FUFU
Price
$3.79
Change
+$0.34 (+9.86%)
Updated
Aug 7, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
805.24M
LGHL
Price
$2.21
Change
-$0.20 (-8.30%)
Updated
Aug 7, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
3.14M
Interact to see
Advertisement

FUFU vs LGHL

Header iconFUFU vs LGHL Comparison
Open Charts FUFU vs LGHLBanner chart's image
BitFuFu
Price$3.79
Change+$0.34 (+9.86%)
Volume$1.27K
Capitalization805.24M
Lion Group Holding
Price$2.21
Change-$0.20 (-8.30%)
Volume$370
Capitalization3.14M
FUFU vs LGHL Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
FUFU
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
LGHL
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FUFU vs. LGHL commentary
Aug 08, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FUFU is a Hold and LGHL is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 08, 2025
Stock price -- (FUFU: $3.45 vs. LGHL: $2.41)
Brand notoriety: FUFU and LGHL are both not notable
Both companies represent the Investment Banks/Brokers industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FUFU: 29% vs. LGHL: 18%
Market capitalization -- FUFU: $805.24M vs. LGHL: $3.14M
FUFU [@Investment Banks/Brokers] is valued at $805.24M. LGHL’s [@Investment Banks/Brokers] market capitalization is $3.14M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Investment Banks/Brokers] industry ranges from $928.5B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Investment Banks/Brokers] industry is $12.19B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FUFU’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileLGHL’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • FUFU’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • LGHL’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, FUFU is a better buy in the long-term than LGHL.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FUFU’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while LGHL’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • FUFU’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
  • LGHL’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 6 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, FUFU is a better buy in the short-term than LGHL.

Price Growth

FUFU (@Investment Banks/Brokers) experienced а -4.43% price change this week, while LGHL (@Investment Banks/Brokers) price change was -9.06% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Banks/Brokers industry was -0.09%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.06%, and the average quarterly price growth was +9.45%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Investment Banks/Brokers (-0.09% weekly)

These banks specialize in underwriting (helping companies with debt financing or equity issuances), IPOs, facilitating mergers and other corporate reorganizations and acting as a broker or financial advisor for institutions. They might also trade securities on their own accounts. Investment banks potentially thrive on expanding its network of clients, since that could help them increase profits. Goldman Sachs, Morgan Stanley and CME Group Inc are some of the largest investment banking companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FUFU($805M) has a higher market cap than LGHL($3.14M). FUFU YTD gains are higher at: -30.303 vs. LGHL (-74.632).
FUFULGHLFUFU / LGHL
Capitalization805M3.14M25,670%
EBITDAN/A-28.94M-
Gain YTD-30.303-74.63241%
P/E Ratio193.06N/A-
RevenueN/A-2.48M-
Total CashN/A11.2M-
Total DebtN/A5.39M-
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FUFULGHL
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
88%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
86%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
87%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
88%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
88%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
87%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 10 days ago
86%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
90%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
88%
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
FUFU
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
LGHL
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
CSVAX21.28N/A
N/A
Columbia International Div Inc A
FRSLX26.78N/A
N/A
Nuveen Small/Mid Cap Growth Opp A
ALTFX151.12N/A
N/A
AB Sustainable Global Thematic A
JHFEX13.12N/A
N/A
JHancock Fundamental Equity Inc I
TRLCX23.42N/A
N/A
Nuveen Large Cap Value Retire

FUFU and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FUFU has been loosely correlated with BITF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 46% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if FUFU jumps, then BITF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FUFU
1D Price
Change %
FUFU100%
-3.36%
BITF - FUFU
46%
Loosely correlated
+3.25%
COIN - FUFU
46%
Loosely correlated
+1.88%
IREN - FUFU
45%
Loosely correlated
+11.37%
HUT - FUFU
45%
Loosely correlated
+2.07%
HIVE - FUFU
43%
Loosely correlated
+2.42%
More

LGHL and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that LGHL and TOP have been poorly correlated (+30% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that LGHL and TOP's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To LGHL
1D Price
Change %
LGHL100%
+3.43%
TOP - LGHL
30%
Poorly correlated
+1.75%
MEGL - LGHL
26%
Poorly correlated
-0.75%
TREE - LGHL
21%
Poorly correlated
+2.42%
FUFU - LGHL
20%
Poorly correlated
-3.36%
NDAQ - LGHL
20%
Poorly correlated
+0.23%
More