Ad is loading...
FTZFX vs VIMAX
FTZFX vs VIMAX Comparison
Open Charts FTZFX vs VIMAX
FullerThaler Behvrll Uncnstd Eq R6
Price$53.70
Change+$0.47 (+0.88%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets164.1M
Vanguard Mid Cap Index Admiral
Price$339.07
Change+$1.71 (+0.51%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets176.87B
FTZFX vs VIMAX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FTZFX vs. VIMAX commentary
Jan 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FTZFX is a Hold and VIMAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
VIMAX has more cash in the bank: 177B vs. FTZFX (164M). VIMAX pays higher dividends than FTZFX: VIMAX (1.49) vs FTZFX (0.26). FTZFX was incepted earlier than VIMAX: FTZFX (6 years) vs VIMAX (23 years). FTZFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 19.00 vs. VIMAX (13.00). VIMAX has a lower initial minimum investment than FTZFX: VIMAX (3000) vs FTZFX (1000000). FTZFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 32.61 vs. VIMAX (20.83). FTZFX return over 5 years is better than : 94.07 vs. VIMAX (50.72).
| FTZFX | VIMAX | FTZFX / VIMAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.129 | 3.732 | 137% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 3000 | 33,333% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 164M | 177B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.26 | 1.49 | 17% |
| Returns for 1 year | 32.61 | 20.83 | 157% |
| Returns for 3 years | 39.00 | 15.31 | 255% |
| Returns for 5 years | 94.07 | 50.72 | 185% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 130.43 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...