Ad is loading...
FTHFX vs WWSMX
FTHFX vs WWSMX Comparison
Open Charts FTHFX vs WWSMX
FullerThaler Behavioral Sm-Cp Eq R6
Price$43.20
Change+$0.35 (+0.82%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets9.7B
Westwood Quality SMidCap Fund Ultra
Price$14.99
Change+$0.19 (+1.28%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets88.53M
FTHFX vs WWSMX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FTHFX vs. WWSMX commentary
May 09, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FTHFX is a Buy and WWSMX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FTHFX has more cash in the bank: 9.7B vs. WWSMX (88.5M). WWSMX pays higher dividends than FTHFX: WWSMX (1.67) vs FTHFX (0.82). FTHFX was incepted earlier than WWSMX: FTHFX (14 years) vs WWSMX (5 years). WWSMX (0.87) is less costly to investors than FTHFX (0.63). WWSMX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 73.00 vs. FTHFX (41.00). FTHFX (1000000) and WWSMX (1000000) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. WWSMX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -1.78 vs. FTHFX (-5.34).
| FTHFX | WWSMX | FTHFX / WWSMX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 0.70 | 90% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 0.87 | 72% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 5 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -5.658 | -6.388 | 89% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 1000000 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 9.7B | 88.5M | 10,963% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.82 | 1.67 | 49% |
| Returns for 1 year | -5.34 | -1.78 | 300% |
| Returns for 3 years | 33.91 | 23.18 | 146% |
| Returns for 5 years | 97.33 | N/A | - |
| Returns for 10 years | 127.18 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers