FULT
Price
$18.15
Change
-$0.10 (-0.55%)
Updated
Nov 28 closing price
Capitalization
3.3B
52 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
WASH
Price
$28.40
Change
-$0.19 (-0.66%)
Updated
Nov 28 closing price
Capitalization
540.59M
60 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

FULT vs WASH

Header iconFULT vs WASH Comparison
Open Charts FULT vs WASHBanner chart's image
Fulton Financial
Price$18.15
Change-$0.10 (-0.55%)
Volume$734.07K
Capitalization3.3B
Washington Trust Ban
Price$28.40
Change-$0.19 (-0.66%)
Volume$40.25K
Capitalization540.59M
FULT vs WASH Comparison Chart in %
FULT
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
WASH
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FULT vs. WASH commentary
Nov 29, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FULT is a StrongBuy and WASH is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Nov 29, 2025
Stock price -- (FULT: $18.15 vs. WASH: $28.40)
Brand notoriety: FULT and WASH are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FULT: 46% vs. WASH: 30%
Market capitalization -- FULT: $3.3B vs. WASH: $540.59M
FULT [@Regional Banks] is valued at $3.3B. WASH’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $540.59M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $173.44B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $8.21B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FULT’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileWASH’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • FULT’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • WASH’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, FULT is a better buy in the long-term than WASH.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FULT’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while WASH’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • FULT’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • WASH’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, WASH is a better buy in the short-term than FULT.

Price Growth

FULT (@Regional Banks) experienced а +1.06% price change this week, while WASH (@Regional Banks) price change was +2.49% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +1.67%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +3.81%, and the average quarterly price growth was +13.68%.

Reported Earning Dates

FULT is expected to report earnings on Jan 20, 2026.

WASH is expected to report earnings on Jan 28, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+1.67% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FULT($3.3B) has a higher market cap than WASH($541M). WASH has higher P/E ratio than FULT: WASH (12.16) vs FULT (9.55). WASH YTD gains are higher at: -2.266 vs. FULT (-3.020). FULT has more cash in the bank: 362M vs. WASH (44M). WASH has less debt than FULT: WASH (1.06B) vs FULT (1.77B). FULT has higher revenues than WASH: FULT (1.29B) vs WASH (111M).
FULTWASHFULT / WASH
Capitalization3.3B541M610%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD-3.020-2.266133%
P/E Ratio9.5512.1679%
Revenue1.29B111M1,162%
Total Cash362M44M823%
Total Debt1.77B1.06B167%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FULT vs WASH: Fundamental Ratings
FULT
WASH
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
474
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
25
Undervalued
35
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
4089
SMR RATING
1..100
1265
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5858
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
8017
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

FULT's Valuation (25) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as WASH (35). This means that FULT’s stock grew similarly to WASH’s over the last 12 months.

FULT's Profit vs Risk Rating (40) in the Regional Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for WASH (89). This means that FULT’s stock grew somewhat faster than WASH’s over the last 12 months.

FULT's SMR Rating (12) in the Regional Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for WASH (65). This means that FULT’s stock grew somewhat faster than WASH’s over the last 12 months.

FULT's Price Growth Rating (58) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as WASH (58). This means that FULT’s stock grew similarly to WASH’s over the last 12 months.

WASH's P/E Growth Rating (17) in the Regional Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FULT (80). This means that WASH’s stock grew somewhat faster than FULT’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FULTWASH
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
56%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
65%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
57%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
60%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
69%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
69%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
59%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
56%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
54%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
54%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
59%
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
56%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
60%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
68%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
63%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
58%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
68%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
51%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
FULT
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
WASH
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
FDVIX31.33N/A
N/A
Fidelity Advisor Diversified Intl I
INTIX13.63N/A
N/A
Voya International Index Port S
DTLVX23.95N/A
N/A
Wilshire Large Company Value Invmt
AMIGX95.85N/A
N/A
Amana Growth Institutional
PAHSX7.07N/A
N/A
PGIM Jennison NextGeneration Glb Opps A