Ad is loading...
FTINX vs HBLAX
FTINX vs HBLAX Comparison
Open Charts FTINX vs HBLAX
Fidelity Advisor Asset Manager 30% I
Price$11.65
Change+$0.27 (+2.37%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.95B
Hartford Balanced Income A
Price$14.02
Change+$0.36 (+2.64%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets11.26B
FTINX vs HBLAX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FTINX vs. HBLAX commentary
Apr 11, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FTINX is a Buy and HBLAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
HBLAX has more cash in the bank: 11.3B vs. FTINX (1.95B). HBLAX pays higher dividends than FTINX: HBLAX (3.37) vs FTINX (2.99). FTINX was incepted earlier than HBLAX: FTINX (18 years) vs HBLAX (19 years). HBLAX (0.89) is less costly to investors than FTINX (0.54). HBLAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 61.00 vs. FTINX (22.00). FTINX has a lower initial minimum investment than HBLAX: FTINX (0) vs HBLAX (2000). HBLAX IRA initial investment is lower compared to FTINX: HBLAX (2000) vs FTINX (500). FTINX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 0.63 vs. HBLAX (-1.74). FTINX return over 5 years is better than : 17.96 vs. HBLAX (13.46).
| FTINX | HBLAX | FTINX / HBLAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.54 | 0.89 | 61% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.54 | 0.89 | 61% |
| Fund Existence | 18 years | 19 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -3.303 | -2.817 | 117% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | 500 | 2000 | 25% |
| Net Assets | 1.95B | 11.3B | 17% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.99 | 3.37 | 89% |
| Returns for 1 year | 0.63 | -1.74 | -36% |
| Returns for 3 years | 2.39 | -1.08 | -222% |
| Returns for 5 years | 17.96 | 13.46 | 133% |
| Returns for 10 years | 26.51 | 25.85 | 103% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...