Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FTTNX vs HBLIX
FTTNX vs HBLIX Comparison
Open Charts FTTNX vs HBLIX
Fidelity Advisor Asset Manager 30% M
Price$12.65
Change-$0.03 (-0.24%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.06B
Hartford Balanced Income I
Price$14.97
Change-$0.02 (-0.13%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets11.59B
FTTNX vs HBLIX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FTTNX vs. HBLIX commentary
Nov 20, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FTTNX is a Hold and HBLIX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
HBLIX has more cash in the bank: 11.6B vs. FTTNX (2.06B). HBLIX pays higher dividends than FTTNX: HBLIX (3.51) vs FTTNX (2.35). FTTNX was incepted earlier than HBLIX: FTTNX (18 years) vs HBLIX (16 years). FTTNX (1.04) is less costly to investors than HBLIX (0.65). HBLIX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 61.00 vs. FTTNX (19.00). FTTNX has a lower initial minimum investment than HBLIX: FTTNX (0) vs HBLIX (2000). FTTNX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.25 vs. HBLIX (3.25). FTTNX return over 5 years is better than : 14.73 vs. HBLIX (13.82).
| FTTNX | HBLIX | FTTNX / HBLIX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.04 | 0.65 | 160% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.04 | 0.65 | 160% |
| Fund Existence | 18 years | 16 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.049 | 8.620 | 105% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | 500 | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.06B | 11.6B | 18% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.35 | 3.51 | 67% |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.25 | 3.25 | 254% |
| Returns for 3 years | 22.76 | 17.25 | 132% |
| Returns for 5 years | 14.73 | 13.82 | 107% |
| Returns for 10 years | 39.65 | 46.19 | 86% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement