FUL
Price
$55.60
Change
-$0.60 (-1.07%)
Updated
Aug 1 closing price
Capitalization
4.35B
46 days until earnings call
SNES
Price
$5.25
Change
+$0.01 (+0.19%)
Updated
Aug 1 closing price
Capitalization
3.54M
Interact to see
Advertisement

FUL vs SNES

Header iconFUL vs SNES Comparison
Open Charts FUL vs SNESBanner chart's image
HB Fuller
Price$55.60
Change-$0.60 (-1.07%)
Volume$510.63K
Capitalization4.35B
SenesTech
Price$5.25
Change+$0.01 (+0.19%)
Volume$98.1K
Capitalization3.54M
FUL vs SNES Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
FUL
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SNES
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FUL vs. SNES commentary
Aug 02, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FUL is a Hold and SNES is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 02, 2025
Stock price -- (FUL: $55.60 vs. SNES: $5.25)
Brand notoriety: FUL and SNES are both not notable
Both companies represent the Chemicals: Specialty industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FUL: 119% vs. SNES: 55%
Market capitalization -- FUL: $4.35B vs. SNES: $3.54M
FUL [@Chemicals: Specialty] is valued at $4.35B. SNES’s [@Chemicals: Specialty] market capitalization is $3.54M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Chemicals: Specialty] industry ranges from $223.16B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Chemicals: Specialty] industry is $9.36B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FUL’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileSNES’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • FUL’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • SNES’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, FUL is a better buy in the long-term than SNES.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FUL’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SNES’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • FUL’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • SNES’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, FUL is a better buy in the short-term than SNES.

Price Growth

FUL (@Chemicals: Specialty) experienced а -6.28% price change this week, while SNES (@Chemicals: Specialty) price change was -7.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Chemicals: Specialty industry was -4.37%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -1.77%, and the average quarterly price growth was -0.18%.

Reported Earning Dates

FUL is expected to report earnings on Sep 17, 2025.

SNES is expected to report earnings on May 08, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Chemicals: Specialty (-4.37% weekly)

The specialty chemicals sector includes companies that produce chemicals and industrial gases, which are of relatively high-value, often made to customer specifications. Examples of specialty chemicals are electronic chemicals, industrial gases, coatings, adhesives and sealants, industrial and institutional cleaning chemicals. The products are often valued on the basis of their purposes/performances rather than for their composition. Linde Plc, Ecolab Inc., Air Products and Chemicals, Inc., and Dow, Inc. are some of the largest companies making specialty chemicals.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FUL($4.35B) has a higher market cap than SNES($3.54M). FUL has higher P/E ratio than SNES: FUL (28.70) vs SNES (0.00). SNES YTD gains are higher at: 58.610 vs. FUL (-16.601). FUL has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 540M vs. SNES (-7.57M). FUL has more cash in the bank: 165M vs. SNES (5.4M). SNES has less debt than FUL: SNES (406K) vs FUL (1.83B). FUL has higher revenues than SNES: FUL (3.51B) vs SNES (1.19M).
FULSNESFUL / SNES
Capitalization4.35B3.54M122,844%
EBITDA540M-7.57M-7,132%
Gain YTD-16.60158.610-28%
P/E Ratio28.700.002,692,137%
Revenue3.51B1.19M294,384%
Total Cash165M5.4M3,058%
Total Debt1.83B406K450,985%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FUL vs SNES: Fundamental Ratings
FUL
SNES
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
6070
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
55
Fair valued
84
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
69100
SMR RATING
1..100
8199
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
6336
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
42100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

FUL's Valuation (55) in the Industrial Specialties industry is in the same range as SNES (84) in the Biotechnology industry. This means that FUL’s stock grew similarly to SNES’s over the last 12 months.

FUL's Profit vs Risk Rating (69) in the Industrial Specialties industry is in the same range as SNES (100) in the Biotechnology industry. This means that FUL’s stock grew similarly to SNES’s over the last 12 months.

FUL's SMR Rating (81) in the Industrial Specialties industry is in the same range as SNES (99) in the Biotechnology industry. This means that FUL’s stock grew similarly to SNES’s over the last 12 months.

SNES's Price Growth Rating (36) in the Biotechnology industry is in the same range as FUL (63) in the Industrial Specialties industry. This means that SNES’s stock grew similarly to FUL’s over the last 12 months.

FUL's P/E Growth Rating (42) in the Industrial Specialties industry is somewhat better than the same rating for SNES (100) in the Biotechnology industry. This means that FUL’s stock grew somewhat faster than SNES’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FULSNES
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
74%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
83%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
65%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
60%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
81%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
57%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
58%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
59%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
82%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 24 days ago
55%
Bullish Trend 9 days ago
79%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
55%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
90%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
54%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
86%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
51%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
90%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
FUL
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SNES
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
EICIX18.45N/A
N/A
EIC Value Institutional
VMGMX125.35N/A
N/A
Vanguard Mid-Cap Growth Index Admiral
SMDRX19.57N/A
N/A
Hartford Schroders US MidCap Opps SDR
PIIMX30.98N/A
N/A
Principal Glb Emerging Markets R6
RSGFX11.59N/A
N/A
Victory RS Select Growth C

FUL and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FUL has been closely correlated with KWR. These tickers have moved in lockstep 70% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FUL jumps, then KWR could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FUL
1D Price
Change %
FUL100%
-1.07%
KWR - FUL
70%
Closely correlated
+3.05%
SCL - FUL
69%
Closely correlated
-1.91%
PPG - FUL
68%
Closely correlated
-1.00%
KOP - FUL
67%
Closely correlated
-2.95%
EMN - FUL
66%
Loosely correlated
-19.03%
More