Ad is loading...
FTZFX vs VIMSX
FTZFX vs VIMSX Comparison
Open Charts FTZFX vs VIMSX
FullerThaler Behvrll Uncnstd Eq R6
Price$50.42
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
CapitalizationN/A
Vanguard Mid Cap Index Investor
Price$71.51
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
CapitalizationN/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FTZFX vs VIMSX Comparison Chart
Loading...
FTZFX vs. VIMSX commentary
Sep 20, 2024
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FTZFX is a StrongBuy and VIMSX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
VIMSX has more cash in the bank: 172B vs. FTZFX (83.1M). VIMSX pays higher dividends than FTZFX: VIMSX (1.38) vs FTZFX (0.26). FTZFX was incepted earlier than VIMSX: FTZFX (6 years) vs VIMSX (26 years). FTZFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 19.00 vs. VIMSX (13.00). VIMSX has a lower initial minimum investment than FTZFX: VIMSX (3000) vs FTZFX (1000000). FTZFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 36.07 vs. VIMSX (20.56). FTZFX return over 5 years is better than : 92.89 vs. VIMSX (55.02).
| FTZFX | VIMSX | FTZFX / VIMSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 26 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 21.121 | 11.311 | 187% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 3000 | 33,333% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 83.1M | 172B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.26 | 1.38 | 18% |
| Returns for 1 year | 36.07 | 20.56 | 175% |
| Returns for 3 years | 25.96 | 6.77 | 383% |
| Returns for 5 years | 92.89 | 55.02 | 169% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 121.76 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...