Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FTHFX vs WWSMX
FTHFX vs WWSMX Comparison
Open Charts FTHFX vs WWSMX
FullerThaler Behavioral Sm-Cp Eq R6
Price$44.73
Change+$0.57 (+1.29%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets10.02B
Westwood Quality SMidCap Fund Ultra
Price$15.65
Change+$0.18 (+1.16%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets91.57M
FTHFX vs WWSMX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FTHFX vs. WWSMX commentary
Jun 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FTHFX is a StrongBuy and WWSMX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FTHFX has more cash in the bank: 10B vs. WWSMX (91.6M). WWSMX pays higher dividends than FTHFX: WWSMX (1.60) vs FTHFX (0.79). FTHFX was incepted earlier than WWSMX: FTHFX (14 years) vs WWSMX (5 years). WWSMX (0.87) is less costly to investors than FTHFX (0.63). WWSMX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 73.00 vs. FTHFX (41.00). FTHFX (1000000) and WWSMX (1000000) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. WWSMX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 4.10 vs. FTHFX (-0.90).
| FTHFX | WWSMX | FTHFX / WWSMX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 0.70 | 90% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 0.87 | 72% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 5 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -2.774 | -2.151 | 129% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 1000000 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 10B | 91.6M | 10,917% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.79 | 1.60 | 49% |
| Returns for 1 year | -0.90 | 4.10 | -22% |
| Returns for 3 years | 28.29 | 18.39 | 154% |
| Returns for 5 years | 80.01 | N/A | - |
| Returns for 10 years | 136.94 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement