Ad is loading...
Ad is loading...
FTZFX vs VIMSX
FTZFX vs VIMSX Comparison
Open Charts FTZFX vs VIMSX
FullerThaler Behvrll Uncnstd Eq R6
Price$52.17
Change-$0.78 (-1.47%)
VolumeN/A
CapitalizationN/A
Vanguard Mid Cap Index Investor
Price$74.37
Change-$0.41 (-0.55%)
VolumeN/A
CapitalizationN/A
FTZFX vs VIMSX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FTZFX vs. VIMSX commentary
Nov 18, 2024
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FTZFX is a Buy and VIMSX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
VIMSX has more cash in the bank: 175B vs. FTZFX (124M). VIMSX pays higher dividends than FTZFX: VIMSX (1.38) vs FTZFX (0.26). FTZFX was incepted earlier than VIMSX: FTZFX (6 years) vs VIMSX (27 years). FTZFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 19.00 vs. VIMSX (13.00). VIMSX has a lower initial minimum investment than FTZFX: VIMSX (3000) vs FTZFX (1000000). FTZFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 42.58 vs. VIMSX (28.28). FTZFX return over 5 years is better than : 96.13 vs. VIMSX (58.93).
| FTZFX | VIMSX | FTZFX / VIMSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 27 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 27.680 | 17.322 | 160% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 3000 | 33,333% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 124M | 175B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.26 | 1.38 | 18% |
| Returns for 1 year | 42.58 | 28.28 | 151% |
| Returns for 3 years | 26.36 | 5.01 | 527% |
| Returns for 5 years | 96.13 | 58.93 | 163% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 127.69 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...