Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FTVZX vs JVMCX
FTVZX vs JVMCX Comparison
Open Charts FTVZX vs JVMCX
FullerThaler Behav Md-Cp Val R6
Price$33.53
Change+$0.33 (+0.99%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets387.96M
JHancock Disciplined Value Mid Cap C
Price$26.03
Change+$0.25 (+0.97%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets21.45B
FTVZX vs JVMCX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FTVZX vs. JVMCX commentary
Jun 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FTVZX is a Buy and JVMCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
JVMCX has more cash in the bank: 21.5B vs. FTVZX (388M). FTVZX pays higher dividends than JVMCX: FTVZX (1.59) vs JVMCX (0.00). FTVZX was incepted earlier than JVMCX: FTVZX (7 years) vs JVMCX (14 years). JVMCX (1.88) is less costly to investors than FTVZX (0.87). JVMCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 47.00 vs. FTVZX (33.00). JVMCX has a lower initial minimum investment than FTVZX: JVMCX (1000) vs FTVZX (1000000). FTVZX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 5.60 vs. JVMCX (-4.66). FTVZX return over 5 years is better than : 74.29 vs. JVMCX (33.39).
| FTVZX | JVMCX | FTVZX / JVMCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.75 | 1.87 | 40% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.87 | 1.88 | 46% |
| Fund Existence | 7 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -2.295 | 1.897 | -121% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 1000 | 100,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 388M | 21.5B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.59 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.60 | -4.66 | -120% |
| Returns for 3 years | 10.73 | 1.47 | 729% |
| Returns for 5 years | 74.29 | 33.39 | 223% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 25.96 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement