Ad is loading...
FTZFX vs VIMAX
FTZFX vs VIMAX Comparison
Open Charts FTZFX vs VIMAX
FullerThaler Behvrll Uncnstd Eq R6
Price$53.02
Change-$0.98 (-1.81%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets187.66M
Vanguard Mid Cap Index Admiral
Price$334.98
Change-$6.47 (-1.89%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets184.83B
FTZFX vs VIMAX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FTZFX vs. VIMAX commentary
Feb 23, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FTZFX is a Hold and VIMAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
VIMAX has more cash in the bank: 185B vs. FTZFX (188M). VIMAX pays higher dividends than FTZFX: VIMAX (1.49) vs FTZFX (0.26). FTZFX was incepted earlier than VIMAX: FTZFX (6 years) vs VIMAX (23 years). FTZFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 19.00 vs. VIMAX (13.00). VIMAX has a lower initial minimum investment than FTZFX: VIMAX (3000) vs FTZFX (1000000). FTZFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 20.56 vs. VIMAX (14.06). FTZFX return over 5 years is better than : 94.27 vs. VIMAX (48.46).
| FTZFX | VIMAX | FTZFX / VIMAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.798 | 2.481 | 153% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 3000 | 33,333% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 188M | 185B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.26 | 1.49 | 17% |
| Returns for 1 year | 20.56 | 14.06 | 146% |
| Returns for 3 years | 48.36 | 19.69 | 246% |
| Returns for 5 years | 94.27 | 48.46 | 195% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 114.28 | - |