Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FTRNX vs RGAFX
FTRNX vs RGAFX Comparison
Open Charts FTRNX vs RGAFX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R5
Price$80.33
Change-$0.03 (-0.04%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets313.92B
FTRNX vs RGAFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FTRNX vs. RGAFX commentary
Jun 26, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FTRNX is a Buy and RGAFX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGAFX has more cash in the bank: 314B vs. FTRNX (3.83B). RGAFX (0.61) and FTRNX (0.59) have matching dividends . FTRNX was incepted earlier than RGAFX: FTRNX (67 years) vs RGAFX (23 years). FTRNX (0.59) is less costly to investors than RGAFX (0.34). FTRNX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 64.00 vs. RGAFX (25.00). FTRNX has a lower initial minimum investment than RGAFX: FTRNX (0) vs RGAFX (250). RGAFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.38 vs. FTRNX (-0.04). FTRNX return over 5 years is better than : 57.91 vs. RGAFX (53.53).
| FTRNX | RGAFX | FTRNX / RGAFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.59 | 0.34 | 174% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.59 | 0.34 | 174% |
| Fund Existence | 67 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.780 | 7.941 | 22% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 3.83B | 314B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.59 | 0.61 | 97% |
| Returns for 1 year | -0.04 | 9.38 | -0% |
| Returns for 3 years | 55.62 | 50.83 | 109% |
| Returns for 5 years | 57.91 | 53.53 | 108% |
| Returns for 10 years | 110.23 | 79.57 | 139% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement