FTMDF
Price
$0.07
Change
-$0.01 (-12.50%)
Updated
Oct 17 closing price
Capitalization
37.85M
Intraday Buy/Sell Signals
FWEDF
Price
$2.21
Change
-$0.07 (-3.07%)
Updated
Oct 17 closing price
Capitalization
463.46M
Intraday Buy/Sell Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

FTMDF vs FWEDF

Header iconFTMDF vs FWEDF Comparison
Open Charts FTMDF vs FWEDFBanner chart's image
Fortune Minerals
Price$0.07
Change-$0.01 (-12.50%)
Volume$776.76K
Capitalization37.85M
Fireweed Metals
Price$2.21
Change-$0.07 (-3.07%)
Volume$90.02K
Capitalization463.46M
FTMDF vs FWEDF Comparison Chart in %
FTMDF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
FWEDF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FTMDF vs. FWEDF commentary
Oct 18, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FTMDF is a Hold and FWEDF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Oct 18, 2025
Stock price -- (FTMDF: $0.07 vs. FWEDF: $2.21)
Brand notoriety: FTMDF and FWEDF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Other Metals/Minerals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FTMDF: 447% vs. FWEDF: 192%
Market capitalization -- FTMDF: $37.85M vs. FWEDF: $463.46M
FTMDF [@Other Metals/Minerals] is valued at $37.85M. FWEDF’s [@Other Metals/Minerals] market capitalization is $463.46M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry ranges from $223.12B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry is $2.65B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FTMDF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileFWEDF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • FTMDF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • FWEDF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, FWEDF is a better buy in the long-term than FTMDF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FTMDF’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while FWEDF’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • FTMDF’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • FWEDF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, FTMDF is a better buy in the short-term than FWEDF.

Price Growth

FTMDF (@Other Metals/Minerals) experienced а +20.00% price change this week, while FWEDF (@Other Metals/Minerals) price change was +1.05% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Other Metals/Minerals industry was +3.05%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +27.21%, and the average quarterly price growth was +253.12%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Other Metals/Minerals (+3.05% weekly)

The category includes companies that explore for, mine and extract metals, such as copper, diamonds, nickel, cobalt ore, lead, zinc and uranium. BHP, Rio Tinto and Southern Copper Corporation are major players in this space.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FWEDF($463M) has a higher market cap than FTMDF($37.8M). FWEDF YTD gains are higher at: 127.629 vs. FTMDF (105.128). FTMDF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): -3.43M vs. FWEDF (-34.74M). FWEDF has more cash in the bank: 63.6M vs. FTMDF (462K). FWEDF has less debt than FTMDF: FWEDF (181K) vs FTMDF (12.6M). FTMDF (0) and FWEDF (0) have equivalent revenues.
FTMDFFWEDFFTMDF / FWEDF
Capitalization37.8M463M8%
EBITDA-3.43M-34.74M10%
Gain YTD105.128127.62982%
P/E RatioN/AN/A-
Revenue00-
Total Cash462K63.6M1%
Total Debt12.6M181K6,961%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FTMDF vs FWEDF: Fundamental Ratings
FTMDF
FWEDF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
8871
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
94
Overvalued
62
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
8713
SMR RATING
1..100
100100
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3938
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
48100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
4785

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

FWEDF's Valuation (62) in the null industry is in the same range as FTMDF (94). This means that FWEDF’s stock grew similarly to FTMDF’s over the last 12 months.

FWEDF's Profit vs Risk Rating (13) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for FTMDF (87). This means that FWEDF’s stock grew significantly faster than FTMDF’s over the last 12 months.

FWEDF's SMR Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as FTMDF (100). This means that FWEDF’s stock grew similarly to FTMDF’s over the last 12 months.

FWEDF's Price Growth Rating (38) in the null industry is in the same range as FTMDF (39). This means that FWEDF’s stock grew similarly to FTMDF’s over the last 12 months.

FTMDF's P/E Growth Rating (48) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FWEDF (100). This means that FTMDF’s stock grew somewhat faster than FWEDF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FTMDFFWEDF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
89%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
76%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
59%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
85%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
82%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
84%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
80%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
85%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
81%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
86%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
79%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
84%
Bullish Trend 27 days ago
79%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 9 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 9 days ago
69%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
74%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
83%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
84%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
FTMDF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
FWEDF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
NYVCX20.840.07
+0.34%
Davis NY Venture C
GINNX66.870.18
+0.27%
Guinness Atkinson™ Global Inntrs Instl
RYECX190.73N/A
N/A
Rydex Energy C
VEUAX39.47N/A
N/A
JPMorgan Europe Dynamic A
MUIFX34.14N/A
N/A
Nationwide Institutional Service

FTMDF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that FTMDF and KCCFF have been poorly correlated (+20% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that FTMDF and KCCFF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FTMDF
1D Price
Change %
FTMDF100%
-8.86%
KCCFF - FTMDF
20%
Poorly correlated
-4.67%
AGXPF - FTMDF
20%
Poorly correlated
-8.39%
FSUGY - FTMDF
9%
Poorly correlated
+2.06%
GARWF - FTMDF
8%
Poorly correlated
-14.25%
FWEDF - FTMDF
7%
Poorly correlated
-3.16%
More

FWEDF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that FWEDF and IVPAF have been poorly correlated (+28% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that FWEDF and IVPAF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FWEDF
1D Price
Change %
FWEDF100%
-3.16%
IVPAF - FWEDF
28%
Poorly correlated
-5.73%
EEMMF - FWEDF
21%
Poorly correlated
-7.48%
ABAT - FWEDF
21%
Poorly correlated
-14.46%
MTRN - FWEDF
21%
Poorly correlated
+0.80%
TSKFF - FWEDF
20%
Poorly correlated
-7.69%
More