FUNC
Price
$37.21
Change
-$0.12 (-0.32%)
Updated
Aug 28, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
242.09M
60 days until earnings call
UNB
Price
$25.81
Change
-$0.49 (-1.86%)
Updated
Aug 28, 03:24 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
118.79M
48 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

FUNC vs UNB

Header iconFUNC vs UNB Comparison
Open Charts FUNC vs UNBBanner chart's image
First United
Price$37.21
Change-$0.12 (-0.32%)
Volume$320
Capitalization242.09M
Union Bankshares
Price$25.81
Change-$0.49 (-1.86%)
Volume$1.16K
Capitalization118.79M
FUNC vs UNB Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
FUNC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
UNB
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FUNC vs. UNB commentary
Aug 29, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FUNC is a Buy and UNB is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 29, 2025
Stock price -- (FUNC: $37.33 vs. UNB: $26.30)
Brand notoriety: FUNC and UNB are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FUNC: 40% vs. UNB: 61%
Market capitalization -- FUNC: $242.09M vs. UNB: $118.79M
FUNC [@Regional Banks] is valued at $242.09M. UNB’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $118.79M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $167.72B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $7.87B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FUNC’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileUNB’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • FUNC’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • UNB’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, UNB is a better buy in the long-term than FUNC.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FUNC’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while UNB’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • FUNC’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • UNB’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, FUNC is a better buy in the short-term than UNB.

Price Growth

FUNC (@Regional Banks) experienced а +7.55% price change this week, while UNB (@Regional Banks) price change was -2.05% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +2.11%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.01%, and the average quarterly price growth was +11.64%.

Reported Earning Dates

FUNC is expected to report earnings on Oct 27, 2025.

UNB is expected to report earnings on Oct 15, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+2.11% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FUNC($242M) has a higher market cap than UNB($119M). UNB has higher P/E ratio than FUNC: UNB (12.99) vs FUNC (10.21). FUNC YTD gains are higher at: 13.087 vs. UNB (-5.880). FUNC has more cash in the bank: 82.8M vs. UNB (4.77M). FUNC has less debt than UNB: FUNC (151M) vs UNB (287M). FUNC has higher revenues than UNB: FUNC (83.7M) vs UNB (49M).
FUNCUNBFUNC / UNB
Capitalization242M119M203%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD13.087-5.880-223%
P/E Ratio10.2112.9979%
Revenue83.7M49M171%
Total Cash82.8M4.77M1,735%
Total Debt151M287M53%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FUNC vs UNB: Fundamental Ratings
FUNC
UNB
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
748
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
38
Fair valued
40
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
2545
SMR RATING
1..100
4448
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4461
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
7744
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

FUNC's Valuation (38) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as UNB (40). This means that FUNC’s stock grew similarly to UNB’s over the last 12 months.

FUNC's Profit vs Risk Rating (25) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as UNB (45). This means that FUNC’s stock grew similarly to UNB’s over the last 12 months.

FUNC's SMR Rating (44) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as UNB (48). This means that FUNC’s stock grew similarly to UNB’s over the last 12 months.

FUNC's Price Growth Rating (44) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as UNB (61). This means that FUNC’s stock grew similarly to UNB’s over the last 12 months.

UNB's P/E Growth Rating (44) in the Regional Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FUNC (77). This means that UNB’s stock grew somewhat faster than FUNC’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FUNCUNB
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
54%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
47%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
83%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
66%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
60%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
69%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
56%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
70%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
60%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
67%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
57%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
70%
Bullish Trend 16 days ago
73%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 11 days ago
55%
Bearish Trend 10 days ago
63%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
58%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
63%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
60%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
FUNC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
UNB
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
FLNCF0.220.05
+33.09%
Freelancer Limited
SNRG0.05N/A
+2.70%
Susglobal Energy Corp.
WEBJF0.93N/A
N/A
WEB TRAVEL GROUP LTD
FOSUF0.50N/A
N/A
Fosun International, Ltd.
NTDTY26.34-0.51
-1.90%
NTT DATA GROUP CORPORATION

FUNC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FUNC has been closely correlated with FNB. These tickers have moved in lockstep 68% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FUNC jumps, then FNB could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FUNC
1D Price
Change %
FUNC100%
+0.27%
FNB - FUNC
68%
Closely correlated
+1.57%
CWBC - FUNC
68%
Closely correlated
-0.05%
UCB - FUNC
68%
Closely correlated
+1.69%
SHBI - FUNC
67%
Closely correlated
+1.12%
WTFC - FUNC
67%
Closely correlated
+0.98%
More

UNB and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, UNB has been loosely correlated with UBFO. These tickers have moved in lockstep 38% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if UNB jumps, then UBFO could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To UNB
1D Price
Change %
UNB100%
-2.74%
UBFO - UNB
38%
Loosely correlated
+2.15%
CFFI - UNB
36%
Loosely correlated
+0.65%
FXNC - UNB
35%
Loosely correlated
-0.38%
FUNC - UNB
34%
Loosely correlated
+0.27%
MRBK - UNB
34%
Loosely correlated
+0.32%
More