Ad is loading...
FTWO vs NLR
FTWO vs NLR Comparison
Open Charts FTWO vs NLR
Strive Natural Resources and SecurityETF
Price$29.60
Change-$1.50 (-4.82%)
Volume$5.44K
Net Assets25.48M
VanEck Uranium & Nuclear ETF
Price$72.55
Change-$2.10 (-2.81%)
Volume$162.82K
Net Assets994.72M
FTWO vs NLR Comparison Chart
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FTWO vs. NLR commentary
Apr 04, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FTWO is a Hold and NLR is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NLR has more net assets: 995M vs. FTWO (25.5M). FTWO has a higher annual dividend yield than NLR: FTWO (3.193) vs NLR (-10.806). FTWO was incepted earlier than NLR: FTWO (2 years) vs NLR (18 years). FTWO (0.49) has a lower expense ratio than NLR (0.61). NLR has a higher turnover FTWO (27.00) vs FTWO (27.00).
| FTWO | NLR | FTWO / NLR | |
| Gain YTD | 3.193 | -10.806 | -30% |
| Net Assets | 25.5M | 995M | 3% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.49 | 0.61 | 80% |
| Turnover | 27.00 | 41.00 | 66% |
| Yield | 1.16 | 0.84 | 138% |
| Fund Existence | 2 years | 18 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| FTWO | NLR | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 88% | 1 day ago 90% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 82% | 1 day ago 90% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 81% | 1 day ago 77% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 80% | 1 day ago 82% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 70% | 1 day ago 77% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 84% | 1 day ago 77% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 88% | 3 days ago 89% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 8 days ago 77% | 5 days ago 76% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 87% | N/A |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 85% | 1 day ago 79% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
FTWO and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FTWO has been closely correlated with CEG. These tickers have moved in lockstep 75% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FTWO jumps, then CEG could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FTWO | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FTWO | 100% | -4.82% | ||
| CEG - FTWO | 75% Closely correlated | -11.29% | ||
| NXE - FTWO | 65% Loosely correlated | -3.02% | ||
| UEC - FTWO | 64% Loosely correlated | -5.52% | ||
| FCX - FTWO | 62% Loosely correlated | -12.28% | ||
| BWXT - FTWO | 62% Loosely correlated | -6.36% | ||
More | ||||
NLR and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, NLR has been closely correlated with NXE. These tickers have moved in lockstep 83% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if NLR jumps, then NXE could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y