FULT
Price
$23.62
Change
-$0.03 (-0.13%)
Updated
Aug 20 closing price
Capitalization
4.52B
60 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
WAFD
Price
$36.65
Change
-$0.07 (-0.19%)
Updated
Aug 20 closing price
Capitalization
2.71B
56 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

FULT vs WAFD

FULT vs WAFD Comparison Chart in %
loading
loading
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FULT vs. WAFD commentary
Aug 21, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FULT is a Hold and WAFD is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 21, 2026
Stock price -- (FULT: $23.65 vs. WAFD: $36.72)
Brand notoriety: FULT and WAFD are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FULT: 77% vs. WAFD: 77%
Market capitalization -- FULT: $4.52B vs. WAFD: $2.71B
FULT [@Regional Banks] is valued at $4.52B. WAFD’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $2.71B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $142.82B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $6.37B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FULT’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green whileWAFD’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • FULT’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
  • WAFD’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, FULT is a better buy in the long-term than WAFD.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FULT’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while WAFD’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • FULT’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • WAFD’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 6 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, FULT is a better buy in the short-term than WAFD.

Price Growth

FULT (@Regional Banks) experienced а -3.07% price change this week, while WAFD (@Regional Banks) price change was -2.75% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was -2.41%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.27%, and the average quarterly price growth was +8.89%.

Reported Earning Dates

FULT is expected to report earnings on Oct 20, 2026.

WAFD is expected to report earnings on Oct 15, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (-2.41% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FULT($4.52B) has a higher market cap than WAFD($2.71B). WAFD (11.56) and FULT (11.36) have similar P/E ratio . FULT YTD gains are higher at: 24.479 vs. WAFD (16.484). FULT has less debt than WAFD: FULT (1.25B) vs WAFD (3.12B). FULT has higher revenues than WAFD: FULT (1.33B) vs WAFD (763M).
FULTWAFDFULT / WAFD
Capitalization4.52B2.71B167%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD24.47916.484149%
P/E Ratio11.3611.5698%
Revenue1.33B763M174%
Total Cash312MN/A-
Total Debt1.25B3.12B40%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FULT vs WAFD: Fundamental Ratings
FULT
WAFD
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5973
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
27
Undervalued
40
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
3356
SMR RATING
1..100
2436
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4648
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
4350
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
4250

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

FULT's Valuation (27) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as WAFD (40) in the Savings Banks industry. This means that FULT’s stock grew similarly to WAFD’s over the last 12 months.

FULT's Profit vs Risk Rating (33) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as WAFD (56) in the Savings Banks industry. This means that FULT’s stock grew similarly to WAFD’s over the last 12 months.

FULT's SMR Rating (24) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as WAFD (36) in the Savings Banks industry. This means that FULT’s stock grew similarly to WAFD’s over the last 12 months.

FULT's Price Growth Rating (46) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as WAFD (48) in the Savings Banks industry. This means that FULT’s stock grew similarly to WAFD’s over the last 12 months.

FULT's P/E Growth Rating (43) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as WAFD (50) in the Savings Banks industry. This means that FULT’s stock grew similarly to WAFD’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FULTWAFD
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
53%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
64%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
64%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
64%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
65%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
63%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
73%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
63%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
63%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
56%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
61%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
62%
Bullish Trend 10 days ago
60%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
59%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
61%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
62%
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
78%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
60%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
55%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
FULT
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
WAFD
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
RVT18.820.10
+0.53%
Royce Value Trust
RMOP25.050.10
+0.40%
Rockefeller Opportunistic Muncpl Bd ETF
KMAR32.620.09
+0.28%
Innovator U.S. Small Cp Pwr Buf ETF -Mar
PFRL49.740.05
+0.10%
PGIM Floating Rate Income ETF
ZCBE49.25N/A
N/A
Global X Zero Coupon Bond 2033 ETF

WAFD and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, WAFD has been closely correlated with UBSI. These tickers have moved in lockstep 80% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if WAFD jumps, then UBSI could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To WAFD
1D Price
Change %
WAFD100%
-1.98%
UBSI - WAFD
80%
Closely correlated
-2.21%
CVBF - WAFD
78%
Closely correlated
-2.21%
CATY - WAFD
78%
Closely correlated
-2.63%
EFSC - WAFD
78%
Closely correlated
-2.83%
FULT - WAFD
78%
Closely correlated
-2.67%
More