FUNC
Price
$36.50
Change
+$0.37 (+1.02%)
Updated
Oct 6, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
236.99M
20 days until earnings call
LARK
Price
$26.63
Change
-$0.07 (-0.26%)
Updated
Oct 6, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
153.6M
Interact to see
Advertisement

FUNC vs LARK

Header iconFUNC vs LARK Comparison
Open Charts FUNC vs LARKBanner chart's image
First United
Price$36.50
Change+$0.37 (+1.02%)
Volume$440
Capitalization236.99M
Landmark Ban
Price$26.63
Change-$0.07 (-0.26%)
Volume$222
Capitalization153.6M
FUNC vs LARK Comparison Chart in %
FUNC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
LARK
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FUNC vs. LARK commentary
Oct 07, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FUNC is a Hold and LARK is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Oct 07, 2025
Stock price -- (FUNC: $36.49 vs. LARK: $26.56)
Brand notoriety: FUNC and LARK are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FUNC: 118% vs. LARK: 126%
Market capitalization -- FUNC: $236.99M vs. LARK: $153.6M
FUNC [@Regional Banks] is valued at $236.99M. LARK’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $153.6M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $168.54B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $7.9B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FUNC’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileLARK’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • FUNC’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • LARK’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, FUNC is a better buy in the long-term than LARK.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FUNC’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while LARK’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • FUNC’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • LARK’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, LARK is a better buy in the short-term than FUNC.

Price Growth

FUNC (@Regional Banks) experienced а -0.63% price change this week, while LARK (@Regional Banks) price change was -1.23% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +0.29%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.48%, and the average quarterly price growth was +18.55%.

Reported Earning Dates

FUNC is expected to report earnings on Oct 27, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+0.29% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FUNC($237M) has a higher market cap than LARK($154M). FUNC has higher P/E ratio than LARK: FUNC (10.00) vs LARK (9.45). LARK YTD gains are higher at: 13.229 vs. FUNC (10.542). FUNC has less debt than LARK: FUNC (151M) vs LARK (177M). FUNC has higher revenues than LARK: FUNC (83.7M) vs LARK (65.4M).
FUNCLARKFUNC / LARK
Capitalization237M154M154%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD10.54213.22980%
P/E Ratio10.009.45106%
Revenue83.7M65.4M128%
Total Cash82.8MN/A-
Total Debt151M177M85%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FUNC vs LARK: Fundamental Ratings
FUNC
LARK
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
7953
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
36
Fair valued
27
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
2631
SMR RATING
1..100
4450
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4854
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
8555
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
3775

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

LARK's Valuation (27) in the Savings Banks industry is in the same range as FUNC (36) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that LARK’s stock grew similarly to FUNC’s over the last 12 months.

FUNC's Profit vs Risk Rating (26) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as LARK (31) in the Savings Banks industry. This means that FUNC’s stock grew similarly to LARK’s over the last 12 months.

FUNC's SMR Rating (44) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as LARK (50) in the Savings Banks industry. This means that FUNC’s stock grew similarly to LARK’s over the last 12 months.

FUNC's Price Growth Rating (48) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as LARK (54) in the Savings Banks industry. This means that FUNC’s stock grew similarly to LARK’s over the last 12 months.

LARK's P/E Growth Rating (55) in the Savings Banks industry is in the same range as FUNC (85) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that LARK’s stock grew similarly to FUNC’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FUNCLARK
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
58%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
65%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
59%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
56%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
49%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
44%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
39%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
52%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
47%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
47%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
51%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
70%
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
57%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
55%
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
53%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
58%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
46%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
57%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
58%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
FUNC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
LARK
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
CLPHY8.310.03
+0.30%
CLP Holdings Ltd.
UNBK64.00N/A
N/A
United National Bank (Cairo, GA)
AMDLY46.00N/A
N/A
Amada Co. Ltd.
SWDCF3.58N/A
N/A
SWEDENCARE AB
ZPHYF0.05N/A
-3.60%
Zephyr Minerals Ltd

FUNC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FUNC has been closely correlated with CWBC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 69% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FUNC jumps, then CWBC could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FUNC
1D Price
Change %
FUNC100%
+1.00%
CWBC - FUNC
69%
Closely correlated
+0.22%
SHBI - FUNC
69%
Closely correlated
+0.98%
FNB - FUNC
69%
Closely correlated
+1.35%
UCB - FUNC
68%
Closely correlated
+1.08%
HTBK - FUNC
68%
Closely correlated
+1.12%
More

LARK and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, LARK has been loosely correlated with UNB. These tickers have moved in lockstep 37% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if LARK jumps, then UNB could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To LARK
1D Price
Change %
LARK100%
-0.52%
UNB - LARK
37%
Loosely correlated
+0.44%
CBFV - LARK
35%
Loosely correlated
-1.15%
BVFL - LARK
34%
Loosely correlated
-0.45%
CFFI - LARK
33%
Loosely correlated
-1.66%
FUNC - LARK
33%
Loosely correlated
+1.00%
More