. FTHFX (7.11). FTHFX return over 5 years is better than : 86.53 vs. WMMCX (-34.87).
| FTHFX | WMMCX | FTHFX / WMMCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 2.25 | 28% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 2.25 | 28% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.315 | 4.216 | 102% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 1000 | 100,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 10.7B | 197M | 5,431% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.74 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.11 | 10.95 | 65% |
| Returns for 3 years | 38.98 | -31.82 | -122% |
| Returns for 5 years | 86.53 | -34.87 | -248% |
| Returns for 10 years | 149.10 | -40.61 | -367% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers