FUNTF
Price
Loading...
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Loading...
Capitalization
2.31M
VMCUF
Price
$11.00
Change
+$0.19 (+1.76%)
Updated
Apr 24 closing price
Capitalization
N/A
Interact to see
Advertisement

FUNTF vs VMCUF

Header iconFUNTF vs VMCUF Comparison
Open Charts FUNTF vs VMCUFBanner chart's image
FOUNTAINHALL CAP
PriceLoading...
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Capitalization2.31M
Valuence Merger Corp I
Price$11.00
Change+$0.19 (+1.76%)
Volume$188
CapitalizationN/A
FUNTF vs VMCUF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FUNTF vs. VMCUF commentary
Jul 27, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FUNTF is a Hold and VMCUF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 27, 2025
Stock price -- (FUNTF: $0.25 vs. VMCUF: $11.00)
Brand notoriety: FUNTF and VMCUF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Financial Conglomerates industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FUNTF: 100% vs. VMCUF: 100%
Market capitalization -- FUNTF: $2.31M vs. VMCUF: $0
FUNTF [@Financial Conglomerates] is valued at $2.31M. VMCUF’s [@Financial Conglomerates] market capitalization is $0. The market cap for tickers in the [@Financial Conglomerates] industry ranges from $590.24B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Financial Conglomerates] industry is $4.88B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FUNTF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileVMCUF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • FUNTF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • VMCUF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, VMCUF is a better buy in the long-term than FUNTF.

Price Growth

FUNTF (@Financial Conglomerates) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while VMCUF (@Financial Conglomerates) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Financial Conglomerates industry was +0.92%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +7.64%, and the average quarterly price growth was +90.85%.

Reported Earning Dates

VMCUF is expected to report earnings on May 15, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Financial Conglomerates (+0.92% weekly)

Financial conglomerates usually encompass a wide range of financial services including (not necessarily limited to) investment banking, insurance, capital raising/underwriting, trading of financial securities, investment advisory services, wealth management of high net-worth individuals, and retail banking. Think Citigroup, American Express Company, ING Group.

FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FUNTF YTD gains are higher at: 0.000 vs. VMCUF (-3.846). FUNTF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): -85.59K vs. VMCUF (-1.39M). VMCUF has more cash in the bank: 685K vs. FUNTF (380K). FUNTF (0) and VMCUF (0) have equivalent revenues.
FUNTFVMCUFFUNTF / VMCUF
Capitalization2.31MN/A-
EBITDA-85.59K-1.39M6%
Gain YTD0.000-3.846-
P/E RatioN/AN/A-
Revenue00-
Total Cash380K685K55%
Total DebtN/A2.26M-
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FUNTFVMCUF
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
8%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
20%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
8%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
20%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
TCMD10.550.30
+2.93%
Tactile Systems Technology
GEG2.170.03
+1.40%
Great Elm Group
RBC388.373.35
+0.87%
RBC Bearings
DAC92.240.02
+0.02%
Danaos Corp
VIASP25.25N/A
N/A
Via Renewables

FUNTF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that FUNTF and VMCUF have been poorly correlated (+0% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that FUNTF and VMCUF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FUNTF
1D Price
Change %
FUNTF100%
N/A
VMCUF - FUNTF
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CSLMF - FUNTF
-13%
Poorly correlated
N/A

VMCUF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, VMCUF has been loosely correlated with SZZLU. These tickers have moved in lockstep 43% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if VMCUF jumps, then SZZLU could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To VMCUF
1D Price
Change %
VMCUF100%
N/A
SZZLU - VMCUF
43%
Loosely correlated
+0.49%
MTLK - VMCUF
37%
Loosely correlated
N/A
ABVN - VMCUF
29%
Poorly correlated
N/A
OAKUU - VMCUF
25%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CSLUF - VMCUF
22%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More