FUL
Price
$58.97
Change
+$0.99 (+1.71%)
Updated
Oct 14 closing price
Capitalization
3.19B
98 days until earnings call
Intraday Buy/Sell Signals
SXT
Price
$95.25
Change
+$1.64 (+1.75%)
Updated
Oct 14 closing price
Capitalization
4.04B
16 days until earnings call
Intraday Buy/Sell Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

FUL vs SXT

Header iconFUL vs SXT Comparison
Open Charts FUL vs SXTBanner chart's image
HB Fuller
Price$58.97
Change+$0.99 (+1.71%)
Volume$243.92K
Capitalization3.19B
Sensient Technology
Price$95.25
Change+$1.64 (+1.75%)
Volume$250.81K
Capitalization4.04B
FUL vs SXT Comparison Chart in %
FUL
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SXT
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FUL vs. SXT commentary
Oct 15, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FUL is a Hold and SXT is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Oct 15, 2025
Stock price -- (FUL: $58.97 vs. SXT: $95.25)
Brand notoriety: FUL and SXT are both not notable
Both companies represent the Chemicals: Specialty industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FUL: 61% vs. SXT: 45%
Market capitalization -- FUL: $3.19B vs. SXT: $4.04B
FUL [@Chemicals: Specialty] is valued at $3.19B. SXT’s [@Chemicals: Specialty] market capitalization is $4.04B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Chemicals: Specialty] industry ranges from $215.35B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Chemicals: Specialty] industry is $8.84B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FUL’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileSXT’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • FUL’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • SXT’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, both FUL and SXT are a bad buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FUL’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SXT’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • FUL’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • SXT’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, SXT is a better buy in the short-term than FUL.

Price Growth

FUL (@Chemicals: Specialty) experienced а +0.68% price change this week, while SXT (@Chemicals: Specialty) price change was +3.15% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Chemicals: Specialty industry was +2.72%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.04%, and the average quarterly price growth was +29.84%.

Reported Earning Dates

FUL is expected to report earnings on Jan 21, 2026.

SXT is expected to report earnings on Oct 31, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Chemicals: Specialty (+2.72% weekly)

The specialty chemicals sector includes companies that produce chemicals and industrial gases, which are of relatively high-value, often made to customer specifications. Examples of specialty chemicals are electronic chemicals, industrial gases, coatings, adhesives and sealants, industrial and institutional cleaning chemicals. The products are often valued on the basis of their purposes/performances rather than for their composition. Linde Plc, Ecolab Inc., Air Products and Chemicals, Inc., and Dow, Inc. are some of the largest companies making specialty chemicals.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SXT($4.05B) has a higher market cap than FUL($3.19B). SXT has higher P/E ratio than FUL: SXT (30.05) vs FUL (28.35). SXT YTD gains are higher at: 35.475 vs. FUL (-11.546). FUL has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 487M vs. SXT (265M). FUL has more cash in the bank: 122M vs. SXT (56.7M). SXT has less debt than FUL: SXT (736M) vs FUL (2.08B). FUL has higher revenues than SXT: FUL (3.5B) vs SXT (1.58B).
FULSXTFUL / SXT
Capitalization3.19B4.05B79%
EBITDA487M265M184%
Gain YTD-11.54635.475-33%
P/E Ratio28.3530.0594%
Revenue3.5B1.58B222%
Total Cash122M56.7M215%
Total Debt2.08B736M283%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FUL vs SXT: Fundamental Ratings
FUL
SXT
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
624
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
52
Fair valued
74
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
7647
SMR RATING
1..100
8262
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
6258
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
2476
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
8590

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

FUL's Valuation (52) in the Industrial Specialties industry is in the same range as SXT (74) in the Chemicals Major Diversified industry. This means that FUL’s stock grew similarly to SXT’s over the last 12 months.

SXT's Profit vs Risk Rating (47) in the Chemicals Major Diversified industry is in the same range as FUL (76) in the Industrial Specialties industry. This means that SXT’s stock grew similarly to FUL’s over the last 12 months.

SXT's SMR Rating (62) in the Chemicals Major Diversified industry is in the same range as FUL (82) in the Industrial Specialties industry. This means that SXT’s stock grew similarly to FUL’s over the last 12 months.

SXT's Price Growth Rating (58) in the Chemicals Major Diversified industry is in the same range as FUL (62) in the Industrial Specialties industry. This means that SXT’s stock grew similarly to FUL’s over the last 12 months.

FUL's P/E Growth Rating (24) in the Industrial Specialties industry is somewhat better than the same rating for SXT (76) in the Chemicals Major Diversified industry. This means that FUL’s stock grew somewhat faster than SXT’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FULSXT
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
54%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
61%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
67%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
59%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
80%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
58%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
62%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
58%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
64%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
57%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
58%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
55%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
63%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
55%
Bearish Trend 8 days ago
57%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
59%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
76%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
51%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
72%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
FUL
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SXT
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
VESIX42.52N/A
N/A
Vanguard European Stock Instl
LBDRX22.03N/A
N/A
BrandywineGLOBAL Div US Large Value R
HNCFX21.09N/A
N/A
Hartford International Growth F
TSCWX20.36N/A
N/A
Nuveen Quant Small Cap Equity W
KLGAX55.32-0.42
-0.75%
NYLI WMC Growth Class A

FUL and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FUL has been closely correlated with KWR. These tickers have moved in lockstep 70% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FUL jumps, then KWR could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FUL
1D Price
Change %
FUL100%
+1.71%
KWR - FUL
70%
Closely correlated
+1.43%
SCL - FUL
70%
Closely correlated
-1.16%
PPG - FUL
68%
Closely correlated
+1.66%
AVNT - FUL
68%
Closely correlated
+0.68%
RPM - FUL
68%
Closely correlated
+2.23%
More