Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FTZFX vs VIMAX
FTZFX vs VIMAX Comparison
Open Charts FTZFX vs VIMAX
FullerThaler Behvrll Uncnstd Eq R6
Price$51.15
Change-$0.13 (-0.25%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets212.86M
Vanguard Mid Cap Index Admiral
Price$335.41
Change+$0.71 (+0.21%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets175.12B
FTZFX vs VIMAX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FTZFX vs. VIMAX commentary
Jun 04, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FTZFX is a Buy and VIMAX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
VIMAX has more cash in the bank: 175B vs. FTZFX (213M). VIMAX pays higher dividends than FTZFX: VIMAX (1.52) vs FTZFX (0.18). FTZFX was incepted earlier than VIMAX: FTZFX (6 years) vs VIMAX (24 years). FTZFX (1.14) is less costly to investors than VIMAX (0.05). FTZFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 19.00 vs. VIMAX (16.00). VIMAX has a lower initial minimum investment than FTZFX: VIMAX (3000) vs FTZFX (1000000). FTZFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 11.54 vs. VIMAX (10.80). FTZFX return over 5 years is better than : 98.75 vs. VIMAX (62.21).
| FTZFX | VIMAX | FTZFX / VIMAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.91 | 0.05 | 1,820% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.14 | 0.05 | 2,280% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 0.392 | 2.460 | 16% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 3000 | 33,333% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 213M | 175B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.18 | 1.52 | 12% |
| Returns for 1 year | 11.54 | 10.80 | 107% |
| Returns for 3 years | 51.47 | 24.86 | 207% |
| Returns for 5 years | 98.75 | 62.21 | 159% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 113.61 | - |