Ad is loading...
FTLAX vs MSNCX
FTLAX vs MSNCX Comparison
Open Charts FTLAX vs MSNCX
Nuveen LA Municipal Bond A
Price$10.24
Change-$0.02 (-0.19%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets223.67M
MFS NC Municipal Bond A
Price$10.50
Change-$0.02 (-0.19%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets451.12M
FTLAX vs MSNCX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FTLAX vs. MSNCX commentary
May 15, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FTLAX is a Hold and MSNCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MSNCX has more cash in the bank: 451M vs. FTLAX (224M). MSNCX (3.22) and FTLAX (3.09) have matching dividends . FTLAX was incepted earlier than MSNCX: FTLAX (36 years) vs MSNCX (41 years). MSNCX (0.86) and FTLAX (0.83) have similar cost to investors . MSNCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 25.00 vs. FTLAX (15.00). MSNCX (4%) and FTLAX (4%) have equivalent initial investment costs. MSNCX has a lower initial minimum investment than FTLAX: MSNCX (1000) vs FTLAX (2500). MSNCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 0.61 vs. FTLAX (-1.00). FTLAX return over 5 years is better than : 6.27 vs. MSNCX (4.74).
| FTLAX | MSNCX | FTLAX / MSNCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.83 | 0.84 | 99% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.83 | 0.86 | 97% |
| Fund Existence | 36 years | 41 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -1.570 | -1.736 | 90% |
| Front Load | 4% | 4% | 99% |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 1000 | 250% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 224M | 451M | 50% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.09 | 3.22 | 96% |
| Returns for 1 year | -1.00 | 0.61 | -164% |
| Returns for 3 years | 6.52 | 6.78 | 96% |
| Returns for 5 years | 6.27 | 4.74 | 132% |
| Returns for 10 years | 11.17 | 12.06 | 93% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...