Ad is loading...
FTHFX vs WWSMX
FTHFX vs WWSMX Comparison
Open Charts FTHFX vs WWSMX
FullerThaler Behavioral Sm-Cp Eq R6
Price$47.34
Change+$0.10 (+0.21%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets10.65B
Westwood Quality SMidCap Fund Ultra
Price$16.61
Change+$0.05 (+0.30%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets108.85M
FTHFX vs WWSMX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FTHFX vs. WWSMX commentary
Jan 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FTHFX is a Buy and WWSMX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FTHFX has more cash in the bank: 10.6B vs. WWSMX (109M). WWSMX pays higher dividends than FTHFX: WWSMX (1.03) vs FTHFX (0.95). FTHFX was incepted earlier than WWSMX: FTHFX (13 years) vs WWSMX (4 years). WWSMX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 87.00 vs. FTHFX (35.00). FTHFX (1000000) and WWSMX (1000000) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. WWSMX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 19.87 vs. FTHFX (14.58).
| FTHFX | WWSMX | FTHFX / WWSMX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Fund Existence | 13 years | 4 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.227 | 5.060 | 84% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 1000000 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 10.6B | 109M | 9,725% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.95 | 1.03 | 93% |
| Returns for 1 year | 14.58 | 19.87 | 73% |
| Returns for 3 years | 32.29 | 20.61 | 157% |
| Returns for 5 years | 75.76 | N/A | - |
| Returns for 10 years | 117.48 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers