Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FTVSX vs JVMCX
FTVSX vs JVMCX Comparison
Open Charts FTVSX vs JVMCX
FullerThaler Behav Md-Cp Val Instl
Price$31.16
Change+$0.01 (+0.03%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets352.05M
JHancock Disciplined Value Mid Cap C
Price$27.04
Change+$0.05 (+0.19%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets23.44B
FTVSX vs JVMCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FTVSX vs. JVMCX commentary
Nov 20, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FTVSX is a Hold and JVMCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
JVMCX has more cash in the bank: 23.4B vs. FTVSX (352M). FTVSX pays higher dividends than JVMCX: FTVSX (1.50) vs JVMCX (0.00). FTVSX was incepted earlier than JVMCX: FTVSX (8 years) vs JVMCX (14 years). JVMCX (1.86) is less costly to investors than FTVSX (1.03). JVMCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 49.00 vs. FTVSX (33.00). JVMCX has a lower initial minimum investment than FTVSX: JVMCX (1000) vs FTVSX (100000). JVMCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -8.54 vs. FTVSX (-10.41). FTVSX return over 5 years is better than : 45.16 vs. JVMCX (25.73).
| FTVSX | JVMCX | FTVSX / JVMCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.85 | 1.85 | 46% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.03 | 1.86 | 55% |
| Fund Existence | 8 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -8.274 | 6.680 | -124% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 100000 | 1000 | 10,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 352M | 23.4B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.50 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -10.41 | -8.54 | 122% |
| Returns for 3 years | 10.55 | 9.16 | 115% |
| Returns for 5 years | 45.16 | 25.73 | 176% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 32.45 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement