Ad is loading...
FTRNX vs RGAFX
FTRNX vs RGAFX Comparison
Open Charts FTRNX vs RGAFX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R5
Price$67.19
Change+$1.06 (+1.60%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets260.89B
FTRNX vs RGAFX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FTRNX vs. RGAFX commentary
Apr 12, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FTRNX is a Buy and RGAFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGAFX has more cash in the bank: 261B vs. FTRNX (3.4B). RGAFX (0.66) and FTRNX (0.66) have matching dividends . FTRNX was incepted earlier than RGAFX: FTRNX (67 years) vs RGAFX (23 years). FTRNX (0.59) is less costly to investors than RGAFX (0.34). FTRNX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 64.00 vs. RGAFX (25.00). FTRNX has a lower initial minimum investment than RGAFX: FTRNX (0) vs RGAFX (250). RGAFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -4.95 vs. FTRNX (-16.48). RGAFX (48.89) and FTRNX (46.97) have equivalent 5 years return.
| FTRNX | RGAFX | FTRNX / RGAFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.59 | 0.34 | 174% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.59 | 0.34 | 174% |
| Fund Existence | 67 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -19.767 | -9.715 | 203% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 3.4B | 261B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.66 | 0.66 | 100% |
| Returns for 1 year | -16.48 | -4.95 | 333% |
| Returns for 3 years | 4.78 | 7.58 | 63% |
| Returns for 5 years | 46.97 | 48.89 | 96% |
| Returns for 10 years | 65.59 | 52.40 | 125% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...