FUNC
Price
$31.91
Change
-$0.19 (-0.59%)
Updated
Aug 7, 04:10 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
152.19M
81 days until earnings call
ISBA
Price
$32.41
Change
-$0.38 (-1.16%)
Updated
Aug 7, 02:54 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
154.14M
70 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

FUNC vs ISBA

Header iconFUNC vs ISBA Comparison
Open Charts FUNC vs ISBABanner chart's image
First United
Price$31.91
Change-$0.19 (-0.59%)
Volume$200
Capitalization152.19M
Isabella Bank
Price$32.41
Change-$0.38 (-1.16%)
Volume$400
Capitalization154.14M
FUNC vs ISBA Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
FUNC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
ISBA
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FUNC vs. ISBA commentary
Aug 07, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FUNC is a Hold and ISBA is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 07, 2025
Stock price -- (FUNC: $32.11 vs. ISBA: $32.80)
Brand notoriety: FUNC and ISBA are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FUNC: 23% vs. ISBA: 22%
Market capitalization -- FUNC: $152.19M vs. ISBA: $154.14M
FUNC [@Regional Banks] is valued at $152.19M. ISBA’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $154.14M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $133.96B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $6.06B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FUNC’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileISBA’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • FUNC’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • ISBA’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, ISBA is a better buy in the long-term than FUNC.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FUNC’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while ISBA’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • FUNC’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • ISBA’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, ISBA is a better buy in the short-term than FUNC.

Price Growth

FUNC (@Regional Banks) experienced а -3.54% price change this week, while ISBA (@Regional Banks) price change was +9.41% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +0.20%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -0.02%, and the average quarterly price growth was +6.89%.

Reported Earning Dates

FUNC is expected to report earnings on Oct 27, 2025.

ISBA is expected to report earnings on Oct 16, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+0.20% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
ISBA($154M) and FUNC($152M) have the same market capitalization . FUNC has higher P/E ratio than ISBA: FUNC (10.14) vs ISBA (7.11). ISBA YTD gains are higher at: 28.896 vs. FUNC (-2.726). FUNC has more cash in the bank: 86.9M vs. ISBA (22M). ISBA has less debt than FUNC: ISBA (84.3M) vs FUNC (112M). ISBA (72.7M) and FUNC (71.3M) have equivalent revenues.
FUNCISBAFUNC / ISBA
Capitalization152M154M99%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD-2.72628.896-9%
P/E Ratio10.147.11143%
Revenue71.3M72.7M98%
Total Cash86.9M22M395%
Total Debt112M84.3M133%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FUNC vs ISBA: Fundamental Ratings
FUNC
ISBA
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
723
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
53
Fair valued
68
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
3020
SMR RATING
1..100
4557
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5539
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
8315
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a27

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

FUNC's Valuation (53) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as ISBA (68) in the null industry. This means that FUNC’s stock grew similarly to ISBA’s over the last 12 months.

ISBA's Profit vs Risk Rating (20) in the null industry is in the same range as FUNC (30) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that ISBA’s stock grew similarly to FUNC’s over the last 12 months.

FUNC's SMR Rating (45) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as ISBA (57) in the null industry. This means that FUNC’s stock grew similarly to ISBA’s over the last 12 months.

ISBA's Price Growth Rating (39) in the null industry is in the same range as FUNC (55) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that ISBA’s stock grew similarly to FUNC’s over the last 12 months.

ISBA's P/E Growth Rating (15) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for FUNC (83) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that ISBA’s stock grew significantly faster than FUNC’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FUNCISBA
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
47%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
67%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
49%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
53%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
35%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
44%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
60%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
52%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
57%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
47%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
58%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 21 days ago
70%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
63%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
54%
Bearish Trend 10 days ago
40%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
63%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
43%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
58%
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
FUNC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
ISBA
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
BFLBY22.350.01
+0.04%
Bilfinger SE
RWWI15.00N/A
N/A
Rand Worldwide, Inc.
WLTNF0.52N/A
N/A
Wilton Res Inc
SSHT0.05N/A
N/A
SSHT S&T Group Ltd.
PTAIY6.05-0.10
-1.63%
PT Astra International

FUNC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FUNC has been closely correlated with SHBI. These tickers have moved in lockstep 68% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FUNC jumps, then SHBI could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FUNC
1D Price
Change %
FUNC100%
-0.56%
SHBI - FUNC
68%
Closely correlated
-0.71%
FNB - FUNC
67%
Closely correlated
-1.33%
WTFC - FUNC
67%
Closely correlated
-0.64%
UCB - FUNC
66%
Closely correlated
-0.83%
HTBK - FUNC
66%
Loosely correlated
+1.29%
More