Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FTHFX vs WWSMX
FTHFX vs WWSMX Comparison
Open Charts FTHFX vs WWSMX
FullerThaler Behavioral Sm-Cp Eq R6
Price$50.04
Change-$0.12 (-0.24%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets11.31B
Westwood Quality SMidCap Fund Ultra
Price$17.11
Change-$0.02 (-0.12%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets100.71M
FTHFX vs WWSMX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FTHFX vs. WWSMX commentary
Sep 16, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FTHFX is a Hold and WWSMX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FTHFX has more cash in the bank: 11.3B vs. WWSMX (101M). WWSMX pays higher dividends than FTHFX: WWSMX (1.43) vs FTHFX (0.70). FTHFX was incepted earlier than WWSMX: FTHFX (14 years) vs WWSMX (5 years). WWSMX (0.87) is less costly to investors than FTHFX (0.63). WWSMX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 73.00 vs. FTHFX (41.00). FTHFX (1000000) and WWSMX (1000000) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. WWSMX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.74 vs. FTHFX (5.94). FTHFX return over 5 years is better than : 105.84 vs. WWSMX (52.00).
| FTHFX | WWSMX | FTHFX / WWSMX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 0.70 | 90% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 0.87 | 72% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 5 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 10.436 | 8.349 | 125% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 1000000 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 11.3B | 101M | 11,188% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.70 | 1.43 | 49% |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.94 | 9.74 | 61% |
| Returns for 3 years | 56.57 | 42.57 | 133% |
| Returns for 5 years | 105.84 | 52.00 | 204% |
| Returns for 10 years | 178.76 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement