Ad is loading...
FTZFX vs VIMSX
FTZFX vs VIMSX Comparison
Open Charts FTZFX vs VIMSX
FullerThaler Behvrll Uncnstd Eq R6
Price$51.23
Change-$1.50 (-2.84%)
VolumeN/A
CapitalizationN/A
Vanguard Mid Cap Index Investor
Price$72.18
Change-$2.49 (-3.33%)
VolumeN/A
CapitalizationN/A
FTZFX vs VIMSX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FTZFX vs. VIMSX commentary
Dec 19, 2024
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FTZFX is a StrongBuy and VIMSX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
VIMSX has more cash in the bank: 190B vs. FTZFX (134M). VIMSX pays higher dividends than FTZFX: VIMSX (1.38) vs FTZFX (0.26). FTZFX was incepted earlier than VIMSX: FTZFX (6 years) vs VIMSX (27 years). FTZFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 19.00 vs. VIMSX (13.00). VIMSX has a lower initial minimum investment than FTZFX: VIMSX (3000) vs FTZFX (1000000). FTZFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 31.86 vs. VIMSX (17.86). FTZFX return over 5 years is better than : 94.63 vs. VIMSX (54.73).
| FTZFX | VIMSX | FTZFX / VIMSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 27 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 29.050 | 17.795 | 163% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 3000 | 33,333% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 134M | 190B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.26 | 1.38 | 18% |
| Returns for 1 year | 31.86 | 17.86 | 178% |
| Returns for 3 years | 34.13 | 11.34 | 301% |
| Returns for 5 years | 94.63 | 54.73 | 173% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 125.26 | - |