Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FTVZX vs JVMCX
FTVZX vs JVMCX Comparison
Open Charts FTVZX vs JVMCX
FullerThaler Behav Md-Cp Val R6
Price$34.87
Change+$0.25 (+0.72%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets393.15M
JHancock Disciplined Value Mid Cap C
Price$28.13
Change+$0.41 (+1.48%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets24.3B
FTVZX vs JVMCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FTVZX vs. JVMCX commentary
Sep 06, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FTVZX is a Buy and JVMCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
JVMCX has more cash in the bank: 24.3B vs. FTVZX (393M). FTVZX pays higher dividends than JVMCX: FTVZX (1.48) vs JVMCX (0.00). FTVZX was incepted earlier than JVMCX: FTVZX (8 years) vs JVMCX (14 years). JVMCX (1.86) is less costly to investors than FTVZX (0.87). JVMCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 49.00 vs. FTVZX (33.00). JVMCX has a lower initial minimum investment than FTVZX: JVMCX (1000) vs FTVZX (1000000). FTVZX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 4.13 vs. JVMCX (1.15). FTVZX return over 5 years is better than : 85.55 vs. JVMCX (47.92).
| FTVZX | JVMCX | FTVZX / JVMCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.75 | 1.85 | 41% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.87 | 1.86 | 47% |
| Fund Existence | 8 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.619 | 11.186 | 23% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 1000 | 100,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 393M | 24.3B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.48 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 4.13 | 1.15 | 359% |
| Returns for 3 years | 24.25 | 21.16 | 115% |
| Returns for 5 years | 85.55 | 47.92 | 179% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 44.95 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers