FTMDF
Price
$0.06
Change
-$0.01 (-14.29%)
Updated
Jul 25 closing price
Capitalization
15.88M
GARWF
Price
$0.04
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Jul 25 closing price
Capitalization
8.25M
Interact to see
Advertisement

FTMDF vs GARWF

Header iconFTMDF vs GARWF Comparison
Open Charts FTMDF vs GARWFBanner chart's image
Fortune Minerals
Price$0.06
Change-$0.01 (-14.29%)
Volume$16.03K
Capitalization15.88M
Golden Arrow Resource
Price$0.04
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$699
Capitalization8.25M
FTMDF vs GARWF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
FTMDF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
GARWF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FTMDF vs. GARWF commentary
Jul 27, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FTMDF is a Hold and GARWF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 27, 2025
Stock price -- (FTMDF: $0.06 vs. GARWF: $0.04)
Brand notoriety: FTMDF and GARWF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Other Metals/Minerals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FTMDF: 22% vs. GARWF: 2%
Market capitalization -- FTMDF: $15.88M vs. GARWF: $8.25M
FTMDF [@Other Metals/Minerals] is valued at $15.88M. GARWF’s [@Other Metals/Minerals] market capitalization is $8.25M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry ranges from $223.12B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry is $3.14B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FTMDF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileGARWF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • FTMDF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • GARWF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, GARWF is a better buy in the long-term than FTMDF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FTMDF’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while GARWF’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • FTMDF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • GARWF’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, both FTMDF and GARWF are a good buy in the short-term.

Price Growth

FTMDF (@Other Metals/Minerals) experienced а -10.56% price change this week, while GARWF (@Other Metals/Minerals) price change was -15.60% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Other Metals/Minerals industry was +2.12%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +15.12%, and the average quarterly price growth was +34.73%.

Reported Earning Dates

GARWF is expected to report earnings on Apr 29, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Other Metals/Minerals (+2.12% weekly)

The category includes companies that explore for, mine and extract metals, such as copper, diamonds, nickel, cobalt ore, lead, zinc and uranium. BHP, Rio Tinto and Southern Copper Corporation are major players in this space.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FTMDF($15.9M) has a higher market cap than GARWF($8.25M). FTMDF YTD gains are higher at: 75.214 vs. GARWF (26.917). GARWF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): -6.69M vs. FTMDF (-31.73M). GARWF has more cash in the bank: 4.17M vs. FTMDF (137K). GARWF has less debt than FTMDF: GARWF (402K) vs FTMDF (8.61M). FTMDF (0) and GARWF (0) have equivalent revenues.
FTMDFGARWFFTMDF / GARWF
Capitalization15.9M8.25M193%
EBITDA-31.73M-6.69M474%
Gain YTD75.21426.917279%
P/E Ratio256.41N/A-
Revenue00-
Total Cash137K4.17M3%
Total Debt8.61M402K2,143%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FTMDF vs GARWF: Fundamental Ratings
FTMDF
GARWF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
8129
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
93
Overvalued
41
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
90100
SMR RATING
1..100
9398
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3746
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
5473
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

GARWF's Valuation (41) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FTMDF (93). This means that GARWF’s stock grew somewhat faster than FTMDF’s over the last 12 months.

FTMDF's Profit vs Risk Rating (90) in the null industry is in the same range as GARWF (100). This means that FTMDF’s stock grew similarly to GARWF’s over the last 12 months.

FTMDF's SMR Rating (93) in the null industry is in the same range as GARWF (98). This means that FTMDF’s stock grew similarly to GARWF’s over the last 12 months.

FTMDF's Price Growth Rating (37) in the null industry is in the same range as GARWF (46). This means that FTMDF’s stock grew similarly to GARWF’s over the last 12 months.

FTMDF's P/E Growth Rating (54) in the null industry is in the same range as GARWF (73). This means that FTMDF’s stock grew similarly to GARWF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FTMDFGARWF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
88%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
78%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
87%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
87%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
74%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 20 days ago
84%
Bullish Trend 9 days ago
74%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
82%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
87%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
82%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
FTMDF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
GARWF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
OTPBF50.00N/A
N/A
OTP Bank Ltd.
MCHT7.00N/A
N/A
Mauch Chunk Trust Financial Corp.
PPAAF0.10N/A
N/A
PT Perusahaan Gas Negara Persaro
PROBF1.68-0.06
-3.64%
PROBE GOLD INC
LILMF0.03-0.01
-24.24%
Lilium N.V.

FTMDF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that FTMDF and KCCFF have been poorly correlated (+20% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that FTMDF and KCCFF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FTMDF
1D Price
Change %
FTMDF100%
-12.14%
KCCFF - FTMDF
20%
Poorly correlated
+5.02%
AGXPF - FTMDF
20%
Poorly correlated
-0.23%
QCCUF - FTMDF
20%
Poorly correlated
+0.16%
FSUGY - FTMDF
9%
Poorly correlated
-3.12%
GARWF - FTMDF
8%
Poorly correlated
+5.76%
More

GARWF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that GARWF and FSUMF have been poorly correlated (+14% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that GARWF and FSUMF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To GARWF
1D Price
Change %
GARWF100%
+5.76%
FSUMF - GARWF
14%
Poorly correlated
-1.81%
FWEDF - GARWF
9%
Poorly correlated
-2.99%
GCRIF - GARWF
8%
Poorly correlated
N/A
FTMDF - GARWF
8%
Poorly correlated
-12.14%
GCCFF - GARWF
5%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More