Ad is loading...
FTVZX vs JVMCX
FTVZX vs JVMCX Comparison
Open Charts FTVZX vs JVMCX
FullerThaler Behav Md-Cp Val R6
Price$31.59
Change-$2.04 (-6.07%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets405.89M
JHancock Disciplined Value Mid Cap C
Price$23.82
Change-$1.40 (-5.55%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets21.35B
FTVZX vs JVMCX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FTVZX vs. JVMCX commentary
Apr 04, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FTVZX is a Buy and JVMCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
JVMCX has more cash in the bank: 21.4B vs. FTVZX (406M). FTVZX pays higher dividends than JVMCX: FTVZX (1.57) vs JVMCX (0.00). FTVZX was incepted earlier than JVMCX: FTVZX (7 years) vs JVMCX (14 years). JVMCX (1.88) is less costly to investors than FTVZX (0.87). JVMCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 47.00 vs. FTVZX (33.00). JVMCX has a lower initial minimum investment than FTVZX: JVMCX (1000) vs FTVZX (1000000). FTVZX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 4.07 vs. JVMCX (-9.44). FTVZX return over 5 years is better than : 150.89 vs. JVMCX (81.86).
| FTVZX | JVMCX | FTVZX / JVMCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.75 | 1.87 | 40% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.87 | 1.88 | 46% |
| Fund Existence | 7 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -1.030 | -0.316 | 326% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 1000 | 100,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 406M | 21.4B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.57 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 4.07 | -9.44 | -43% |
| Returns for 3 years | 11.70 | -3.54 | -330% |
| Returns for 5 years | 150.89 | 81.86 | 184% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 22.51 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers