FTMDF
Price
$0.05
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Sep 5 closing price
Capitalization
30.43M
KCCFF
Price
$0.13
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Sep 5 closing price
Capitalization
21.29M
Interact to see
Advertisement

FTMDF vs KCCFF

Header iconFTMDF vs KCCFF Comparison
Open Charts FTMDF vs KCCFFBanner chart's image
Fortune Minerals
Price$0.05
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$440.5K
Capitalization30.43M
Kutcho Copper
Price$0.13
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$12K
Capitalization21.29M
FTMDF vs KCCFF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
FTMDF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
KCCFF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FTMDF vs. KCCFF commentary
Sep 06, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FTMDF is a Hold and KCCFF is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 06, 2025
Stock price -- (FTMDF: $0.05 vs. KCCFF: $0.13)
Brand notoriety: FTMDF and KCCFF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Other Metals/Minerals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FTMDF: 618% vs. KCCFF: 18%
Market capitalization -- FTMDF: $30.43M vs. KCCFF: $21.29M
FTMDF [@Other Metals/Minerals] is valued at $30.43M. KCCFF’s [@Other Metals/Minerals] market capitalization is $21.29M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry ranges from $223.12B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry is $2.28B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FTMDF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileKCCFF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • FTMDF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • KCCFF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, KCCFF is a better buy in the long-term than FTMDF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FTMDF’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while KCCFF’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • FTMDF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 7 bearish.
  • KCCFF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, KCCFF is a better buy in the short-term than FTMDF.

Price Growth

FTMDF (@Other Metals/Minerals) experienced а -9.75% price change this week, while KCCFF (@Other Metals/Minerals) price change was +7.08% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Other Metals/Minerals industry was +4.20%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +9.26%, and the average quarterly price growth was +121.89%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Other Metals/Minerals (+4.20% weekly)

The category includes companies that explore for, mine and extract metals, such as copper, diamonds, nickel, cobalt ore, lead, zinc and uranium. BHP, Rio Tinto and Southern Copper Corporation are major players in this space.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FTMDF($30.4M) has a higher market cap than KCCFF($21.3M). KCCFF YTD gains are higher at: 94.992 vs. FTMDF (45.014). KCCFF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 3.46M vs. FTMDF (-2.75M). FTMDF has more cash in the bank: 1.09M vs. KCCFF (524K). FTMDF (0) and KCCFF (0) have equivalent revenues.
FTMDFKCCFFFTMDF / KCCFF
Capitalization30.4M21.3M143%
EBITDA-2.75M3.46M-80%
Gain YTD45.01494.99247%
P/E RatioN/AN/A-
Revenue00-
Total Cash1.09M524K209%
Total Debt12.6MN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FTMDF vs KCCFF: Fundamental Ratings
FTMDF
KCCFF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5584
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
95
Overvalued
30
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100100
SMR RATING
1..100
9594
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4341
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
51100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

KCCFF's Valuation (30) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FTMDF (95). This means that KCCFF’s stock grew somewhat faster than FTMDF’s over the last 12 months.

KCCFF's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as FTMDF (100). This means that KCCFF’s stock grew similarly to FTMDF’s over the last 12 months.

KCCFF's SMR Rating (94) in the null industry is in the same range as FTMDF (95). This means that KCCFF’s stock grew similarly to FTMDF’s over the last 12 months.

KCCFF's Price Growth Rating (41) in the null industry is in the same range as FTMDF (43). This means that KCCFF’s stock grew similarly to FTMDF’s over the last 12 months.

FTMDF's P/E Growth Rating (51) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for KCCFF (100). This means that FTMDF’s stock grew somewhat faster than KCCFF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FTMDFKCCFF
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
75%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
89%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
81%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
87%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 23 days ago
84%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
84%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Bearish Trend 9 days ago
87%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
88%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
85%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
FTMDF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
KCCFF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
PNDRY16.840.11
+0.66%
Pandora A/S
PDER291.001.00
+0.34%
Pardee Resources Co.
TVAHF18.04N/A
N/A
TV Asahi Holdings Corp.
GRWTF16.00N/A
N/A
Great West Lifeco, Inc.
RVXCF0.07-0.01
-9.19%
Resverlogix Corp.

FTMDF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that FTMDF and KCCFF have been poorly correlated (+20% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that FTMDF and KCCFF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FTMDF
1D Price
Change %
FTMDF100%
-5.04%
KCCFF - FTMDF
20%
Poorly correlated
-1.61%
AGXPF - FTMDF
20%
Poorly correlated
+12.07%
FSUGY - FTMDF
9%
Poorly correlated
+0.15%
GARWF - FTMDF
8%
Poorly correlated
+4.23%
FWEDF - FTMDF
7%
Poorly correlated
+1.42%
More

KCCFF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that KCCFF and POROF have been poorly correlated (+21% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that KCCFF and POROF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To KCCFF
1D Price
Change %
KCCFF100%
-1.61%
POROF - KCCFF
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
VZLA - KCCFF
20%
Poorly correlated
+2.76%
FURY - KCCFF
20%
Poorly correlated
+3.83%
LYSCF - KCCFF
20%
Poorly correlated
-2.55%
FTMDF - KCCFF
20%
Poorly correlated
-5.04%
More