Ad is loading...
FUL
Price
$75.96
Change
+$0.29 (+0.38%)
Updated
Nov 15 closing price
59 days until earnings call
PRM
Price
$12.16
Change
+$0.04 (+0.33%)
Updated
Nov 15 closing price
123 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

FUL vs PRM

Header iconFUL vs PRM Comparison
Open Charts FUL vs PRMBanner chart's image
HB Fuller
Price$75.96
Change+$0.29 (+0.38%)
Volume$335.89K
CapitalizationN/A
Perimeter Solutions SA
Price$12.16
Change+$0.04 (+0.33%)
Volume$1.59M
CapitalizationN/A
FUL vs PRM Comparison Chart
Loading...
FUL
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
PRM
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FUL vs. PRM commentary
Nov 18, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FUL is a StrongSell and PRM is a StrongSell.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Nov 18, 2024
Stock price -- (FUL: $75.96 vs. PRM: $12.16)
Brand notoriety: FUL and PRM are both not notable
Both companies represent the Chemicals: Specialty industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FUL: 108% vs. PRM: 210%
Market capitalization -- FUL: $4.35B vs. PRM: $1.08B
FUL [@Chemicals: Specialty] is valued at $4.35B. PRM’s [@Chemicals: Specialty] market capitalization is $1.08B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Chemicals: Specialty] industry ranges from $223.16B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Chemicals: Specialty] industry is $8.9B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FUL’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whilePRM’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • FUL’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • PRM’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, PRM is a better buy in the long-term than FUL.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FUL’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while PRM’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • FUL’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • PRM’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, PRM is a better buy in the short-term than FUL.

Price Growth

FUL (@Chemicals: Specialty) experienced а -2.35% price change this week, while PRM (@Chemicals: Specialty) price change was -12.96% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Chemicals: Specialty industry was -2.99%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -6.50%, and the average quarterly price growth was -7.20%.

Reported Earning Dates

FUL is expected to report earnings on Jan 15, 2025.

PRM is expected to report earnings on Mar 20, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Chemicals: Specialty (-2.99% weekly)

The specialty chemicals sector includes companies that produce chemicals and industrial gases, which are of relatively high-value, often made to customer specifications. Examples of specialty chemicals are electronic chemicals, industrial gases, coatings, adhesives and sealants, industrial and institutional cleaning chemicals. The products are often valued on the basis of their purposes/performances rather than for their composition. Linde Plc, Ecolab Inc., Air Products and Chemicals, Inc., and Dow, Inc. are some of the largest companies making specialty chemicals.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FUL($4.35B) has a higher market cap than PRM($1.08B). FUL has higher P/E ratio than PRM: FUL (28.70) vs PRM (18.56). PRM YTD gains are higher at: 164.348 vs. FUL (-5.661). FUL has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 540M vs. PRM (168M). FUL has more cash in the bank: 165M vs. PRM (52.8M). PRM has less debt than FUL: PRM (690M) vs FUL (1.83B). FUL has higher revenues than PRM: FUL (3.51B) vs PRM (322M).
FULPRMFUL / PRM
Capitalization4.35B1.08B402%
EBITDA540M168M321%
Gain YTD-5.661164.348-3%
P/E Ratio28.7018.56155%
Revenue3.51B322M1,091%
Total Cash165M52.8M313%
Total Debt1.83B690M265%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FUL: Fundamental Ratings
FUL
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
55
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
69
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
26
SMR RATING
1..100
66
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
60
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
81
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FULPRM
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
58%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
76%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
59%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
70%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
69%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
79%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
63%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
68%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
58%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
80%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
59%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
79%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
60%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
81%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
55%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
76%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
68%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
76%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
58%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
82%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
FUL
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
PRM
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
XSVN46.740.08
+0.17%
BondBloxx Bloomberg SevenYrTrgDurUSTrETF
EEMS59.08N/A
+0.01%
iShares MSCI Emerging Markets Sm-Cp ETF
HYGV41.10-0.01
-0.02%
FlexShares HY Val-Scrd Bd
EMP21.90-0.10
-0.45%
Entergy Mississippi LLC
AFSM31.40-0.43
-1.35%
First Trust Active Factor Small Cap ETF

FUL and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FUL has been closely correlated with SCL. These tickers have moved in lockstep 74% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FUL jumps, then SCL could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FUL
1D Price
Change %
FUL100%
+0.38%
SCL - FUL
74%
Closely correlated
-1.53%
IOSP - FUL
73%
Closely correlated
-2.31%
AVNT - FUL
71%
Closely correlated
-1.00%
KWR - FUL
71%
Closely correlated
-0.52%
MTX - FUL
69%
Closely correlated
-1.28%
More

PRM and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, PRM has been loosely correlated with AVNT. These tickers have moved in lockstep 58% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if PRM jumps, then AVNT could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To PRM
1D Price
Change %
PRM100%
+0.33%
AVNT - PRM
58%
Loosely correlated
-1.00%
WLK - PRM
53%
Loosely correlated
-0.02%
TROX - PRM
51%
Loosely correlated
+1.38%
DOW - PRM
48%
Loosely correlated
-1.23%
FUL - PRM
48%
Loosely correlated
+0.38%
More