FULT
Price
$18.72
Change
+$0.24 (+1.30%)
Updated
Aug 13 closing price
Capitalization
3.41B
68 days until earnings call
WASH
Price
$29.28
Change
+$0.34 (+1.17%)
Updated
Aug 13 closing price
Capitalization
560.86M
74 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

FULT vs WASH

Header iconFULT vs WASH Comparison
Open Charts FULT vs WASHBanner chart's image
Fulton Financial
Price$18.72
Change+$0.24 (+1.30%)
Volume$1.78M
Capitalization3.41B
Washington Trust Ban
Price$29.28
Change+$0.34 (+1.17%)
Volume$126.59K
Capitalization560.86M
FULT vs WASH Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
FULT
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
WASH
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FULT vs. WASH commentary
Aug 14, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FULT is a StrongBuy and WASH is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 14, 2025
Stock price -- (FULT: $18.72 vs. WASH: $29.28)
Brand notoriety: FULT and WASH are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FULT: 109% vs. WASH: 87%
Market capitalization -- FULT: $3.41B vs. WASH: $560.86M
FULT [@Regional Banks] is valued at $3.41B. WASH’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $560.86M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $173.33B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $7.85B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FULT’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileWASH’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • FULT’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • WASH’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, FULT is a better buy in the long-term than WASH.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FULT’s TA Score shows that 7 TA indicator(s) are bullish while WASH’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • FULT’s TA Score: 7 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • WASH’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, FULT is a better buy in the short-term than WASH.

Price Growth

FULT (@Regional Banks) experienced а +6.55% price change this week, while WASH (@Regional Banks) price change was +8.73% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +2.78%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.59%, and the average quarterly price growth was +9.49%.

Reported Earning Dates

FULT is expected to report earnings on Oct 21, 2025.

WASH is expected to report earnings on Oct 27, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+2.78% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FULT($3.41B) has a higher market cap than WASH($561M). WASH has higher P/E ratio than FULT: WASH (12.16) vs FULT (11.01). FULT YTD gains are higher at: -0.940 vs. WASH (-1.190). FULT has more cash in the bank: 389M vs. WASH (33.4M). WASH has less debt than FULT: WASH (911M) vs FULT (1.66B). FULT has higher revenues than WASH: FULT (1.23B) vs WASH (111M).
FULTWASHFULT / WASH
Capitalization3.41B561M608%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD-0.940-1.19079%
P/E Ratio11.0112.1691%
Revenue1.23B111M1,111%
Total Cash389M33.4M1,165%
Total Debt1.66B911M182%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FULT vs WASH: Fundamental Ratings
FULT
WASH
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
558
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
33
Fair valued
35
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
3481
SMR RATING
1..100
1270
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5859
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
4423
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
8550

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

FULT's Valuation (33) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as WASH (35). This means that FULT’s stock grew similarly to WASH’s over the last 12 months.

FULT's Profit vs Risk Rating (34) in the Regional Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for WASH (81). This means that FULT’s stock grew somewhat faster than WASH’s over the last 12 months.

FULT's SMR Rating (12) in the Regional Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for WASH (70). This means that FULT’s stock grew somewhat faster than WASH’s over the last 12 months.

FULT's Price Growth Rating (58) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as WASH (59). This means that FULT’s stock grew similarly to WASH’s over the last 12 months.

WASH's P/E Growth Rating (23) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as FULT (44). This means that WASH’s stock grew similarly to FULT’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FULTWASH
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
67%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
71%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
63%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
63%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
57%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
62%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
65%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
67%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
63%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
59%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
59%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
58%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
62%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
58%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 8 days ago
58%
Bearish Trend 13 days ago
66%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
61%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
68%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
62%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
56%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
FULT
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
WASH
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
JMGRX149.871.50
+1.01%
Janus Henderson Enterprise I
ARTGX26.720.09
+0.34%
Artisan Global Value Investor
SSMAX10.19N/A
N/A
SEI Small/Mid Cap Equity A (SIIT)
OSTGX16.51N/A
N/A
Osterweis Opportunity Fund
SQCBX13.76N/A
N/A
X-Square Balanced Fund, LLC C

FULT and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FULT has been closely correlated with FNB. These tickers have moved in lockstep 93% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FULT jumps, then FNB could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FULT
1D Price
Change %
FULT100%
+1.30%
FNB - FULT
93%
Closely correlated
+2.26%
ASB - FULT
91%
Closely correlated
+2.47%
HWC - FULT
91%
Closely correlated
+1.63%
UCB - FULT
91%
Closely correlated
+2.17%
ONB - FULT
90%
Closely correlated
+1.77%
More

WASH and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, WASH has been closely correlated with UBSI. These tickers have moved in lockstep 88% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if WASH jumps, then UBSI could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To WASH
1D Price
Change %
WASH100%
+1.17%
UBSI - WASH
88%
Closely correlated
+2.08%
STBA - WASH
87%
Closely correlated
+1.56%
PEBO - WASH
86%
Closely correlated
+0.98%
BY - WASH
86%
Closely correlated
+1.81%
FULT - WASH
86%
Closely correlated
+1.30%
More