FUL
Price
$55.46
Change
+$0.69 (+1.26%)
Updated
Mar 31, 01:37 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
4.35B
86 days until earnings call
IOSP
Price
$94.64
Change
-$0.56 (-0.59%)
Updated
Mar 31, 02:22 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
3.21B
30 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

FUL vs IOSP

Header iconFUL vs IOSP Comparison
Open Charts FUL vs IOSPBanner chart's image
HB Fuller
Price$55.46
Change+$0.69 (+1.26%)
Volume$276
Capitalization4.35B
Innospec
Price$94.64
Change-$0.56 (-0.59%)
Volume$169
Capitalization3.21B
FUL vs IOSP Comparison Chart
Loading...
FUL
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
IOSP
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FUL vs. IOSP commentary
Mar 31, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FUL is a StrongBuy and IOSP is a Hold.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Mar 31, 2025
Stock price -- (FUL: $54.77 vs. IOSP: $95.20)
Brand notoriety: FUL and IOSP are both not notable
Both companies represent the Chemicals: Specialty industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FUL: 154% vs. IOSP: 52%
Market capitalization -- FUL: $4.35B vs. IOSP: $3.21B
FUL [@Chemicals: Specialty] is valued at $4.35B. IOSP’s [@Chemicals: Specialty] market capitalization is $3.21B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Chemicals: Specialty] industry ranges from $223.16B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Chemicals: Specialty] industry is $9.12B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FUL’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileIOSP’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • FUL’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • IOSP’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, IOSP is a better buy in the long-term than FUL.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FUL’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while IOSP’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • FUL’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • IOSP’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, IOSP is a better buy in the short-term than FUL.

Price Growth

FUL (@Chemicals: Specialty) experienced а +2.24% price change this week, while IOSP (@Chemicals: Specialty) price change was -0.84% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Chemicals: Specialty industry was -1.71%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -2.39%, and the average quarterly price growth was -10.66%.

Reported Earning Dates

FUL is expected to report earnings on Jun 25, 2025.

IOSP is expected to report earnings on Apr 30, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Chemicals: Specialty (-1.71% weekly)

The specialty chemicals sector includes companies that produce chemicals and industrial gases, which are of relatively high-value, often made to customer specifications. Examples of specialty chemicals are electronic chemicals, industrial gases, coatings, adhesives and sealants, industrial and institutional cleaning chemicals. The products are often valued on the basis of their purposes/performances rather than for their composition. Linde Plc, Ecolab Inc., Air Products and Chemicals, Inc., and Dow, Inc. are some of the largest companies making specialty chemicals.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FUL($4.35B) has a higher market cap than IOSP($3.21B). FUL has higher P/E ratio than IOSP: FUL (28.70) vs IOSP (22.73). IOSP YTD gains are higher at: -13.502 vs. FUL (-18.538). FUL has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 540M vs. IOSP (201M). IOSP has more cash in the bank: 204M vs. FUL (165M). IOSP has less debt than FUL: IOSP (45.2M) vs FUL (1.83B). FUL has higher revenues than IOSP: FUL (3.51B) vs IOSP (1.95B).
FULIOSPFUL / IOSP
Capitalization4.35B3.21B136%
EBITDA540M201M269%
Gain YTD-18.538-13.502137%
P/E Ratio28.7022.73126%
Revenue3.51B1.95B180%
Total Cash165M204M81%
Total Debt1.83B45.2M4,051%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FUL vs IOSP: Fundamental Ratings
FUL
IOSP
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
54
Fair valued
55
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
5667
SMR RATING
1..100
7987
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
8178
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
574
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

FUL's Valuation (54) in the Industrial Specialties industry is in the same range as IOSP (55) in the Chemicals Specialty industry. This means that FUL’s stock grew similarly to IOSP’s over the last 12 months.

FUL's Profit vs Risk Rating (56) in the Industrial Specialties industry is in the same range as IOSP (67) in the Chemicals Specialty industry. This means that FUL’s stock grew similarly to IOSP’s over the last 12 months.

FUL's SMR Rating (79) in the Industrial Specialties industry is in the same range as IOSP (87) in the Chemicals Specialty industry. This means that FUL’s stock grew similarly to IOSP’s over the last 12 months.

IOSP's Price Growth Rating (78) in the Chemicals Specialty industry is in the same range as FUL (81) in the Industrial Specialties industry. This means that IOSP’s stock grew similarly to FUL’s over the last 12 months.

IOSP's P/E Growth Rating (4) in the Chemicals Specialty industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FUL (57) in the Industrial Specialties industry. This means that IOSP’s stock grew somewhat faster than FUL’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FULIOSP
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
55%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
77%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
59%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
76%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
62%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
60%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
53%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
65%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
61%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
60%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
59%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
53%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
59%
Bullish Trend 15 days ago
67%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 19 days ago
55%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
60%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
66%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
65%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
58%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
48%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
FUL
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
IOSP
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
ARTQX15.32-0.19
-1.23%
Artisan Mid Cap Value Investor
MADCX23.68-0.46
-1.91%
BlackRock Emerging Mkts Instl
RICAX54.98-1.10
-1.96%
American Funds Invmt Co of Amer R1
TCBAX8.70-0.21
-2.41%
Covered Bridge A
BRWTX22.49-0.58
-2.51%
MFS Blended Research Growth Eq R3

FUL and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FUL has been closely correlated with SCL. These tickers have moved in lockstep 69% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FUL jumps, then SCL could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FUL
1D Price
Change %
FUL100%
-4.93%
SCL - FUL
69%
Closely correlated
-3.29%
RPM - FUL
64%
Loosely correlated
-1.92%
AVNT - FUL
64%
Loosely correlated
-3.70%
KWR - FUL
63%
Loosely correlated
-3.31%
WLK - FUL
63%
Loosely correlated
-3.69%
More

IOSP and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, IOSP has been closely correlated with SCL. These tickers have moved in lockstep 72% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if IOSP jumps, then SCL could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To IOSP
1D Price
Change %
IOSP100%
-2.25%
SCL - IOSP
72%
Closely correlated
-3.29%
MTX - IOSP
67%
Closely correlated
-1.97%
AVNT - IOSP
67%
Closely correlated
-3.70%
BCPC - IOSP
65%
Loosely correlated
-1.40%
SXT - IOSP
63%
Loosely correlated
+0.34%
More