FUL
Price
$59.57
Change
+$0.40 (+0.68%)
Updated
Jul 25 closing price
Capitalization
4.35B
52 days until earnings call
HXPLF
Price
$9.93
Change
+$0.60 (+6.43%)
Updated
Jul 10 closing price
Capitalization
3.74B
Interact to see
Advertisement

FUL vs HXPLF

Header iconFUL vs HXPLF Comparison
Open Charts FUL vs HXPLFBanner chart's image
HB Fuller
Price$59.57
Change+$0.40 (+0.68%)
Volume$276K
Capitalization4.35B
Hexpol AB
Price$9.93
Change+$0.60 (+6.43%)
Volume$1.04K
Capitalization3.74B
FUL vs HXPLF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
FUL
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
HXPLF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FUL vs. HXPLF commentary
Jul 27, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FUL is a Hold and HXPLF is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 27, 2025
Stock price -- (FUL: $59.57 vs. HXPLF: $9.93)
Brand notoriety: FUL and HXPLF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Chemicals: Specialty industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FUL: 66% vs. HXPLF: 186%
Market capitalization -- FUL: $4.35B vs. HXPLF: $3.74B
FUL [@Chemicals: Specialty] is valued at $4.35B. HXPLF’s [@Chemicals: Specialty] market capitalization is $3.74B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Chemicals: Specialty] industry ranges from $223.16B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Chemicals: Specialty] industry is $9.36B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FUL’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileHXPLF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • FUL’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • HXPLF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, HXPLF is a better buy in the long-term than FUL.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FUL’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while HXPLF’s TA Score has 7 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • FUL’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • HXPLF’s TA Score: 7 bullish, 1 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, HXPLF is a better buy in the short-term than FUL.

Price Growth

FUL (@Chemicals: Specialty) experienced а -0.93% price change this week, while HXPLF (@Chemicals: Specialty) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Chemicals: Specialty industry was +2.14%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +6.24%, and the average quarterly price growth was +3.18%.

Reported Earning Dates

FUL is expected to report earnings on Sep 17, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Chemicals: Specialty (+2.14% weekly)

The specialty chemicals sector includes companies that produce chemicals and industrial gases, which are of relatively high-value, often made to customer specifications. Examples of specialty chemicals are electronic chemicals, industrial gases, coatings, adhesives and sealants, industrial and institutional cleaning chemicals. The products are often valued on the basis of their purposes/performances rather than for their composition. Linde Plc, Ecolab Inc., Air Products and Chemicals, Inc., and Dow, Inc. are some of the largest companies making specialty chemicals.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FUL($4.35B) has a higher market cap than HXPLF($3.74B). FUL has higher P/E ratio than HXPLF: FUL (28.70) vs HXPLF (15.27). HXPLF YTD gains are higher at: 2.795 vs. FUL (-11.014). HXPLF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 3.62B vs. FUL (540M). HXPLF has more cash in the bank: 1.27B vs. FUL (165M). FUL has less debt than HXPLF: FUL (1.83B) vs HXPLF (4.14B). HXPLF has higher revenues than FUL: HXPLF (23.1B) vs FUL (3.51B).
FULHXPLFFUL / HXPLF
Capitalization4.35B3.74B116%
EBITDA540M3.62B15%
Gain YTD-11.0142.795-394%
P/E Ratio28.7015.27188%
Revenue3.51B23.1B15%
Total Cash165M1.27B13%
Total Debt1.83B4.14B44%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FUL vs HXPLF: Fundamental Ratings
FUL
HXPLF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
6338
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
55
Fair valued
19
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
6469
SMR RATING
1..100
8257
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5949
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
3957
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
75n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

HXPLF's Valuation (19) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FUL (55) in the Industrial Specialties industry. This means that HXPLF’s stock grew somewhat faster than FUL’s over the last 12 months.

FUL's Profit vs Risk Rating (64) in the Industrial Specialties industry is in the same range as HXPLF (69) in the null industry. This means that FUL’s stock grew similarly to HXPLF’s over the last 12 months.

HXPLF's SMR Rating (57) in the null industry is in the same range as FUL (82) in the Industrial Specialties industry. This means that HXPLF’s stock grew similarly to FUL’s over the last 12 months.

HXPLF's Price Growth Rating (49) in the null industry is in the same range as FUL (59) in the Industrial Specialties industry. This means that HXPLF’s stock grew similarly to FUL’s over the last 12 months.

FUL's P/E Growth Rating (39) in the Industrial Specialties industry is in the same range as HXPLF (57) in the null industry. This means that FUL’s stock grew similarly to HXPLF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FULHXPLF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
71%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
48%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
67%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
58%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
60%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
57%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
57%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
60%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
58%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
52%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
61%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
58%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 17 days ago
55%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
55%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
53%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
65%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
53%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
54%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
FUL
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
HXPLF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
FKAIX52.990.60
+1.15%
Federated Hermes Kaufmann Small Cap IS
BRSVX36.270.14
+0.39%
Bridgeway Small-Cap Value
BCBDX12.670.04
+0.32%
BlackRock Global Dividend Inv C
USBNX27.900.06
+0.22%
Pear Tree Polaris Small Cap Ord
GSIQX21.83-0.07
-0.32%
Goldman Sachs GQG Ptnrs Intl Opps R

FUL and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FUL has been closely correlated with KWR. These tickers have moved in lockstep 67% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FUL jumps, then KWR could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FUL
1D Price
Change %
FUL100%
+0.68%
KWR - FUL
67%
Closely correlated
+0.83%
SCL - FUL
66%
Closely correlated
+0.67%
PPG - FUL
66%
Loosely correlated
+0.81%
RPM - FUL
65%
Loosely correlated
+0.11%
LIN - FUL
65%
Loosely correlated
+0.30%
More

HXPLF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that HXPLF and KWR have been poorly correlated (+25% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that HXPLF and KWR's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To HXPLF
1D Price
Change %
HXPLF100%
N/A
KWR - HXPLF
25%
Poorly correlated
+0.83%
BASFY - HXPLF
24%
Poorly correlated
+0.52%
FUL - HXPLF
21%
Poorly correlated
+0.68%
SKFOF - HXPLF
21%
Poorly correlated
+0.93%
CUYRF - HXPLF
20%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More