Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FTRNX vs RGAFX
FTRNX vs RGAFX Comparison
Open Charts FTRNX vs RGAFX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R5
Price$83.27
Change+$0.33 (+0.40%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets322.72B
FTRNX vs RGAFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FTRNX vs. RGAFX commentary
Jul 17, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FTRNX is a Buy and RGAFX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGAFX has more cash in the bank: 323B vs. FTRNX (4.12B). RGAFX (0.57) and FTRNX (0.55) have matching dividends . FTRNX was incepted earlier than RGAFX: FTRNX (67 years) vs RGAFX (23 years). FTRNX (0.59) is less costly to investors than RGAFX (0.34). FTRNX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 64.00 vs. RGAFX (25.00). FTRNX has a lower initial minimum investment than RGAFX: FTRNX (0) vs RGAFX (250). RGAFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.59 vs. FTRNX (0.18). FTRNX return over 5 years is better than : 52.31 vs. RGAFX (47.33).
| FTRNX | RGAFX | FTRNX / RGAFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.59 | 0.34 | 174% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.59 | 0.34 | 174% |
| Fund Existence | 67 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.795 | 11.892 | 49% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 4.12B | 323B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.55 | 0.57 | 97% |
| Returns for 1 year | 0.18 | 9.59 | 2% |
| Returns for 3 years | 64.88 | 60.05 | 108% |
| Returns for 5 years | 52.31 | 47.33 | 111% |
| Returns for 10 years | 111.89 | 83.88 | 133% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement