Advertisement
FUL vs WDFC
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FUL is a Hold and WDFC is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
FUL’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileWDFC’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
- FUL’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
- WDFC’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
FUL’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while WDFC’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).
- FUL’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
- WDFC’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 7 bearish.
Price Growth
FUL (@Chemicals: Specialty) experienced а -3.61% price change this week, while WDFC (@Chemicals: Specialty) price change was -3.11% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Chemicals: Specialty industry was -3.49%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -5.62%, and the average quarterly price growth was +15.64%.
Reported Earning Dates
FUL is expected to report earnings on Jan 21, 2026.
WDFC is expected to report earnings on Jan 14, 2026.
Industries' Descriptions
@Chemicals: Specialty (-3.49% weekly)The specialty chemicals sector includes companies that produce chemicals and industrial gases, which are of relatively high-value, often made to customer specifications. Examples of specialty chemicals are electronic chemicals, industrial gases, coatings, adhesives and sealants, industrial and institutional cleaning chemicals. The products are often valued on the basis of their purposes/performances rather than for their composition. Linde Plc, Ecolab Inc., Air Products and Chemicals, Inc., and Dow, Inc. are some of the largest companies making specialty chemicals.
| FUL | WDFC | FUL / WDFC | |
| Capitalization | 3.02B | 2.63B | 115% |
| EBITDA | 487M | 113M | 431% |
| Gain YTD | -15.982 | -18.396 | 87% |
| P/E Ratio | 26.82 | 29.09 | 92% |
| Revenue | 3.5B | 620M | 565% |
| Total Cash | 122M | 58.1M | 210% |
| Total Debt | 2.08B | 97.7M | 2,129% |
FUL | WDFC | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 58 | 23 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 50 Fair valued | 52 Fair valued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 80 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 78 | 25 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 61 | 63 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 26 | 91 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
FUL's Valuation (50) in the Industrial Specialties industry is in the same range as WDFC (52). This means that FUL’s stock grew similarly to WDFC’s over the last 12 months.
FUL's Profit vs Risk Rating (80) in the Industrial Specialties industry is in the same range as WDFC (100). This means that FUL’s stock grew similarly to WDFC’s over the last 12 months.
WDFC's SMR Rating (25) in the Industrial Specialties industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FUL (78). This means that WDFC’s stock grew somewhat faster than FUL’s over the last 12 months.
FUL's Price Growth Rating (61) in the Industrial Specialties industry is in the same range as WDFC (63). This means that FUL’s stock grew similarly to WDFC’s over the last 12 months.
FUL's P/E Growth Rating (26) in the Industrial Specialties industry is somewhat better than the same rating for WDFC (91). This means that FUL’s stock grew somewhat faster than WDFC’s over the last 12 months.
| FUL | WDFC | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | 1 day ago 76% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 67% | 1 day ago 61% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 66% | 1 day ago 65% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 66% | 1 day ago 59% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 57% | 1 day ago 59% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 57% | 1 day ago 55% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 8 days ago 54% | 9 days ago 55% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 55% | 25 days ago 56% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 53% | 1 day ago 61% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 51% | 1 day ago 53% |
Advertisement
FUL and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FUL has been closely correlated with SCL. These tickers have moved in lockstep 69% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FUL jumps, then SCL could also see price increases.
WDFC and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, WDFC has been loosely correlated with BCPC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 45% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if WDFC jumps, then BCPC could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To WDFC | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| WDFC | 100% | -0.42% | ||
| BCPC - WDFC | 45% Loosely correlated | -1.06% | ||
| SHW - WDFC | 42% Loosely correlated | +1.84% | ||
| RPM - WDFC | 40% Loosely correlated | -0.13% | ||
| FUL - WDFC | 35% Loosely correlated | -0.43% | ||
| IFF - WDFC | 34% Loosely correlated | -1.32% | ||
More | ||||