Ad is loading...
FTZFF
Price
$0.19
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Oct 29 closing price
STLRF
Price
$0.65
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Nov 15 closing price
Ad is loading...

FTZFF vs STLRF

Header iconFTZFF vs STLRF Comparison
Open Charts FTZFF vs STLRFBanner chart's image
FITZROY MINERALS
Price$0.19
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$1.5K
CapitalizationN/A
STLLR GOLD
Price$0.65
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$5.11K
CapitalizationN/A
FTZFF vs STLRF Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FTZFF vs. STLRF commentary
Nov 18, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FTZFF is a Hold and STLRF is a Hold.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Nov 18, 2024
Stock price -- (FTZFF: $0.19 vs. STLRF: $0.65)
Brand notoriety: FTZFF and STLRF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Precious Metals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FTZFF: 4% vs. STLRF: 16%
Market capitalization -- FTZFF: $0 vs. STLRF: $0
FTZFF [@Precious Metals] is valued at $0. STLRF’s [@Precious Metals] market capitalization is $0. The market cap for tickers in the [@Precious Metals] industry ranges from $47.49B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Precious Metals] industry is $1.04B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FTZFF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileSTLRF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • FTZFF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • STLRF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, FTZFF is a better buy in the long-term than STLRF.

Price Growth

FTZFF (@Precious Metals) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while STLRF (@Precious Metals) price change was -15.97% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Precious Metals industry was -5.50%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -4.71%, and the average quarterly price growth was -2.33%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Precious Metals (-5.50% weekly)

The Precious Metals industry is engaged in exploring/mining metals that are considered to be rare and/or have a high economic value. Popular precious metals include gold, platinum and silver - all three of which are largely used in jewelry, art and coinage alongwith having some industrial uses as well. Precious metals used in industrial processes include iridium, (used in specialty alloys), and palladium ( used in electronics and chemical applications). Historically, precious metals have traded at much higher prices than common industrial metals. Newmont Goldcorp Corp, Barrick Gold Corp and Freeport-McMoRan are few of the major precious metals producing companies in the U.S.

FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FTZFF YTD gains are higher at: 87.819 vs. STLRF (-43.739).
FTZFFSTLRFFTZFF / STLRF
CapitalizationN/AN/A-
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD87.819-43.739-201%
P/E RatioN/AN/A-
RevenueN/AN/A-
Total CashN/AN/A-
Total DebtN/AN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
STLRF: Fundamental Ratings
STLRF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
50
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
33
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100
SMR RATING
1..100
92
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
90
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
75

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
RSI
ODDS (%)
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Momentum
ODDS (%)
MACD
ODDS (%)
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Advances
ODDS (%)
Declines
ODDS (%)
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Aroon
ODDS (%)
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
NRFYX11.460.03
+0.26%
Natixis AEW Global Focused Real Estate Y
PEIOX44.10-0.24
-0.54%
Principal Equity Income R3
CAPCX8.75-0.05
-0.57%
Federated Hermes Capital Income C
AMANX67.80-0.87
-1.27%
Amana Income Investor
GGESX23.94-0.33
-1.36%
Nationwide Global Sust Eq Instl Svc

FTZFF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that FTZFF and AUCCF have been poorly correlated (+29% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that FTZFF and AUCCF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FTZFF
1D Price
Change %
FTZFF100%
N/A
AUCCF - FTZFF
29%
Poorly correlated
N/A
MMRGF - FTZFF
22%
Poorly correlated
-3.07%
AUMN - FTZFF
20%
Poorly correlated
-9.33%
SROYF - FTZFF
20%
Poorly correlated
+1.35%
STLRF - FTZFF
13%
Poorly correlated
-0.46%
More

STLRF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, STLRF has been loosely correlated with PAAS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 44% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if STLRF jumps, then PAAS could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To STLRF
1D Price
Change %
STLRF100%
-0.46%
PAAS - STLRF
44%
Loosely correlated
-2.15%
AGI - STLRF
43%
Loosely correlated
-1.13%
AU - STLRF
42%
Loosely correlated
-0.75%
HL - STLRF
41%
Loosely correlated
-1.79%
DOLLF - STLRF
41%
Loosely correlated
+1.04%
More