FUNC
Price
$37.27
Change
-$0.05 (-0.13%)
Updated
Aug 28 closing price
Capitalization
242.09M
59 days until earnings call
ISBA
Price
$33.65
Change
-$0.35 (-1.03%)
Updated
Aug 28 closing price
Capitalization
247.66M
48 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

FUNC vs ISBA

Header iconFUNC vs ISBA Comparison
Open Charts FUNC vs ISBABanner chart's image
First United
Price$37.27
Change-$0.05 (-0.13%)
Volume$11.49K
Capitalization242.09M
Isabella Bank
Price$33.65
Change-$0.35 (-1.03%)
Volume$9.21K
Capitalization247.66M
FUNC vs ISBA Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
FUNC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
ISBA
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FUNC vs. ISBA commentary
Aug 29, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FUNC is a Buy and ISBA is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 29, 2025
Stock price -- (FUNC: $37.28 vs. ISBA: $33.65)
Brand notoriety: FUNC and ISBA are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FUNC: 27% vs. ISBA: 98%
Market capitalization -- FUNC: $242.09M vs. ISBA: $247.66M
FUNC [@Regional Banks] is valued at $242.09M. ISBA’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $247.66M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $167.72B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $7.85B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FUNC’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileISBA’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • FUNC’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • ISBA’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, FUNC is a better buy in the long-term than ISBA.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FUNC’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while ISBA’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • FUNC’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • ISBA’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, ISBA is a better buy in the short-term than FUNC.

Price Growth

FUNC (@Regional Banks) experienced а +8.17% price change this week, while ISBA (@Regional Banks) price change was +3.54% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +0.26%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.76%, and the average quarterly price growth was +11.81%.

Reported Earning Dates

FUNC is expected to report earnings on Oct 27, 2025.

ISBA is expected to report earnings on Oct 16, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+0.26% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
ISBA($248M) and FUNC($242M) have the same market capitalization . ISBA has higher P/E ratio than FUNC: ISBA (15.37) vs FUNC (10.21). ISBA YTD gains are higher at: 32.237 vs. FUNC (12.920). FUNC has more cash in the bank: 82.8M vs. ISBA (28.8M). ISBA has less debt than FUNC: ISBA (29.5M) vs FUNC (151M). FUNC has higher revenues than ISBA: FUNC (83.7M) vs ISBA (70.5M).
FUNCISBAFUNC / ISBA
Capitalization242M248M98%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD12.92032.23740%
P/E Ratio10.2115.3766%
Revenue83.7M70.5M119%
Total Cash82.8M28.8M288%
Total Debt151M29.5M512%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FUNC vs ISBA: Fundamental Ratings
FUNC
ISBA
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
7585
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
38
Fair valued
77
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
2521
SMR RATING
1..100
100100
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4439
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
100100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a23

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

FUNC's Valuation (38) in the Regional Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for ISBA (77) in the null industry. This means that FUNC’s stock grew somewhat faster than ISBA’s over the last 12 months.

ISBA's Profit vs Risk Rating (21) in the null industry is in the same range as FUNC (25) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that ISBA’s stock grew similarly to FUNC’s over the last 12 months.

ISBA's SMR Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as FUNC (100) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that ISBA’s stock grew similarly to FUNC’s over the last 12 months.

ISBA's Price Growth Rating (39) in the null industry is in the same range as FUNC (44) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that ISBA’s stock grew similarly to FUNC’s over the last 12 months.

ISBA's P/E Growth Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as FUNC (100) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that ISBA’s stock grew similarly to FUNC’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FUNCISBA
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
62%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
49%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
34%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
62%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
54%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
72%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
59%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
70%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
57%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
67%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
58%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
70%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
63%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
55%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
41%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
60%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
48%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
64%
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
FUNC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
ISBA
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
GMGMF0.730.02
+3.08%
Graphene Manufacturing Group Ltd.
VOPKF46.50N/A
N/A
Koninklijke Vopak NV
BLVDF0.07N/A
N/A
GlobalBlock Digital Asset Trading Limited
DNBBF26.36-0.86
-3.17%
DNB NOR BANK ASA
AMGDF1.02-0.08
-7.26%
Aston Martin Lagonda Global Holdings plc.

FUNC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FUNC has been closely correlated with FNB. These tickers have moved in lockstep 68% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FUNC jumps, then FNB could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FUNC
1D Price
Change %
FUNC100%
-0.15%
FNB - FUNC
68%
Closely correlated
-0.48%
CWBC - FUNC
68%
Closely correlated
-1.08%
UCB - FUNC
68%
Closely correlated
-0.56%
SHBI - FUNC
67%
Closely correlated
+0.06%
WTFC - FUNC
67%
Closely correlated
+0.33%
More

ISBA and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that ISBA and PMHG have been poorly correlated (+26% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that ISBA and PMHG's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To ISBA
1D Price
Change %
ISBA100%
-1.03%
PMHG - ISBA
26%
Poorly correlated
+0.50%
BVFL - ISBA
25%
Poorly correlated
N/A
FUNC - ISBA
25%
Poorly correlated
-0.15%
ORRF - ISBA
24%
Poorly correlated
-0.29%
SFBS - ISBA
24%
Poorly correlated
-0.44%
More