FULT
Price
$23.66
Change
+$0.61 (+2.65%)
Updated
Jun 23, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
4.52B
28 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
WTFC
Price
$157.42
Change
+$1.65 (+1.06%)
Updated
Jun 23, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
10.62B
29 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

FULT vs WTFC

FULT vs WTFC Comparison Chart in %
loading
loading
View a ticker or compare two or three

Which Stock Would AI Choose? Fulton Financial Corporation (FULT) vs. Wintrust Financial Corporation (WTFC) Stock Comparison

Key Takeaways

  • FULT and WTFC both delivered strong one-year returns exceeding 44%, outperforming broader market indices in recent market activity.
  • WTFC, with a market cap of approximately $10 billion, recently reported record Q1 net income of $227 million and EPS of $3.22, surpassing expectations.
  • FULT, market cap around $4.3 billion, shows higher YTD gains at 15.5% versus WTFC's 6.8%, amid ongoing merger integration.
  • Both exhibit solid profitability with ROA (return on assets) near 1.2% and ROE (return on equity) around 12%, reflecting resilience in the regional banking sector.
  • Recent stock movements saw both rise in tandem, signaling positive sector sentiment.
  • WTFC benefits from diversified segments including specialty finance, while FULT focuses on core community banking.

Introduction

Fulton Financial Corporation (FULT) and Wintrust Financial Corporation (WTFC) are prominent regional banks serving communities across the Mid-Atlantic and Midwest, respectively. This comparison analyzes their business models, recent performance, and market positioning amid evolving interest rates and economic conditions. Investors seeking exposure to regional banking—known for steady deposit growth and loan portfolios—may find value in evaluating relative momentum, profitability, and growth catalysts between these peers. Traders focused on sector rotation or dividend yields (FULT at 3.4%, WTFC at 1.4%) will appreciate insights into their head-to-head dynamics.

FULT Overview and Recent Performance

Fulton Financial Corporation (FULT) is a bank holding company offering consumer, commercial, and wealth management services through Fulton Bank, primarily in Pennsylvania, New Jersey, Maryland, and Delaware. With a market cap of $4.3 billion and shares trading around $22, FULT has seen YTD gains of 15.5% and one-year returns of 44.8%. Recent market activity shows upward momentum, including a recent session gain alongside peers, influenced by positive sector sentiment and anticipation of Q1 earnings on April 23. Key developments include the integration of Blue Foundry Bancorp following regulatory approvals, enhancing deposit base and market presence. Stable net interest income and expense controls have supported operating EPS around $0.52 in prior quarters, though analysts note potential Q1 declines amid broader funding pressures. Sentiment remains buoyed by a low P/E of 10.6 and dividend yield over 3%.

WTFC Overview and Recent Performance

Wintrust Financial Corporation (WTFC) operates as a financial holding company with community banking, specialty finance, and wealth management segments, centered in the Chicago area and surrounding states. Trading near $149 with a $10 billion market cap, WTFC posted YTD returns of 6.8% and one-year gains of 47.5%. Recent performance surged post-Q1 results, reporting record net income of $227 million (EPS $3.22, beating estimates), driven by 7% annualized loan growth, deposit expansion, and NIM (net interest margin) of 3.54%. Shares advanced in recent trading sessions amid sector strength. Provision for credit losses remained manageable at $30 million, with net charge-offs (NCO) at 14 basis points. These factors, alongside diversified revenue streams, have bolstered investor confidence, reflected in a P/E of 13.1 and analyst targets near $168.

Trending AI Robots

Tickeron’s Trending AI Robots page showcases the platform's top-performing AI trading bots, curated from over 350 bots that trade thousands of tickers across stocks, ETFs, and crypto. Only the most suitable for current volatility—spanning semiconductors, industrials, energy, and finance—earn a spot among the 25 featured. Standout bots deliver annualized returns from 30% to over 120%, win rates of 55-87%, profit factors up to 11.7, and profit-to-drawdown ratios exceeding 10 in some cases, with trade durations from minutes to days. Each employs unique strategies like swing trading, technical analysis, or multi-agent approaches on sets like NVDA, SOXL, or gold miners. Explore these high-conviction options to align with your trading style and market conditions.

