Ad is loading...
FTZFX vs VIMSX
FTZFX vs VIMSX Comparison
Open Charts FTZFX vs VIMSX
FullerThaler Behvrll Uncnstd Eq R6
Price$53.70
Change+$0.47 (+0.88%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets164.1M
Vanguard Mid Cap Index Investor
Price$74.75
Change+$0.37 (+0.50%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets176.87B
FTZFX vs VIMSX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FTZFX vs. VIMSX commentary
Jan 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FTZFX is a Hold and VIMSX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
VIMSX has more cash in the bank: 177B vs. FTZFX (164M). VIMSX pays higher dividends than FTZFX: VIMSX (1.38) vs FTZFX (0.26). FTZFX was incepted earlier than VIMSX: FTZFX (6 years) vs VIMSX (27 years). FTZFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 19.00 vs. VIMSX (13.00). VIMSX has a lower initial minimum investment than FTZFX: VIMSX (3000) vs FTZFX (1000000). FTZFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 32.61 vs. VIMSX (20.80). FTZFX return over 5 years is better than : 94.07 vs. VIMSX (50.59).
| FTZFX | VIMSX | FTZFX / VIMSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 27 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.129 | 3.719 | 138% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 3000 | 33,333% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 164M | 177B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.26 | 1.38 | 18% |
| Returns for 1 year | 32.61 | 20.80 | 157% |
| Returns for 3 years | 39.00 | 15.25 | 256% |
| Returns for 5 years | 94.07 | 50.59 | 186% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 130.18 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...