Ad is loading...
FTHFX vs WSCOX
FTHFX vs WSCOX Comparison
Open Charts FTHFX vs WSCOX
FullerThaler Behavioral Sm-Cp Eq R6
Price$44.90
Change+$0.01 (+0.02%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets10.16B
Allspring Disciplined Small Cap Inst
Price$12.71
Change-$0.10 (-0.78%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets95.37M
FTHFX vs WSCOX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FTHFX vs. WSCOX commentary
May 15, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FTHFX is a Buy and WSCOX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FTHFX has more cash in the bank: 10.2B vs. WSCOX (95.4M). FTHFX pays higher dividends than WSCOX: FTHFX (0.82) vs WSCOX (0.41). FTHFX was incepted earlier than WSCOX: FTHFX (14 years) vs WSCOX (11 years). WSCOX (1.39) is less costly to investors than FTHFX (0.63). WSCOX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 57.00 vs. FTHFX (41.00). FTHFX (1000000) and WSCOX (1000000) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. FTHFX (-2.22) and WSCOX (-2.31) have marching annual gain over last year. FTHFX return over 5 years is better than : 120.16 vs. WSCOX (100.50).
| FTHFX | WSCOX | FTHFX / WSCOX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 0.60 | 105% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 1.39 | 45% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -1.893 | -3.051 | 62% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 1000000 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 10.2B | 95.4M | 10,692% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.82 | 0.41 | 202% |
| Returns for 1 year | -2.22 | -2.31 | 96% |
| Returns for 3 years | 37.21 | 22.30 | 167% |
| Returns for 5 years | 120.16 | 100.50 | 120% |
| Returns for 10 years | 133.93 | -46.97 | -285% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...