Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FTHFX vs WMMCX
FTHFX vs WMMCX Comparison
Open Charts FTHFX vs WMMCX
FullerThaler Behavioral Sm-Cp Eq R6
Price$44.16
Change+$0.05 (+0.11%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets10.02B
TETON Westwood Mighty Mites C
Price$11.50
Change-$0.01 (-0.09%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets192.27M
FTHFX vs WMMCX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FTHFX vs. WMMCX commentary
Jun 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FTHFX is a Hold and WMMCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FTHFX has more cash in the bank: 10B vs. WMMCX (192M). FTHFX pays higher dividends than WMMCX: FTHFX (0.79) vs WMMCX (0.00). FTHFX was incepted earlier than WMMCX: FTHFX (14 years) vs WMMCX (24 years). WMMCX (2.25) is less costly to investors than FTHFX (0.63). FTHFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 41.00 vs. WMMCX (2.00). WMMCX has a lower initial minimum investment than FTHFX: WMMCX (1000) vs FTHFX (1000000). FTHFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -1.67 vs. WMMCX (-19.74). FTHFX return over 5 years is better than : 79.80 vs. WMMCX (-38.80).
| FTHFX | WMMCX | FTHFX / WMMCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 2.25 | 28% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 2.25 | 28% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -2.884 | -2.951 | 98% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 1000 | 100,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 10B | 192M | 5,208% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.79 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -1.67 | -19.74 | 8% |
| Returns for 3 years | 29.39 | -35.95 | -82% |
| Returns for 5 years | 79.80 | -38.80 | -206% |
| Returns for 10 years | 136.67 | -46.29 | -295% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement