FUJSF
Price
$18.70
Change
+$4.58 (+32.44%)
Updated
Mar 27 closing price
Capitalization
617.36M
IFLXF
Price
$1.01
Change
+$0.24 (+31.17%)
Updated
Jun 5 closing price
Capitalization
43.33M
Interact to see
Advertisement

FUJSF vs IFLXF

Header iconFUJSF vs IFLXF Comparison
Open Charts FUJSF vs IFLXFBanner chart's image
Fuji Seal
Price$18.70
Change+$4.58 (+32.44%)
Volume$590
Capitalization617.36M
Imaflex
Price$1.01
Change+$0.24 (+31.17%)
Volume$10.02K
Capitalization43.33M
FUJSF vs IFLXF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
IFLXF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FUJSF vs. IFLXF commentary
Jul 18, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FUJSF is a Hold and IFLXF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 18, 2025
Stock price -- (FUJSF: $18.70 vs. IFLXF: $1.01)
Brand notoriety: FUJSF and IFLXF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Containers/Packaging industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FUJSF: 100% vs. IFLXF: 150%
Market capitalization -- FUJSF: $617.36M vs. IFLXF: $43.33M
FUJSF [@Containers/Packaging] is valued at $617.36M. IFLXF’s [@Containers/Packaging] market capitalization is $43.33M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Containers/Packaging] industry ranges from $66.8B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Containers/Packaging] industry is $4.55B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FUJSF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileIFLXF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • FUJSF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • IFLXF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, FUJSF is a better buy in the long-term than IFLXF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

IFLXF’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • IFLXF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 1 bearish.

Price Growth

FUJSF (@Containers/Packaging) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while IFLXF (@Containers/Packaging) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Containers/Packaging industry was -0.74%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.29%, and the average quarterly price growth was +1.12%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Containers/Packaging (-0.74% weekly)

The containers/packing sector includes companies that manufacture containers (like plastic and aluminum food containers, glass bottles, metal cans, cardboard, storage and waste bags, giftwraps etc.) and provide packing services. Food-and-beverage and household products are major markets for this business. Several companies in this industry cater to international markets in addition to serving domestic customers. Consumer spending habits could potentially affect this industry’s performance. Some products, that use oil-based materials as inputs, are likely to see their costs of production get impacted (to some extent) by energy price movements. The ever-expanding e-commerce market has only supercharged the amount/frequency of goods shipped domestically and across borders, thereby creating ample potential opportunities for containers and packaging businesses. Ball Corporation, International Paper Company, Amcor Plc and Packaging Corporation of America are some of the largest U.S. companies in this industry.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FUJSF($617M) has a higher market cap than IFLXF($43.3M). FUJSF has higher P/E ratio than IFLXF: FUJSF (12.52) vs IFLXF (7.34). FUJSF YTD gains are higher at: 32.436 vs. IFLXF (1.000). FUJSF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 15.6B vs. IFLXF (14.3M). FUJSF has more cash in the bank: 22B vs. IFLXF (6.49M). IFLXF has less debt than FUJSF: IFLXF (6.97M) vs FUJSF (12B). FUJSF has higher revenues than IFLXF: FUJSF (184B) vs IFLXF (104M).
FUJSFIFLXFFUJSF / IFLXF
Capitalization617M43.3M1,425%
EBITDA15.6B14.3M109,091%
Gain YTD32.4361.0003,244%
P/E Ratio12.527.34171%
Revenue184B104M176,923%
Total Cash22B6.49M338,774%
Total Debt12B6.97M172,191%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FUJSF vs IFLXF: Fundamental Ratings
FUJSF
IFLXF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
4649
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
42
Fair valued
72
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10067
SMR RATING
1..100
6470
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4749
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
4997
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
55n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

FUJSF's Valuation (42) in the null industry is in the same range as IFLXF (72). This means that FUJSF’s stock grew similarly to IFLXF’s over the last 12 months.

IFLXF's Profit vs Risk Rating (67) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FUJSF (100). This means that IFLXF’s stock grew somewhat faster than FUJSF’s over the last 12 months.

FUJSF's SMR Rating (64) in the null industry is in the same range as IFLXF (70). This means that FUJSF’s stock grew similarly to IFLXF’s over the last 12 months.

FUJSF's Price Growth Rating (47) in the null industry is in the same range as IFLXF (49). This means that FUJSF’s stock grew similarly to IFLXF’s over the last 12 months.

FUJSF's P/E Growth Rating (49) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for IFLXF (97). This means that FUJSF’s stock grew somewhat faster than IFLXF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FUJSFIFLXF
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
41%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
47%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
9%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
49%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
10%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
47%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
57%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
IFLXF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
HOIEF12.44N/A
N/A
Hosiden Corporation
RSTRF70.45N/A
N/A
Restaurant Brands International Limited Partnership
MVLY15.70N/A
N/A
Mission Valley Bancorp
AVIJF0.37N/A
N/A
Avichina Industry & Technology
ALTX0.28-0.01
-3.45%
Altex Industries, Inc.

FUJSF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that FUJSF and HOYFF have been poorly correlated (+11% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that FUJSF and HOYFF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FUJSF
1D Price
Change %
FUJSF100%
N/A
HOYFF - FUJSF
11%
Poorly correlated
N/A
ACGX - FUJSF
3%
Poorly correlated
N/A
AMCCF - FUJSF
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
GRVWF - FUJSF
-0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
IFLXF - FUJSF
-0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

IFLXF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that IFLXF and ACGX have been poorly correlated (+11% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that IFLXF and ACGX's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To IFLXF
1D Price
Change %
IFLXF100%
N/A
ACGX - IFLXF
11%
Poorly correlated
N/A
GRVWF - IFLXF
1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CADNF - IFLXF
1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
AMCCF - IFLXF
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
HOYFF - IFLXF
-0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More