FTLF
Price
$12.90
Change
-$0.37 (-2.79%)
Updated
Jul 25 closing price
Capitalization
109.28M
GPAGF
Price
$17.59
Change
+$0.50 (+2.93%)
Updated
Jul 17 closing price
Capitalization
6.91B
Interact to see
Advertisement

FTLF vs GPAGF

Header iconFTLF vs GPAGF Comparison
Open Charts FTLF vs GPAGFBanner chart's image
FitLife Brands
Price$12.90
Change-$0.37 (-2.79%)
Volume$8.32K
Capitalization109.28M
Gruma S.A.B. de CV
Price$17.59
Change+$0.50 (+2.93%)
Volume$280
Capitalization6.91B
FTLF vs GPAGF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
FTLF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
GPAGF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FTLF vs. GPAGF commentary
Jul 26, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FTLF is a Hold and GPAGF is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 26, 2025
Stock price -- (FTLF: $12.90 vs. GPAGF: $17.59)
Brand notoriety: FTLF and GPAGF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Food: Specialty/Candy industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FTLF: 35% vs. GPAGF: 29%
Market capitalization -- FTLF: $109.28M vs. GPAGF: $6.91B
FTLF [@Food: Specialty/Candy] is valued at $109.28M. GPAGF’s [@Food: Specialty/Candy] market capitalization is $6.91B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Food: Specialty/Candy] industry ranges from $327.81B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Food: Specialty/Candy] industry is $9.57B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FTLF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileGPAGF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • FTLF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • GPAGF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, GPAGF is a better buy in the long-term than FTLF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FTLF’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while GPAGF’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • FTLF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • GPAGF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, GPAGF is a better buy in the short-term than FTLF.

Price Growth

FTLF (@Food: Specialty/Candy) experienced а +1.26% price change this week, while GPAGF (@Food: Specialty/Candy) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Food: Specialty/Candy industry was +2.12%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +9.52%, and the average quarterly price growth was +10.96%.

Reported Earning Dates

FTLF is expected to report earnings on May 15, 2025.

GPAGF is expected to report earnings on Apr 24, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Food: Specialty/Candy (+2.12% weekly)

A specialty/candy manufacturer specializes in one or more of the following: chocolate, candies, pasta, condiments, seasonings, among other items. Hershey Company, McCormick & Company and J.M. Smucker Company are some of the major firms in this segment. Demand for this industry’s products comes from both institutions/restaurants as well as households.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GPAGF($6.91B) has a higher market cap than FTLF($109M). FTLF has higher P/E ratio than GPAGF: FTLF (22.68) vs GPAGF (16.68). GPAGF YTD gains are higher at: 9.969 vs. FTLF (-20.859). GPAGF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 727M vs. FTLF (6.66M). GPAGF has more cash in the bank: 239M vs. FTLF (7.34M). FTLF has less debt than GPAGF: FTLF (11.4M) vs GPAGF (1.71B). GPAGF has higher revenues than FTLF: GPAGF (5B) vs FTLF (44.8M).
FTLFGPAGFFTLF / GPAGF
Capitalization109M6.91B2%
EBITDA6.66M727M1%
Gain YTD-20.8599.969-209%
P/E Ratio22.6816.68136%
Revenue44.8M5B1%
Total Cash7.34M239M3%
Total Debt11.4M1.71B1%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FTLF vs GPAGF: Fundamental Ratings
FTLF
GPAGF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
2337
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
77
Overvalued
62
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
2640
SMR RATING
1..100
3734
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
6262
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
9182
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

GPAGF's Valuation (62) in the null industry is in the same range as FTLF (77). This means that GPAGF’s stock grew similarly to FTLF’s over the last 12 months.

FTLF's Profit vs Risk Rating (26) in the null industry is in the same range as GPAGF (40). This means that FTLF’s stock grew similarly to GPAGF’s over the last 12 months.

GPAGF's SMR Rating (34) in the null industry is in the same range as FTLF (37). This means that GPAGF’s stock grew similarly to FTLF’s over the last 12 months.

GPAGF's Price Growth Rating (62) in the null industry is in the same range as FTLF (62). This means that GPAGF’s stock grew similarly to FTLF’s over the last 12 months.

GPAGF's P/E Growth Rating (82) in the null industry is in the same range as FTLF (91). This means that GPAGF’s stock grew similarly to FTLF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FTLFGPAGF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
68%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
50%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
64%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
58%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
72%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
52%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
64%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
51%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
63%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
49%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
63%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
39%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
69%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
65%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
68%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
48%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
FTLF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
GPAGF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
SCCR25.460.08
+0.33%
Schwab® Core Bond ETF
BYM10.390.03
+0.29%
BLACKROCK Municipal Income QUALITY TRUST
IQDY33.420.05
+0.15%
FlexShares Intl Qual Div Dynamic ETF
JHDV38.43N/A
N/A
JHancock U.S. High Dividend ETF
UNIY48.62N/A
N/A
WisdomTree Voya Yld Enh USD Unvsl Bd Fd

FTLF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that FTLF and FARM have been poorly correlated (+24% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that FTLF and FARM's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FTLF
1D Price
Change %
FTLF100%
-2.79%
FARM - FTLF
24%
Poorly correlated
+0.57%
BRBR - FTLF
23%
Poorly correlated
+1.46%
BYND - FTLF
21%
Poorly correlated
-5.45%
MKC - FTLF
20%
Poorly correlated
+0.17%
DAR - FTLF
20%
Poorly correlated
-2.50%
More

GPAGF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, GPAGF has been loosely correlated with FAMI. These tickers have moved in lockstep 47% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if GPAGF jumps, then FAMI could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To GPAGF
1D Price
Change %
GPAGF100%
N/A
FAMI - GPAGF
47%
Loosely correlated
-2.12%
HLNFF - GPAGF
5%
Poorly correlated
N/A
GRBMF - GPAGF
4%
Poorly correlated
+12.67%
FPAFY - GPAGF
3%
Poorly correlated
+2.24%
FTLF - GPAGF
0%
Poorly correlated
-2.79%
More