Head-to-Head Comparison

Both FULT and WTFC operate in regional banking, emphasizing commercial real estate loans, deposits, and community lending, but WTFC differentiates via specialty finance (e.g., insurance premium financing) and wealth management, contributing to higher revenue scale ($2.6B TTM vs. $1.3B). Growth drivers favor WTFC with recent loan and deposit acceleration, while FULT leverages M&A (mergers and acquisitions) like Blue Foundry for expansion. Recent momentum tilts to WTFC post-earnings beat, versus FULT's pre-earnings positioning. Risk factors are comparable: interest rate sensitivity, NCO levels (low teens bps), and CRE exposure, though both maintain CET1 (Common Equity Tier 1 capital) buffers. Market sentiment aligns with sector recovery, but WTFC's size offers relative stability.

Tickeron AI Verdict

Tickeron’s AI models would likely favor WTFC in the current environment, citing superior trend consistency from record earnings, robust loan growth, and NIM expansion as key catalysts. While FULT exhibits strong YTD relative performance and attractive valuation, WTFC's scale and recent stability position it probabilistically ahead for momentum traders.

Disclaimer

The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer. Disclaimers and Limitations

VS
FULT vs. WTFC commentary
Jun 24, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FULT is a Buy and WTFC is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 24, 2026
Stock price -- (FULT: $23.05 vs. WTFC: $155.80)
Brand notoriety: FULT and WTFC are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FULT: 76% vs. WTFC: 105%
Market capitalization -- FULT: $4.52B vs. WTFC: $10.62B
FULT [@Regional Banks] is valued at $4.52B. WTFC’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $10.62B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $142.82B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $6.16B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FULT’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileWTFC’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • FULT’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • WTFC’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, FULT is a better buy in the long-term than WTFC.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FULT’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while WTFC’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • FULT’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • WTFC’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, FULT is a better buy in the short-term than WTFC.

Price Growth

FULT (@Regional Banks) experienced а +0.66% price change this week, while WTFC (@Regional Banks) price change was -0.57% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +1.31%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +5.68%, and the average quarterly price growth was +13.55%.

Reported Earning Dates

FULT is expected to report earnings on Jul 21, 2026.

WTFC is expected to report earnings on Jul 22, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+1.31% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
WTFC($10.6B) has a higher market cap than FULT($4.52B). WTFC has higher P/E ratio than FULT: WTFC (13.06) vs FULT (10.98). FULT YTD gains are higher at: 20.369 vs. WTFC (12.240). WTFC has more cash in the bank: 468M vs. FULT (271M). FULT has less debt than WTFC: FULT (1.25B) vs WTFC (4.34B). WTFC has higher revenues than FULT: WTFC (2.8B) vs FULT (1.33B).
FULTWTFCFULT / WTFC
Capitalization4.52B10.6B43%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD20.36912.240166%
P/E Ratio10.9813.0684%
Revenue1.33B2.8B47%
Total Cash271M468M58%
Total Debt1.25B4.34B29%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FULT vs WTFC: Fundamental Ratings
FULT
WTFC
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
3524
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
28
Undervalued
70
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
4324
SMR RATING
1..100
2315
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4446
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
4745
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
8550

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

FULT's Valuation (28) in the Regional Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for WTFC (70). This means that FULT’s stock grew somewhat faster than WTFC’s over the last 12 months.

WTFC's Profit vs Risk Rating (24) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as FULT (43). This means that WTFC’s stock grew similarly to FULT’s over the last 12 months.

WTFC's SMR Rating (15) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as FULT (23). This means that WTFC’s stock grew similarly to FULT’s over the last 12 months.

FULT's Price Growth Rating (44) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as WTFC (46). This means that FULT’s stock grew similarly to WTFC’s over the last 12 months.

WTFC's P/E Growth Rating (45) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as FULT (47). This means that WTFC’s stock grew similarly to FULT’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FULTWTFC
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
68%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
67%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
64%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
57%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
59%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
76%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
55%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
65%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
64%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
60%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
52%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
64%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
60%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
67%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 27 days ago
60%
Bearish Trend 23 days ago
62%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
79%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
55%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
35%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
62%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
FULT
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
WTFC
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
VUS29.840.26
+0.88%
Virtus U.S. Dividend ETF
SMN19.770.04
+0.20%
ProShares UltraShort Materials
LVHD43.000.01
+0.02%
Franklin U.S. Low Volatility Hi Div ETF
BUFR36.43-0.04
-0.11%
FT Vest Laddered Buffer ETF
KRMA47.01-0.31
-0.65%
Global X Conscious Companies ETF