Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FTHFX vs WMMCX
FTHFX vs WMMCX Comparison
Open Charts FTHFX vs WMMCX
FullerThaler Behavioral Sm-Cp Eq R6
Price$46.16
Change+$0.27 (+0.59%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets10.38B
TETON Westwood Mighty Mites C
Price$12.35
Change+$0.03 (+0.24%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets200.54M
FTHFX vs WMMCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FTHFX vs. WMMCX commentary
Jul 17, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FTHFX is a Buy and WMMCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FTHFX has more cash in the bank: 10.4B vs. WMMCX (201M). FTHFX pays higher dividends than WMMCX: FTHFX (0.76) vs WMMCX (0.00). FTHFX was incepted earlier than WMMCX: FTHFX (14 years) vs WMMCX (24 years). WMMCX (2.25) is less costly to investors than FTHFX (0.63). FTHFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 41.00 vs. WMMCX (2.00). WMMCX has a lower initial minimum investment than FTHFX: WMMCX (1000) vs FTHFX (1000000). FTHFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -3.83 vs. WMMCX (-19.63). FTHFX return over 5 years is better than : 92.20 vs. WMMCX (-29.85).
| FTHFX | WMMCX | FTHFX / WMMCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 2.25 | 28% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 2.25 | 28% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.035 | 3.879 | 27% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 1000 | 100,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 10.4B | 201M | 5,174% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.76 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -3.83 | -19.63 | 19% |
| Returns for 3 years | 44.47 | -26.20 | -170% |
| Returns for 5 years | 92.20 | -29.85 | -309% |
| Returns for 10 years | 140.44 | -42.67 | -329% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers