FULT's Logo
Stock
NASDAQ
FULT
Price
$14.67
Change
-$0.17 (-1.15%)
Updated
Jun 28, 6:59 PM EST
WAFD's Logo
Stock
NASDAQ
WAFD
Price
$30.39
Change
-$0.40 (-1.30%)
Updated
Jun 28, 6:59 PM EST
Header icon

FULT vs WAFD Comparison

Open Charts FULT vs WAFDBanner chart's image
AI

View a ticker or compare two or three

FULT vs WAFD. Compare Fundamental and Technical Ratings

VS
FULT vs WAFD Comparison Chart

Loading...

VS
FULT vs. WAFD commentary
Jun 29, 2022
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FULT is a Buy and WAFD is a StrongSell.
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 29, 2022
Stock price -- (FULT: $14.67 vs. WAFD: $30.39)
Brand notoriety: FULT and WAFD are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FULT: 64% vs. WAFD: 83%
Market capitalization -- FULT: $2.36B vs. WAFD: $1.98B
FULT [@Regional Banks] is valued at $2.36B. WAFD’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $1.98B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $157.34B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $4.87B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FULT’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileWAFD’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • FULT’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • WAFD’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, FULT is a better buy in the long-term than WAFD.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FULT’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while WAFD’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • FULT’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • WAFD’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, FULT is a better buy in the short-term than WAFD.

Price Growth

FULT (@Regional Banks) experienced а +0.82% price change this week, while WAFD (@Regional Banks) price change was +0.07% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was -0.03%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was 0.00%, and the average quarterly price growth was 0.00%.

Reported Earning Dates

FULT is expected to report earnings on Jul 19, 2022.

WAFD is expected to report earnings on Jul 19, 2022.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (-0.03% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
A.I.dvisor published
a Summary for FULT with price predictions.
OPEN
A.I.dvisor published
a Summary for WAFD with price predictions.
OPEN
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FULT($2.36B) has a higher market cap than WAFD($1.99B). WAFD has higher P/E ratio than FULT: WAFD (11.14) vs FULT (9.35). WAFD YTD gains are higher at: -7.626 vs. FULT (-12.939). FULT has less debt than WAFD: FULT (1.01B) vs WAFD (1.72B). FULT has higher revenues than WAFD: FULT (928M) vs WAFD (598M).
FULTWAFDFULT / WAFD
Capitalization2.36B1.99B119%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD-12.939-7.626170%
P/E Ratio9.3511.1484%
Revenue928M598M155%
Total CashN/AN/A-
Total Debt1.01B1.72B59%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS

FULT vs WAFD: Fundamental Ratings

FULT
WAFD
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
1757
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
42
Fair valued
76
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10080
SMR RATING
1..100
2329
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
7169
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
3847
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

FULT's Valuation (42) in the Regional Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for WAFD (76) in the Savings Banks industry. This means that FULT’s stock grew somewhat faster than WAFD’s over the last 12 months.

WAFD's Profit vs Risk Rating (80) in the Savings Banks industry is in the same range as FULT (100) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that WAFD’s stock grew similarly to FULT’s over the last 12 months.

FULT's SMR Rating (23) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as WAFD (29) in the Savings Banks industry. This means that FULT’s stock grew similarly to WAFD’s over the last 12 months.

WAFD's Price Growth Rating (69) in the Savings Banks industry is in the same range as FULT (71) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that WAFD’s stock grew similarly to FULT’s over the last 12 months.

FULT's P/E Growth Rating (38) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as WAFD (47) in the Savings Banks industry. This means that FULT’s stock grew similarly to WAFD’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FULTWAFD
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
65%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
48%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
61%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
55%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
63%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
66%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
76%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
63%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
56%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
54%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
62%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
61%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
56%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
55%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 16 days ago
63%
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
56%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
70%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
58%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
63%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
47%
AI

View a ticker or compare two or three

Interesting Tickers

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
MMAPX27.06-0.33
-1.20%
MainStay WMC Value R3
FWMIX50.98-0.64
-1.24%
American Funds Washington Mutual F3
INAAX14.59-0.19
-1.29%
ALPS/Kotak India ESG A
MLNCX14.02-0.24
-1.68%
Morgan Stanley Instl Glbl Concntr C
PMYCX27.73-0.53
-1.88%
Putnam Multi-Cap Core C

FULT and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FULT has been closely correlated with HWC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 87% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FULT jumps, then HWC could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FULT
1D Price
Change %
FULT100%
-1.15%
HWC - FULT
87%
Closely correlated
-0.85%
AUB - FULT
86%
Closely correlated
+0.24%
WAFD - FULT
86%
Closely correlated
-1.30%
FNB - FULT
86%
Closely correlated
-0.45%
WTFC - FULT
86%
Closely correlated
-0.32%
More

WAFD and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, WAFD has been closely correlated with FULT. These tickers have moved in lockstep 86% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if WAFD jumps, then FULT could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To WAFD
1D Price
Change %
WAFD100%
-1.30%
FULT - WAFD
86%
Closely correlated
-1.15%
BOH - WAFD
84%
Closely correlated
-0.70%
FNB - WAFD
84%
Closely correlated
-0.45%
GBCI - WAFD
84%
Closely correlated
-0.99%
FFBC - WAFD
83%
Closely correlated
-0.25%
More