FUNC
Price
$28.90
Change
-$0.78 (-2.63%)
Updated
Jun 13 closing price
Capitalization
152.19M
44 days until earnings call
UNB
Price
$28.15
Change
-$0.23 (-0.81%)
Updated
Jun 13 closing price
Capitalization
137.84M
32 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

FUNC vs UNB

Header iconFUNC vs UNB Comparison
Open Charts FUNC vs UNBBanner chart's image
First United
Price$28.90
Change-$0.78 (-2.63%)
Volume$20.72K
Capitalization152.19M
Union Bankshares
Price$28.15
Change-$0.23 (-0.81%)
Volume$6.09K
Capitalization137.84M
FUNC vs UNB Comparison Chart
Loading...
FUNC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
UNB
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FUNC vs. UNB commentary
Jun 14, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FUNC is a StrongBuy and UNB is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 14, 2025
Stock price -- (FUNC: $28.90 vs. UNB: $28.15)
Brand notoriety: FUNC and UNB are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FUNC: 134% vs. UNB: 60%
Market capitalization -- FUNC: $152.19M vs. UNB: $137.84M
FUNC [@Regional Banks] is valued at $152.19M. UNB’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $137.84M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $133.96B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $6.02B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FUNC’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileUNB’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • FUNC’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • UNB’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, FUNC is a better buy in the long-term than UNB.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FUNC’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while UNB’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • FUNC’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 6 bearish.
  • UNB’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, UNB is a better buy in the short-term than FUNC.

Price Growth

FUNC (@Regional Banks) experienced а -3.00% price change this week, while UNB (@Regional Banks) price change was -1.87% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was -0.53%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -0.00%, and the average quarterly price growth was +3.95%.

Reported Earning Dates

FUNC is expected to report earnings on Jul 28, 2025.

UNB is expected to report earnings on Jul 16, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (-0.53% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FUNC($152M) has a higher market cap than UNB($138M). UNB has higher P/E ratio than FUNC: UNB (12.33) vs FUNC (10.14). UNB YTD gains are higher at: -0.523 vs. FUNC (-13.012). FUNC has more cash in the bank: 86.9M vs. UNB (4.35M). UNB has less debt than FUNC: UNB (81.9M) vs FUNC (112M). FUNC has higher revenues than UNB: FUNC (71.3M) vs UNB (46.8M).
FUNCUNBFUNC / UNB
Capitalization152M138M110%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD-13.012-0.5232,489%
P/E Ratio10.1412.3382%
Revenue71.3M46.8M152%
Total Cash86.9M4.35M1,997%
Total Debt112M81.9M137%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FUNC vs UNB: Fundamental Ratings
FUNC
UNB
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
6053
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
45
Fair valued
90
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
3938
SMR RATING
1..100
1619
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5562
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
6415
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

FUNC's Valuation (45) in the Regional Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for UNB (90). This means that FUNC’s stock grew somewhat faster than UNB’s over the last 12 months.

UNB's Profit vs Risk Rating (38) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as FUNC (39). This means that UNB’s stock grew similarly to FUNC’s over the last 12 months.

FUNC's SMR Rating (16) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as UNB (19). This means that FUNC’s stock grew similarly to UNB’s over the last 12 months.

FUNC's Price Growth Rating (55) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as UNB (62). This means that FUNC’s stock grew similarly to UNB’s over the last 12 months.

UNB's P/E Growth Rating (15) in the Regional Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FUNC (64). This means that UNB’s stock grew somewhat faster than FUNC’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FUNCUNB
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
75%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
65%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
60%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
51%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
61%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
53%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
65%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
51%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
57%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
46%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
55%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 9 days ago
71%
Bullish Trend 10 days ago
73%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
54%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
59%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
65%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
71%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
45%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
78%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
FUNC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
UNB
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
FEAAX53.02N/A
N/A
Fidelity Advisor Emerging Asia A
BEGIX21.95N/A
N/A
Sterling Capital Equity Income Instl
RYCRX32.46N/A
N/A
Rydex Real Estate C
SVFYX75.70N/A
N/A
Smead Value Y
NAIGX32.82-0.43
-1.29%
Nuveen International Value A

FUNC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FUNC has been closely correlated with HTBK. These tickers have moved in lockstep 66% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FUNC jumps, then HTBK could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FUNC
1D Price
Change %
FUNC100%
-2.63%
HTBK - FUNC
66%
Closely correlated
-2.62%
EFSC - FUNC
66%
Closely correlated
-2.19%
PNFP - FUNC
66%
Closely correlated
-3.28%
UCB - FUNC
66%
Loosely correlated
-2.22%
SHBI - FUNC
65%
Loosely correlated
-4.51%
More

UNB and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, UNB has been loosely correlated with RNST. These tickers have moved in lockstep 34% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if UNB jumps, then RNST could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To UNB
1D Price
Change %
UNB100%
-0.81%
RNST - UNB
34%
Loosely correlated
-2.62%
FXNC - UNB
34%
Loosely correlated
-3.43%
FCCO - UNB
34%
Loosely correlated
-3.06%
CBFV - UNB
33%
Loosely correlated
-1.46%
FUNC - UNB
33%
Loosely correlated
-2.63%
More