FUJHF
Price
$20.00
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Aug 21 closing price
Capitalization
14.72B
GWLLF
Price
$2.17
Change
-$0.06 (-2.69%)
Updated
Aug 19 closing price
Capitalization
27.86B
Interact to see
Advertisement

FUJHF vs GWLLF

Header iconFUJHF vs GWLLF Comparison
Open Charts FUJHF vs GWLLFBanner chart's image
Subaru
Price$20.00
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$260
Capitalization14.72B
Great Wall Motor
Price$2.17
Change-$0.06 (-2.69%)
Volume$380
Capitalization27.86B
FUJHF vs GWLLF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
FUJHF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
GWLLF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FUJHF vs. GWLLF commentary
Aug 24, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FUJHF is a Hold and GWLLF is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 24, 2025
Stock price -- (FUJHF: $20.00 vs. GWLLF: $2.17)
Brand notoriety: FUJHF and GWLLF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Motor Vehicles industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FUJHF: 37% vs. GWLLF: 8%
Market capitalization -- FUJHF: $14.72B vs. GWLLF: $27.86B
FUJHF [@Motor Vehicles] is valued at $14.72B. GWLLF’s [@Motor Vehicles] market capitalization is $27.86B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Motor Vehicles] industry ranges from $1.1T to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Motor Vehicles] industry is $36.11B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FUJHF’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green whileGWLLF’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s).

  • FUJHF’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
  • GWLLF’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
According to our system of comparison, GWLLF is a better buy in the long-term than FUJHF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FUJHF’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while GWLLF’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • FUJHF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
  • GWLLF’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, GWLLF is a better buy in the short-term than FUJHF.

Price Growth

FUJHF (@Motor Vehicles) experienced а -3.73% price change this week, while GWLLF (@Motor Vehicles) price change was +9.08% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Motor Vehicles industry was +3.59%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.73%, and the average quarterly price growth was +12.91%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Motor Vehicles (+3.59% weekly)

Automobiles continue to be arguably the most popular form of passenger travel in the U.S., and major automobile makers have revenues and market capitalizations running into multi-billions. In recent years, the industry has been experiencing some path-breaking innovations like electric vehicles and self-driving technology. While there are long-standing companies like General Motors, Ford, and Toyota Motors operating in this space, there are also emerging/rapidly growing players like Tesla – which has had a major role in the growing popularity of the electric vehicle market. With technological advancements taking steam in the auto space, we’ve also witnessed collaborations (or talks of potential partnerships) of carmakers with tech behemoths like Google’s subsidiary, Waymo.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GWLLF($27.9B) has a higher market cap than FUJHF($14.7B). GWLLF has higher P/E ratio than FUJHF: GWLLF (10.48) vs FUJHF (6.43). GWLLF YTD gains are higher at: 22.535 vs. FUJHF (17.647). FUJHF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 808B vs. GWLLF (24.3B). FUJHF has more cash in the bank: 1.85T vs. GWLLF (37.8B). GWLLF has less debt than FUJHF: GWLLF (58.4B) vs FUJHF (400B). FUJHF has higher revenues than GWLLF: FUJHF (4.76T) vs GWLLF (192B).
FUJHFGWLLFFUJHF / GWLLF
Capitalization14.7B27.9B53%
EBITDA808B24.3B3,325%
Gain YTD17.64722.53578%
P/E Ratio6.4310.4861%
Revenue4.76T192B2,477%
Total Cash1.85T37.8B4,889%
Total Debt400B58.4B685%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FUJHF vs GWLLF: Fundamental Ratings
FUJHF
GWLLF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
2695
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
15
Undervalued
27
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10077
SMR RATING
1..100
324
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5238
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
2123
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

FUJHF's Valuation (15) in the null industry is in the same range as GWLLF (27). This means that FUJHF’s stock grew similarly to GWLLF’s over the last 12 months.

GWLLF's Profit vs Risk Rating (77) in the null industry is in the same range as FUJHF (100). This means that GWLLF’s stock grew similarly to FUJHF’s over the last 12 months.

FUJHF's SMR Rating (3) in the null industry is in the same range as GWLLF (24). This means that FUJHF’s stock grew similarly to GWLLF’s over the last 12 months.

GWLLF's Price Growth Rating (38) in the null industry is in the same range as FUJHF (52). This means that GWLLF’s stock grew similarly to FUJHF’s over the last 12 months.

FUJHF's P/E Growth Rating (21) in the null industry is in the same range as GWLLF (23). This means that FUJHF’s stock grew similarly to GWLLF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FUJHFGWLLF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
74%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
76%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
66%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
69%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
61%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
74%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
61%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
69%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
58%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
75%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
48%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
76%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 16 days ago
48%
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
74%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 27 days ago
53%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
65%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
69%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
60%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
72%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
FUJHF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
GWLLF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
XSVM57.352.38
+4.33%
Invesco S&P SmallCap Value with Momt ETF
EMSF27.870.46
+1.66%
Matthews Emerging Markets Sus Fut ActETF
PYLD26.610.10
+0.38%
PIMCO Multisector Bond Active ETF
PZC6.10N/A
N/A
PIMCO California Municipal Income Fund III
AGFXF10.00N/A
N/A
Deutsche Bank AG (London Branch)

FUJHF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that FUJHF and HMC have been poorly correlated (+22% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that FUJHF and HMC's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FUJHF
1D Price
Change %
FUJHF100%
N/A
HMC - FUJHF
22%
Poorly correlated
+2.03%
F - FUJHF
22%
Poorly correlated
+3.62%
TM - FUJHF
21%
Poorly correlated
+2.08%
GELYF - FUJHF
12%
Poorly correlated
+0.39%
GWLLY - FUJHF
10%
Poorly correlated
+0.08%
More

GWLLF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that GWLLF and XPNGF have been poorly correlated (+21% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that GWLLF and XPNGF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To GWLLF
1D Price
Change %
GWLLF100%
N/A
XPNGF - GWLLF
21%
Poorly correlated
+1.10%
XPEV - GWLLF
20%
Poorly correlated
+4.40%
LI - GWLLF
20%
Poorly correlated
+2.56%
FUJHF - GWLLF
16%
Poorly correlated
N/A
GNZUF - GWLLF
7%
Poorly correlated
+14.88%
More