Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FTMSX vs VSCPX
FTMSX vs VSCPX Comparison
Open Charts FTMSX vs VSCPX
FullerThaler Behvrl Mcr-Cp Eq Instl
Price$25.08
Change+$0.16 (+0.64%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets20.48M
Vanguard Small Cap Index InstlPlus
Price$336.84
Change+$3.97 (+1.19%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets153.28B
FTMSX vs VSCPX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FTMSX vs. VSCPX commentary
Jul 18, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FTMSX is a Buy and VSCPX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
VSCPX has more cash in the bank: 153B vs. FTMSX (20.5M). VSCPX pays higher dividends than FTMSX: VSCPX (1.42) vs FTMSX (0.13). FTMSX was incepted earlier than VSCPX: FTMSX (7 years) vs VSCPX (15 years). FTMSX (1.69) is less costly to investors than VSCPX (0.03). FTMSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 86.00 vs. VSCPX (13.00). FTMSX has a lower initial minimum investment than VSCPX: FTMSX (100000) vs VSCPX (100000000). VSCPX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 4.39 vs. FTMSX (-9.40). VSCPX return over 5 years is better than : 63.25 vs. FTMSX (51.88).
| FTMSX | VSCPX | FTMSX / VSCPX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.33 | 0.03 | 4,433% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.69 | 0.03 | 5,633% |
| Fund Existence | 7 years | 15 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -7.223 | 0.322 | -2,245% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 100000 | 100000000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 20.5M | 153B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.13 | 1.42 | 9% |
| Returns for 1 year | -9.40 | 4.39 | -214% |
| Returns for 3 years | 3.23 | 36.04 | 9% |
| Returns for 5 years | 51.88 | 63.25 | 82% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 105.52 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement