FUNC
Price
$33.81
Change
+$0.57 (+1.71%)
Updated
Jul 3 closing price
Capitalization
152.19M
23 days until earnings call
LARK
Price
$28.25
Change
+$1.18 (+4.36%)
Updated
Jul 3 closing price
Capitalization
105.44M
Interact to see
Advertisement

FUNC vs LARK

Header iconFUNC vs LARK Comparison
Open Charts FUNC vs LARKBanner chart's image
First United
Price$33.81
Change+$0.57 (+1.71%)
Volume$14.21K
Capitalization152.19M
Landmark Ban
Price$28.25
Change+$1.18 (+4.36%)
Volume$6.4K
Capitalization105.44M
FUNC vs LARK Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
FUNC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
LARK
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FUNC vs. LARK commentary
Jul 06, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FUNC is a Buy and LARK is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 06, 2025
Stock price -- (FUNC: $33.81 vs. LARK: $28.25)
Brand notoriety: FUNC and LARK are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FUNC: 38% vs. LARK: 21%
Market capitalization -- FUNC: $152.19M vs. LARK: $105.44M
FUNC [@Regional Banks] is valued at $152.19M. LARK’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $105.44M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $133.96B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $6.03B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FUNC’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileLARK’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • FUNC’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • LARK’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, LARK is a better buy in the long-term than FUNC.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FUNC’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while LARK’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • FUNC’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • LARK’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, LARK is a better buy in the short-term than FUNC.

Price Growth

FUNC (@Regional Banks) experienced а +14.07% price change this week, while LARK (@Regional Banks) price change was +14.05% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +2.86%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.85%, and the average quarterly price growth was +11.72%.

Reported Earning Dates

FUNC is expected to report earnings on Jul 28, 2025.

LARK is expected to report earnings on Apr 30, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+2.86% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FUNC($152M) has a higher market cap than LARK($105M). FUNC has higher P/E ratio than LARK: FUNC (10.14) vs LARK (8.64). LARK YTD gains are higher at: 19.489 vs. FUNC (1.767). LARK has less debt than FUNC: LARK (99M) vs FUNC (112M). FUNC has higher revenues than LARK: FUNC (71.3M) vs LARK (56.5M).
FUNCLARKFUNC / LARK
Capitalization152M105M145%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD1.76719.4899%
P/E Ratio10.148.64117%
Revenue71.3M56.5M126%
Total Cash86.9MN/A-
Total Debt112M99M113%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FUNC vs LARK: Fundamental Ratings
FUNC
LARK
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
246
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
60
Fair valued
57
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
3034
SMR RATING
1..100
3945
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4148
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
5532
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
34n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

LARK's Valuation (57) in the Savings Banks industry is in the same range as FUNC (60) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that LARK’s stock grew similarly to FUNC’s over the last 12 months.

FUNC's Profit vs Risk Rating (30) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as LARK (34) in the Savings Banks industry. This means that FUNC’s stock grew similarly to LARK’s over the last 12 months.

FUNC's SMR Rating (39) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as LARK (45) in the Savings Banks industry. This means that FUNC’s stock grew similarly to LARK’s over the last 12 months.

FUNC's Price Growth Rating (41) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as LARK (48) in the Savings Banks industry. This means that FUNC’s stock grew similarly to LARK’s over the last 12 months.

LARK's P/E Growth Rating (32) in the Savings Banks industry is in the same range as FUNC (55) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that LARK’s stock grew similarly to FUNC’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FUNCLARK
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
56%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
53%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
47%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
48%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
63%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
60%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
73%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
61%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
70%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
60%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
67%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
48%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
70%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
57%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 20 days ago
54%
Bearish Trend 13 days ago
51%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
55%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
55%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
35%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
49%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
FUNC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
LARK
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
BDOUY26.910.07
+0.24%
BDO Unibank Inc.
CYYNF0.08N/A
N/A
Cynata Therapeutics Ltd.
FGETF8.10N/A
N/A
FLIGHT CENTRE TRAVEL GROUP LTD
TDCSF9.00N/A
N/A
Tdc Software Engineering Inc.
FLMCF0.06N/A
N/A
First Lithium Minerals Corp.

FUNC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FUNC has been closely correlated with SHBI. These tickers have moved in lockstep 67% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FUNC jumps, then SHBI could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FUNC
1D Price
Change %
FUNC100%
+1.71%
SHBI - FUNC
67%
Closely correlated
+1.77%
HTBK - FUNC
66%
Closely correlated
+1.14%
PNFP - FUNC
65%
Loosely correlated
+0.71%
UCB - FUNC
65%
Loosely correlated
+1.24%
CCNE - FUNC
65%
Loosely correlated
+1.71%
More