Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FTZFX vs VIMAX
FTZFX vs VIMAX Comparison
Open Charts FTZFX vs VIMAX
FullerThaler Behvrll Uncnstd Eq R6
Price$55.60
Change+$0.72 (+1.31%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets249.79M
Vanguard Mid Cap Index Admiral
Price$358.38
Change-$0.51 (-0.14%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets199.16B
FTZFX vs VIMAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FTZFX vs. VIMAX commentary
Sep 06, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FTZFX is a Buy and VIMAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
VIMAX has more cash in the bank: 199B vs. FTZFX (250M). VIMAX pays higher dividends than FTZFX: VIMAX (1.47) vs FTZFX (0.17). FTZFX was incepted earlier than VIMAX: FTZFX (7 years) vs VIMAX (24 years). FTZFX (1.14) is less costly to investors than VIMAX (0.05). FTZFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 19.00 vs. VIMAX (16.00). VIMAX has a lower initial minimum investment than FTZFX: VIMAX (3000) vs FTZFX (1000000). VIMAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 15.20 vs. FTZFX (13.68). FTZFX return over 5 years is better than : 102.98 vs. VIMAX (65.27).
| FTZFX | VIMAX | FTZFX / VIMAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.91 | 0.05 | 1,820% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.14 | 0.05 | 2,280% |
| Fund Existence | 7 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.849 | 9.865 | 90% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 3000 | 33,333% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 250M | 199B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.17 | 1.47 | 12% |
| Returns for 1 year | 13.68 | 15.20 | 90% |
| Returns for 3 years | 74.70 | 41.27 | 181% |
| Returns for 5 years | 102.98 | 65.27 | 158% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 141.44 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement