Ad is loading...
FTTNX vs HBLIX
FTTNX vs HBLIX Comparison
Open Charts FTTNX vs HBLIX
Fidelity Advisor Asset Manager 30% M
Price$11.62
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.95B
Hartford Balanced Income I
Price$14.05
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets11.53B
FTTNX vs HBLIX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FTTNX vs. HBLIX commentary
Apr 18, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FTTNX is a Buy and HBLIX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
HBLIX has more cash in the bank: 11.5B vs. FTTNX (1.95B). HBLIX pays higher dividends than FTTNX: HBLIX (3.60) vs FTTNX (2.49). FTTNX was incepted earlier than HBLIX: FTTNX (18 years) vs HBLIX (15 years). FTTNX (1.04) is less costly to investors than HBLIX (0.65). HBLIX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 61.00 vs. FTTNX (22.00). FTTNX has a lower initial minimum investment than HBLIX: FTTNX (0) vs HBLIX (2000). FTTNX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 5.04 vs. HBLIX (4.66). FTTNX (16.62) and HBLIX (16.48) have equivalent 5 years return.
| FTTNX | HBLIX | FTTNX / HBLIX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.04 | 0.65 | 160% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.04 | 0.65 | 160% |
| Fund Existence | 18 years | 15 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -0.956 | 0.158 | -606% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | 500 | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.95B | 11.5B | 17% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.49 | 3.60 | 69% |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.04 | 4.66 | 108% |
| Returns for 3 years | 4.23 | 3.93 | 108% |
| Returns for 5 years | 16.62 | 16.48 | 101% |
| Returns for 10 years | 23.45 | 32.35 | 73% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...