FUFU
Price
$3.95
Change
+$0.04 (+1.02%)
Updated
Aug 28 closing price
Capitalization
647.6M
LGHL
Price
$1.84
Change
+$0.04 (+2.22%)
Updated
Aug 28 closing price
Capitalization
991.12K
Interact to see
Advertisement

FUFU vs LGHL

Header iconFUFU vs LGHL Comparison
Open Charts FUFU vs LGHLBanner chart's image
BitFuFu
Price$3.95
Change+$0.04 (+1.02%)
Volume$146.65K
Capitalization647.6M
Lion Group Holding
Price$1.84
Change+$0.04 (+2.22%)
Volume$22.67M
Capitalization991.12K
FUFU vs LGHL Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
FUFU
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
LGHL
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FUFU vs. LGHL commentary
Aug 29, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FUFU is a StrongBuy and LGHL is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 29, 2025
Stock price -- (FUFU: $3.95 vs. LGHL: $1.84)
Brand notoriety: FUFU and LGHL are both not notable
Both companies represent the Investment Banks/Brokers industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FUFU: 31% vs. LGHL: 2714%
Market capitalization -- FUFU: $647.6M vs. LGHL: $991.12K
FUFU [@Investment Banks/Brokers] is valued at $647.6M. LGHL’s [@Investment Banks/Brokers] market capitalization is $991.12K. The market cap for tickers in the [@Investment Banks/Brokers] industry ranges from $928.5B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Investment Banks/Brokers] industry is $10.29B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FUFU’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileLGHL’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • FUFU’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • LGHL’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, both FUFU and LGHL are a bad buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FUFU’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while LGHL’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • FUFU’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 2 bearish.
  • LGHL’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, FUFU is a better buy in the short-term than LGHL.

Price Growth

FUFU (@Investment Banks/Brokers) experienced а +14.49% price change this week, while LGHL (@Investment Banks/Brokers) price change was +1.66% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Banks/Brokers industry was +3.94%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.39%, and the average quarterly price growth was +22.66%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Investment Banks/Brokers (+3.94% weekly)

These banks specialize in underwriting (helping companies with debt financing or equity issuances), IPOs, facilitating mergers and other corporate reorganizations and acting as a broker or financial advisor for institutions. They might also trade securities on their own accounts. Investment banks potentially thrive on expanding its network of clients, since that could help them increase profits. Goldman Sachs, Morgan Stanley and CME Group Inc are some of the largest investment banking companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FUFU($648M) has a higher market cap than LGHL($991K). FUFU YTD gains are higher at: -20.202 vs. LGHL (-80.632). FUFU has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 58.1M vs. LGHL (-10.27M). FUFU has more cash in the bank: 40.1M vs. LGHL (29M). LGHL has less debt than FUFU: LGHL (2.8M) vs FUFU (40M). FUFU has higher revenues than LGHL: FUFU (383M) vs LGHL (13.5M).
FUFULGHLFUFU / LGHL
Capitalization648M991K65,388%
EBITDA58.1M-10.27M-566%
Gain YTD-20.202-80.63225%
P/E Ratio14.11N/A-
Revenue383M13.5M2,837%
Total Cash40.1M29M138%
Total Debt40M2.8M1,429%
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FUFULGHL
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
89%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
89%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
90%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
87%
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
85%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
86%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
89%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
88%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
85%
Bearish Trend 8 days ago
90%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
88%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
FUFU
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
LGHL
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
CAPEX2880.01N/A
N/A
Eaton Vance Tx-Mgd Growth 1.0
AREDX26.66N/A
N/A
American Century Real Estate R6
SHPCX12.77N/A
N/A
Saratoga Health & Biotechnology C
AIGIX22.04N/A
N/A
Alger International Opportunities I
PRJZX47.51N/A
N/A
PGIM Jennison Global Opportunities Z

FUFU and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FUFU has been loosely correlated with COIN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 46% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if FUFU jumps, then COIN could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FUFU
1D Price
Change %
FUFU100%
+1.02%
COIN - FUFU
46%
Loosely correlated
-0.16%
HOOD - FUFU
43%
Loosely correlated
+0.75%
IREN - FUFU
43%
Loosely correlated
+3.06%
HUT - FUFU
42%
Loosely correlated
+0.61%
BITF - FUFU
41%
Loosely correlated
-1.49%
More

LGHL and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that LGHL and TOP have been poorly correlated (+30% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that LGHL and TOP's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To LGHL
1D Price
Change %
LGHL100%
+2.22%
TOP - LGHL
30%
Poorly correlated
+0.85%
MEGL - LGHL
26%
Poorly correlated
+0.36%
FUFU - LGHL
20%
Poorly correlated
+1.02%
NDAQ - LGHL
20%
Poorly correlated
+0.42%
BGC - LGHL
20%
Poorly correlated
-0.70%
More