FTMDF
Price
$0.04
Change
-$0.01 (-20.00%)
Updated
Apr 24 closing price
Capitalization
15.88M
GARWF
Price
$0.04
Change
+$0.01 (+33.33%)
Updated
Apr 24 closing price
Capitalization
8.25M
Ad is loading...

FTMDF vs GARWF

Header iconFTMDF vs GARWF Comparison
Open Charts FTMDF vs GARWFBanner chart's image
Fortune Minerals
Price$0.04
Change-$0.01 (-20.00%)
Volume$12.4K
Capitalization15.88M
Golden Arrow Resource
Price$0.04
Change+$0.01 (+33.33%)
Volume$6K
Capitalization8.25M
FTMDF vs GARWF Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FTMDF vs. GARWF commentary
Apr 26, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FTMDF is a Hold and GARWF is a Hold.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Apr 26, 2025
Stock price -- (FTMDF: $0.05 vs. GARWF: $0.04)
Brand notoriety: FTMDF and GARWF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Other Metals/Minerals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FTMDF: 3% vs. GARWF: 42%
Market capitalization -- FTMDF: $15.88M vs. GARWF: $8.25M
FTMDF [@Other Metals/Minerals] is valued at $15.88M. GARWF’s [@Other Metals/Minerals] market capitalization is $8.25M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry ranges from $223.12B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry is $3.15B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FTMDF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileGARWF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • FTMDF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • GARWF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, FTMDF is a better buy in the long-term than GARWF.

Price Growth

FTMDF (@Other Metals/Minerals) experienced а -8.63% price change this week, while GARWF (@Other Metals/Minerals) price change was +33.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Other Metals/Minerals industry was +1.82%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +3.17%, and the average quarterly price growth was +5.85%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Other Metals/Minerals (+1.82% weekly)

The category includes companies that explore for, mine and extract metals, such as copper, diamonds, nickel, cobalt ore, lead, zinc and uranium. BHP, Rio Tinto and Southern Copper Corporation are major players in this space.

FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FTMDF($15.9M) has a higher market cap than GARWF($8.25M). FTMDF YTD gains are higher at: 32.764 vs. GARWF (20.000). GARWF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): -6.69M vs. FTMDF (-31.73M). GARWF has more cash in the bank: 4.17M vs. FTMDF (137K). GARWF has less debt than FTMDF: GARWF (402K) vs FTMDF (8.61M). FTMDF (0) and GARWF (0) have equivalent revenues.
FTMDFGARWFFTMDF / GARWF
Capitalization15.9M8.25M193%
EBITDA-31.73M-6.69M474%
Gain YTD32.76420.000164%
P/E Ratio256.41N/A-
Revenue00-
Total Cash137K4.17M3%
Total Debt8.61M402K2,143%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FTMDF vs GARWF: Fundamental Ratings
FTMDF
GARWF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
6454
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
94
Overvalued
62
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
92100
SMR RATING
1..100
9296
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3759
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
4465
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
8550

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

GARWF's Valuation (62) in the null industry is in the same range as FTMDF (94). This means that GARWF’s stock grew similarly to FTMDF’s over the last 12 months.

FTMDF's Profit vs Risk Rating (92) in the null industry is in the same range as GARWF (100). This means that FTMDF’s stock grew similarly to GARWF’s over the last 12 months.

FTMDF's SMR Rating (92) in the null industry is in the same range as GARWF (96). This means that FTMDF’s stock grew similarly to GARWF’s over the last 12 months.

FTMDF's Price Growth Rating (37) in the null industry is in the same range as GARWF (59). This means that FTMDF’s stock grew similarly to GARWF’s over the last 12 months.

FTMDF's P/E Growth Rating (44) in the null industry is in the same range as GARWF (65). This means that FTMDF’s stock grew similarly to GARWF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
RSI
ODDS (%)
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Momentum
ODDS (%)
MACD
ODDS (%)
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Advances
ODDS (%)
Declines
ODDS (%)
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Aroon
ODDS (%)
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
BFK9.700.16
+1.68%
BlackRock Municipal Income Trust
LQIG94.490.58
+0.61%
SPDR MarketAxess Inv Grd 400 Corp Bd ETF
SPE14.480.04
+0.24%
Special Opportunities Fund
STEW16.950.04
+0.24%
SRH Total Return Fund
SYNB26.15N/A
N/A
Putnam BioRevolution ETF

FTMDF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that FTMDF and KCCFF have been poorly correlated (+20% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that FTMDF and KCCFF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FTMDF
1D Price
Change %
FTMDF100%
+6.42%
KCCFF - FTMDF
20%
Poorly correlated
+0.41%
AGXPF - FTMDF
20%
Poorly correlated
-2.35%
QCCUF - FTMDF
20%
Poorly correlated
+5.53%
FSUGY - FTMDF
9%
Poorly correlated
N/A
GARWF - FTMDF
8%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

GARWF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that GARWF and FSUMF have been poorly correlated (+14% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that GARWF and FSUMF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To GARWF
1D Price
Change %
GARWF100%
N/A
FSUMF - GARWF
14%
Poorly correlated
+0.89%
FWEDF - GARWF
9%
Poorly correlated
-0.38%
GCRIF - GARWF
8%
Poorly correlated
N/A
FTMDF - GARWF
8%
Poorly correlated
+6.42%
GCCFF - GARWF
5%
Poorly correlated
+8.11%
More