FTMDF
Price
$0.07
Change
-$0.01 (-14.29%)
Updated
Aug 15 closing price
Capitalization
31.17M
FWEDF
Price
$1.92
Change
+$0.12 (+6.67%)
Updated
Aug 15 closing price
Capitalization
403.34M
Interact to see
Advertisement

FTMDF vs FWEDF

Header iconFTMDF vs FWEDF Comparison
Open Charts FTMDF vs FWEDFBanner chart's image
Fortune Minerals
Price$0.07
Change-$0.01 (-14.29%)
Volume$6.03K
Capitalization31.17M
Fireweed Metals
Price$1.92
Change+$0.12 (+6.67%)
Volume$34.31K
Capitalization403.34M
FTMDF vs FWEDF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
FTMDF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
FWEDF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FTMDF vs. FWEDF commentary
Aug 16, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FTMDF is a Hold and FWEDF is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 16, 2025
Stock price -- (FTMDF: $0.06 vs. FWEDF: $1.92)
Brand notoriety: FTMDF and FWEDF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Other Metals/Minerals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FTMDF: 8% vs. FWEDF: 158%
Market capitalization -- FTMDF: $31.17M vs. FWEDF: $403.34M
FTMDF [@Other Metals/Minerals] is valued at $31.17M. FWEDF’s [@Other Metals/Minerals] market capitalization is $403.34M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry ranges from $223.12B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry is $2.26B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FTMDF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileFWEDF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • FTMDF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • FWEDF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, FWEDF is a better buy in the long-term than FTMDF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FTMDF’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while FWEDF’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • FTMDF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • FWEDF’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, FWEDF is a better buy in the short-term than FTMDF.

Price Growth

FTMDF (@Other Metals/Minerals) experienced а +20.37% price change this week, while FWEDF (@Other Metals/Minerals) price change was +9.28% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Other Metals/Minerals industry was +2.12%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +7.77%, and the average quarterly price growth was +107.24%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Other Metals/Minerals (+2.12% weekly)

The category includes companies that explore for, mine and extract metals, such as copper, diamonds, nickel, cobalt ore, lead, zinc and uranium. BHP, Rio Tinto and Southern Copper Corporation are major players in this space.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FWEDF($403M) has a higher market cap than FTMDF($31.2M). FWEDF YTD gains are higher at: 97.938 vs. FTMDF (85.185). FTMDF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): -2.75M vs. FWEDF (-33.76M). FWEDF has more cash in the bank: 14.4M vs. FTMDF (1.09M). FWEDF has less debt than FTMDF: FWEDF (195K) vs FTMDF (12.6M). FTMDF (0) and FWEDF (0) have equivalent revenues.
FTMDFFWEDFFTMDF / FWEDF
Capitalization31.2M403M8%
EBITDA-2.75M-33.76M8%
Gain YTD85.18597.93887%
P/E RatioN/AN/A-
Revenue00-
Total Cash1.09M14.4M8%
Total Debt12.6M195K6,462%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FTMDF vs FWEDF: Fundamental Ratings
FTMDF
FWEDF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
823
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
94
Overvalued
61
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
9515
SMR RATING
1..100
9498
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3840
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
51100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a49

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

FWEDF's Valuation (61) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FTMDF (94). This means that FWEDF’s stock grew somewhat faster than FTMDF’s over the last 12 months.

FWEDF's Profit vs Risk Rating (15) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for FTMDF (95). This means that FWEDF’s stock grew significantly faster than FTMDF’s over the last 12 months.

FTMDF's SMR Rating (94) in the null industry is in the same range as FWEDF (98). This means that FTMDF’s stock grew similarly to FWEDF’s over the last 12 months.

FTMDF's Price Growth Rating (38) in the null industry is in the same range as FWEDF (40). This means that FTMDF’s stock grew similarly to FWEDF’s over the last 12 months.

FTMDF's P/E Growth Rating (51) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FWEDF (100). This means that FTMDF’s stock grew somewhat faster than FWEDF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FTMDFFWEDF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
83%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
76%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
89%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
80%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
82%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
85%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
81%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
71%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
84%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
79%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 9 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 18 days ago
68%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
83%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
70%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
FTMDF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
FWEDF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
GLPCX31.05N/A
N/A
Goldman Sachs MLP Energy Infras C
NSBRX65.42N/A
N/A
Nuveen Dividend Growth I
VSSVX11.02N/A
N/A
VALIC Company I Small Cap Special Val
GFFDX87.87N/A
N/A
Invesco Global Focus R5
NEQCX12.45N/A
N/A
Neuberger Berman U.S. Equity Impact C

FTMDF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that FTMDF and KCCFF have been poorly correlated (+20% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that FTMDF and KCCFF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FTMDF
1D Price
Change %
FTMDF100%
-0.33%
KCCFF - FTMDF
20%
Poorly correlated
-1.02%
AGXPF - FTMDF
20%
Poorly correlated
-1.01%
FSUGY - FTMDF
9%
Poorly correlated
+0.40%
GARWF - FTMDF
8%
Poorly correlated
+2.86%
FWEDF - FTMDF
7%
Poorly correlated
+6.79%
More

FWEDF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that FWEDF and IVPAF have been poorly correlated (+28% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that FWEDF and IVPAF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FWEDF
1D Price
Change %
FWEDF100%
+6.79%
IVPAF - FWEDF
28%
Poorly correlated
+0.41%
EEMMF - FWEDF
21%
Poorly correlated
+1.89%
ABAT - FWEDF
21%
Poorly correlated
+1.84%
MTRN - FWEDF
21%
Poorly correlated
-0.67%
TSKFF - FWEDF
20%
Poorly correlated
-1.75%
More