Ad is loading...
FTHFX vs WMMCX
FTHFX vs WMMCX Comparison
Open Charts FTHFX vs WMMCX
FullerThaler Behavioral Sm-Cp Eq R6
Price$41.02
Change+$3.18 (+8.40%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets8.68B
TETON Westwood Mighty Mites C
Price$10.54
Change+$0.61 (+6.14%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets182.58M
FTHFX vs WMMCX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FTHFX vs. WMMCX commentary
Apr 11, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FTHFX is a Buy and WMMCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FTHFX has more cash in the bank: 8.68B vs. WMMCX (183M). FTHFX pays higher dividends than WMMCX: FTHFX (0.82) vs WMMCX (0.00). FTHFX was incepted earlier than WMMCX: FTHFX (14 years) vs WMMCX (24 years). WMMCX (2.25) is less costly to investors than FTHFX (0.63). FTHFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 41.00 vs. WMMCX (2.00). WMMCX has a lower initial minimum investment than FTHFX: WMMCX (1000) vs FTHFX (1000000). FTHFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -16.40 vs. WMMCX (-32.77). FTHFX return over 5 years is better than : 77.25 vs. WMMCX (-36.54).
| FTHFX | WMMCX | FTHFX / WMMCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 2.25 | 28% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 2.25 | 28% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -16.689 | -16.273 | 103% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 1000 | 100,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 8.68B | 183M | 4,743% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.82 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -16.40 | -32.77 | 50% |
| Returns for 3 years | 13.82 | -46.29 | -30% |
| Returns for 5 years | 77.25 | -36.54 | -211% |
| Returns for 10 years | 66.45 | -54.26 | -122% |