It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
FUL’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileSXT’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
FUL’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SXT’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).
FUL (@Chemicals: Specialty) experienced а -0.93% price change this week, while SXT (@Chemicals: Specialty) price change was +3.84% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Chemicals: Specialty industry was +2.14%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +6.24%, and the average quarterly price growth was +3.18%.
FUL is expected to report earnings on Sep 17, 2025.
SXT is expected to report earnings on Oct 31, 2025.
The specialty chemicals sector includes companies that produce chemicals and industrial gases, which are of relatively high-value, often made to customer specifications. Examples of specialty chemicals are electronic chemicals, industrial gases, coatings, adhesives and sealants, industrial and institutional cleaning chemicals. The products are often valued on the basis of their purposes/performances rather than for their composition. Linde Plc, Ecolab Inc., Air Products and Chemicals, Inc., and Dow, Inc. are some of the largest companies making specialty chemicals.
FUL | SXT | FUL / SXT | |
Capitalization | 4.35B | 2.93B | 148% |
EBITDA | 540M | 213M | 254% |
Gain YTD | -11.014 | 60.542 | -18% |
P/E Ratio | 28.70 | 31.08 | 92% |
Revenue | 3.51B | 1.46B | 241% |
Total Cash | 165M | 28.9M | 571% |
Total Debt | 1.83B | 659M | 278% |
FUL | SXT | ||
---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 63 | 44 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 55 Fair valued | 79 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 64 | 30 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 82 | 62 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 59 | 40 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 39 | 61 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 75 | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
FUL's Valuation (55) in the Industrial Specialties industry is in the same range as SXT (79) in the Chemicals Major Diversified industry. This means that FUL’s stock grew similarly to SXT’s over the last 12 months.
SXT's Profit vs Risk Rating (30) in the Chemicals Major Diversified industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FUL (64) in the Industrial Specialties industry. This means that SXT’s stock grew somewhat faster than FUL’s over the last 12 months.
SXT's SMR Rating (62) in the Chemicals Major Diversified industry is in the same range as FUL (82) in the Industrial Specialties industry. This means that SXT’s stock grew similarly to FUL’s over the last 12 months.
SXT's Price Growth Rating (40) in the Chemicals Major Diversified industry is in the same range as FUL (59) in the Industrial Specialties industry. This means that SXT’s stock grew similarly to FUL’s over the last 12 months.
FUL's P/E Growth Rating (39) in the Industrial Specialties industry is in the same range as SXT (61) in the Chemicals Major Diversified industry. This means that FUL’s stock grew similarly to SXT’s over the last 12 months.
FUL | SXT | |
---|---|---|
RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago71% | 2 days ago50% |
Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago67% | 2 days ago47% |
Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago60% | 2 days ago80% |
MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago57% | 2 days ago44% |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago58% | 2 days ago65% |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago61% | 2 days ago63% |
Advances ODDS (%) | 17 days ago55% | 2 days ago65% |
Declines ODDS (%) | 3 days ago55% | 5 days ago54% |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago53% | 2 days ago61% |
Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago53% | 2 days ago67% |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FUL has been closely correlated with KWR. These tickers have moved in lockstep 67% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FUL jumps, then KWR could also see price increases.
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SXT has been loosely correlated with SCL. These tickers have moved in lockstep 54% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if SXT jumps, then SCL could also see price increases.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To SXT | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
SXT | 100% | +2.99% | ||
SCL - SXT | 54% Loosely correlated | +0.67% | ||
IOSP - SXT | 53% Loosely correlated | +0.24% | ||
SXYAY - SXT | 53% Loosely correlated | +1.55% | ||
AVNT - SXT | 50% Loosely correlated | N/A | ||
FUL - SXT | 48% Loosely correlated | +0.68% | ||
More |