FUL
Price
$81.10
Change
+$0.32 (+0.40%)
Updated
Sep 16, 03:15 PM (EDT)
9 days until earnings call
KWR
Price
$164.69
Change
+$3.59 (+2.23%)
Updated
Sep 13 closing price
45 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

FUL vs KWR

Header iconFUL vs KWR Comparison
Open Charts FUL vs KWRBanner chart's image
HB Fuller
Price$81.10
Change+$0.32 (+0.40%)
Volume$200
CapitalizationN/A
Quaker Houghton
Price$164.69
Change+$3.59 (+2.23%)
Volume$53.94K
CapitalizationN/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
FUL vs KWR Comparison Chart
Loading...
FUL
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
KWR
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
VS
FUL vs. KWR commentary
Sep 16, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FUL is a StrongSell and KWR is a StrongBuy.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 16, 2024
Stock price -- (FUL: $80.78 vs. KWR: $164.69)
Brand notoriety: FUL and KWR are both not notable
Both companies represent the Chemicals: Specialty industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FUL: 103% vs. KWR: 57%
Market capitalization -- FUL: $4.35B vs. KWR: $3.65B
FUL [@Chemicals: Specialty] is valued at $4.35B. KWR’s [@Chemicals: Specialty] market capitalization is $3.65B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Chemicals: Specialty] industry ranges from $223.16B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Chemicals: Specialty] industry is $8.9B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FUL’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileKWR’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • FUL’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • KWR’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, FUL is a better buy in the long-term than KWR.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FUL’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while KWR’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • FUL’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 7 bearish.
  • KWR’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, KWR is a better buy in the short-term than FUL.

Price Growth

FUL (@Chemicals: Specialty) experienced а +1.70% price change this week, while KWR (@Chemicals: Specialty) price change was +2.29% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Chemicals: Specialty industry was +2.52%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +3.12%, and the average quarterly price growth was +1.40%.

Reported Earning Dates

FUL is expected to report earnings on Jan 15, 2025.

KWR is expected to report earnings on Oct 31, 2024.

Industries' Descriptions

@Chemicals: Specialty (+2.52% weekly)

The specialty chemicals sector includes companies that produce chemicals and industrial gases, which are of relatively high-value, often made to customer specifications. Examples of specialty chemicals are electronic chemicals, industrial gases, coatings, adhesives and sealants, industrial and institutional cleaning chemicals. The products are often valued on the basis of their purposes/performances rather than for their composition. Linde Plc, Ecolab Inc., Air Products and Chemicals, Inc., and Dow, Inc. are some of the largest companies making specialty chemicals.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FUL($4.35B) has a higher market cap than KWR($3.65B). KWR has higher P/E ratio than FUL: KWR (32.39) vs FUL (28.70). FUL YTD gains are higher at: 0.048 vs. KWR (-22.288). FUL has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 540M vs. KWR (286M). KWR has more cash in the bank: 195M vs. FUL (165M). KWR has less debt than FUL: KWR (789M) vs FUL (1.83B). FUL has higher revenues than KWR: FUL (3.51B) vs KWR (1.95B).
FULKWRFUL / KWR
Capitalization4.35B3.65B119%
EBITDA540M286M189%
Gain YTD0.048-22.288-0%
P/E Ratio28.7032.3989%
Revenue3.51B1.95B180%
Total Cash165M195M85%
Total Debt1.83B789M232%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FUL vs KWR: Fundamental Ratings
FUL
KWR
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
6412
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
76
Overvalued
42
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
1786
SMR RATING
1..100
7274
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5059
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
43100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

KWR's Valuation (42) in the Chemicals Specialty industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FUL (76) in the Industrial Specialties industry. This means that KWR’s stock grew somewhat faster than FUL’s over the last 12 months.

FUL's Profit vs Risk Rating (17) in the Industrial Specialties industry is significantly better than the same rating for KWR (86) in the Chemicals Specialty industry. This means that FUL’s stock grew significantly faster than KWR’s over the last 12 months.

FUL's SMR Rating (72) in the Industrial Specialties industry is in the same range as KWR (74) in the Chemicals Specialty industry. This means that FUL’s stock grew similarly to KWR’s over the last 12 months.

FUL's Price Growth Rating (50) in the Industrial Specialties industry is in the same range as KWR (59) in the Chemicals Specialty industry. This means that FUL’s stock grew similarly to KWR’s over the last 12 months.

FUL's P/E Growth Rating (43) in the Industrial Specialties industry is somewhat better than the same rating for KWR (100) in the Chemicals Specialty industry. This means that FUL’s stock grew somewhat faster than KWR’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FULKWR
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
65%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
59%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
68%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
65%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
59%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
65%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
54%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
66%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
63%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
60%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
64%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
61%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
61%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
60%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
52%
Bearish Trend 8 days ago
71%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
55%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
72%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
52%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
63%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
FUL
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
KWR
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
SPSCX21.220.50
+2.41%
Sterling Capital Behav Sm Cp Val Eq Intl
FFAFX75.120.62
+0.83%
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer 529F3
GSGRX49.200.36
+0.74%
Goldman Sachs Equity Income A
VRTTX480.913.42
+0.72%
Vanguard Russell 3000 Index I
JACAX55.120.35
+0.64%
Janus Henderson VIT Forty Instl

FUL and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FUL has been closely correlated with CE. These tickers have moved in lockstep 71% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FUL jumps, then CE could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FUL
1D Price
Change %
FUL100%
+1.75%
CE - FUL
71%
Closely correlated
+2.72%
PPG - FUL
70%
Closely correlated
+1.19%
RPM - FUL
69%
Closely correlated
+1.90%
KWR - FUL
67%
Closely correlated
+2.23%
AVNT - FUL
66%
Loosely correlated
+3.08%
More

KWR and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, KWR has been closely correlated with FUL. These tickers have moved in lockstep 67% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if KWR jumps, then FUL could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To KWR
1D Price
Change %
KWR100%
+2.23%
FUL - KWR
67%
Closely correlated
+1.75%
CE - KWR
66%
Closely correlated
+2.72%
AVNT - KWR
66%
Loosely correlated
+3.08%
SCL - KWR
65%
Loosely correlated
+1.91%
IOSP - KWR
61%
Loosely correlated
+2.26%
More