FUL
Price
$71.97
Change
-$0.66 (-0.91%)
Updated
Dec 17 closing price
28 days until earnings call
IOSP
Price
$113.62
Change
-$2.35 (-2.03%)
Updated
Dec 17 closing price
62 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

FUL vs IOSP

Header iconFUL vs IOSP Comparison
Open Charts FUL vs IOSPBanner chart's image
HB Fuller
Price$71.97
Change-$0.66 (-0.91%)
Volume$344.8K
CapitalizationN/A
Innospec
Price$113.62
Change-$2.35 (-2.03%)
Volume$114.58K
CapitalizationN/A
FUL vs IOSP Comparison Chart
Loading...
FUL
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
IOSP
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FUL vs. IOSP commentary
Dec 18, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FUL is a StrongBuy and IOSP is a Hold.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Dec 18, 2024
Stock price -- (FUL: $71.97 vs. IOSP: $113.62)
Brand notoriety: FUL and IOSP are both not notable
Both companies represent the Chemicals: Specialty industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FUL: 133% vs. IOSP: 112%
Market capitalization -- FUL: $4.35B vs. IOSP: $3.21B
FUL [@Chemicals: Specialty] is valued at $4.35B. IOSP’s [@Chemicals: Specialty] market capitalization is $3.21B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Chemicals: Specialty] industry ranges from $223.16B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Chemicals: Specialty] industry is $8.96B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FUL’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileIOSP’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • FUL’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • IOSP’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, both FUL and IOSP are a bad buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FUL’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while IOSP’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • FUL’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • IOSP’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 6 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, FUL is a better buy in the short-term than IOSP.

Price Growth

FUL (@Chemicals: Specialty) experienced а -3.99% price change this week, while IOSP (@Chemicals: Specialty) price change was -2.31% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Chemicals: Specialty industry was -1.89%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -2.24%, and the average quarterly price growth was -4.36%.

Reported Earning Dates

FUL is expected to report earnings on Mar 26, 2025.

IOSP is expected to report earnings on Feb 18, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Chemicals: Specialty (-1.89% weekly)

The specialty chemicals sector includes companies that produce chemicals and industrial gases, which are of relatively high-value, often made to customer specifications. Examples of specialty chemicals are electronic chemicals, industrial gases, coatings, adhesives and sealants, industrial and institutional cleaning chemicals. The products are often valued on the basis of their purposes/performances rather than for their composition. Linde Plc, Ecolab Inc., Air Products and Chemicals, Inc., and Dow, Inc. are some of the largest companies making specialty chemicals.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FUL($4.35B) has a higher market cap than IOSP($3.21B). FUL has higher P/E ratio than IOSP: FUL (28.70) vs IOSP (22.73). IOSP YTD gains are higher at: -6.646 vs. FUL (-10.617). FUL has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 540M vs. IOSP (201M). IOSP has more cash in the bank: 204M vs. FUL (165M). IOSP has less debt than FUL: IOSP (45.2M) vs FUL (1.83B). FUL has higher revenues than IOSP: FUL (3.51B) vs IOSP (1.95B).
FULIOSPFUL / IOSP
Capitalization4.35B3.21B136%
EBITDA540M201M269%
Gain YTD-10.617-6.646160%
P/E Ratio28.7022.73126%
Revenue3.51B1.95B180%
Total Cash165M204M81%
Total Debt1.83B45.2M4,051%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FUL vs IOSP: Fundamental Ratings
FUL
IOSP
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
6473
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
71
Overvalued
66
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
3251
SMR RATING
1..100
6761
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
7557
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
8477
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

IOSP's Valuation (66) in the Chemicals Specialty industry is in the same range as FUL (71) in the Industrial Specialties industry. This means that IOSP’s stock grew similarly to FUL’s over the last 12 months.

FUL's Profit vs Risk Rating (32) in the Industrial Specialties industry is in the same range as IOSP (51) in the Chemicals Specialty industry. This means that FUL’s stock grew similarly to IOSP’s over the last 12 months.

IOSP's SMR Rating (61) in the Chemicals Specialty industry is in the same range as FUL (67) in the Industrial Specialties industry. This means that IOSP’s stock grew similarly to FUL’s over the last 12 months.

IOSP's Price Growth Rating (57) in the Chemicals Specialty industry is in the same range as FUL (75) in the Industrial Specialties industry. This means that IOSP’s stock grew similarly to FUL’s over the last 12 months.

IOSP's P/E Growth Rating (77) in the Chemicals Specialty industry is in the same range as FUL (84) in the Industrial Specialties industry. This means that IOSP’s stock grew similarly to FUL’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FULIOSP
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
63%
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
55%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
67%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
66%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
60%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
57%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
55%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
60%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
57%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
59%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
58%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
55%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 17 days ago
59%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
67%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
55%
Bearish Trend 13 days ago
59%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
58%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
72%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
49%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
FUL
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
IOSP
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
QLTA47.52N/A
N/A
iShares Aaa - A Rated Corporate Bond ETF
QDEC27.63N/A
N/A
FT Vest Nasdaq-100 Buffer ETF – Dec
QIS24.78-0.02
-0.08%
Simplify Multi-QIS Alternative ETF
SZNE38.02-0.28
-0.73%
Pacer CFRA-Stovall Eq WghtSeasnlRottnETF
SHPP27.16-0.41
-1.47%
Pacer Industrials and Logistics ETF