Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FTVZX vs VMVAX
FTVZX vs VMVAX Comparison
Open Charts FTVZX vs VMVAX
FullerThaler Behav Md-Cp Val R6
Price$34.87
Change+$0.25 (+0.72%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets393.15M
Vanguard Mid-Cap Value Index Admiral
Price$89.40
Change+$0.64 (+0.72%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets32.03B
FTVZX vs VMVAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FTVZX vs. VMVAX commentary
Sep 06, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FTVZX is a Buy and VMVAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
VMVAX has more cash in the bank: 32B vs. FTVZX (393M). VMVAX pays higher dividends than FTVZX: VMVAX (2.15) vs FTVZX (1.48). FTVZX was incepted earlier than VMVAX: FTVZX (8 years) vs VMVAX (14 years). FTVZX (0.87) is less costly to investors than VMVAX (0.07). FTVZX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 33.00 vs. VMVAX (19.00). VMVAX has a lower initial minimum investment than FTVZX: VMVAX (3000) vs FTVZX (1000000). VMVAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.09 vs. FTVZX (4.13). FTVZX return over 5 years is better than : 85.55 vs. VMVAX (67.53).
| FTVZX | VMVAX | FTVZX / VMVAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.75 | 0.07 | 1,071% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.87 | 0.07 | 1,243% |
| Fund Existence | 8 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.619 | 6.774 | 39% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 3000 | 33,333% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 393M | 32B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.48 | 2.15 | 69% |
| Returns for 1 year | 4.13 | 7.09 | 58% |
| Returns for 3 years | 24.25 | 29.13 | 83% |
| Returns for 5 years | 85.55 | 67.53 | 127% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 101.69 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers