FURCF
Price
$9.90
Change
+$2.40 (+32.00%)
Updated
May 29 closing price
Capitalization
4.96B
MGA
Price
$36.28
Change
-$0.08 (-0.22%)
Updated
May 30 closing price
Capitalization
15.65B
61 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

FURCF vs MGA

Header iconFURCF vs MGA Comparison
Open Charts FURCF vs MGABanner chart's image
FORVIA SE
Price$9.90
Change+$2.40 (+32.00%)
Volume$1.09K
Capitalization4.96B
Magna International
Price$36.28
Change-$0.08 (-0.22%)
Volume$1.96M
Capitalization15.65B
FURCF vs MGA Comparison Chart
Loading...
MGA
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FURCF vs. MGA commentary
Jun 01, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FURCF is a Hold and MGA is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 01, 2025
Stock price -- (FURCF: $9.90 vs. MGA: $36.28)
Brand notoriety: FURCF and MGA are both not notable
Both companies represent the Auto Parts: OEM industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FURCF: 365% vs. MGA: 94%
Market capitalization -- FURCF: $4.96B vs. MGA: $15.65B
FURCF [@Auto Parts: OEM] is valued at $4.96B. MGA’s [@Auto Parts: OEM] market capitalization is $15.65B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Auto Parts: OEM] industry ranges from $52.56B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Auto Parts: OEM] industry is $5.62B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FURCF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileMGA’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • FURCF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • MGA’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, FURCF is a better buy in the long-term than MGA.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

MGA’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • MGA’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.

Price Growth

FURCF (@Auto Parts: OEM) experienced а +32.00% price change this week, while MGA (@Auto Parts: OEM) price change was +2.34% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Auto Parts: OEM industry was +3.52%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +9.56%, and the average quarterly price growth was +8.21%.

Reported Earning Dates

MGA is expected to report earnings on Aug 01, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Auto Parts: OEM (+3.52% weekly)

OEM or Original Equipment Manufacturer of auto parts refers to the original producer of a vehicles components, and so OEM car parts are usually identical to the parts used in producing the vehicle in the first place. OEM parts tend to fit the specifications of a particular model, and their compatibility is often guaranteed by the automaker itself. OEM parts could be more expensive to buy (compared to other vendors’ products) when a consumer goes for replacement. However, increased competition from aftermarket parts/third-party vendors could, in some cases, keep EOM prices in check. The industry might progress further in adopting newer technologies like 3D printing to boost supply chain performance and quality. Aptiv PLC, Magna International Inc. and BorgWarner Inc. are major OEMs for autos.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MGA($15.7B) has a higher market cap than FURCF($4.96B). FURCF has higher P/E ratio than MGA: FURCF (153.85) vs MGA (12.61). FURCF YTD gains are higher at: 13.078 vs. MGA (-10.849). MGA has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 3.6B vs. FURCF (2.32B). FURCF has more cash in the bank: 3.52B vs. MGA (1.2B). MGA has less debt than FURCF: MGA (7.22B) vs FURCF (11.5B). MGA has higher revenues than FURCF: MGA (42.8B) vs FURCF (27.8B).
FURCFMGAFURCF / MGA
Capitalization4.96B15.7B32%
EBITDA2.32B3.6B65%
Gain YTD13.078-10.849-121%
P/E Ratio153.8512.611,220%
Revenue27.8B42.8B65%
Total Cash3.52B1.2B294%
Total Debt11.5B7.22B159%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FURCF vs MGA: Fundamental Ratings
FURCF
MGA
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5058
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
6
Undervalued
7
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10088
SMR RATING
1..100
9968
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4258
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
9183
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

FURCF's Valuation (6) in the null industry is in the same range as MGA (7) in the Auto Parts OEM industry. This means that FURCF’s stock grew similarly to MGA’s over the last 12 months.

MGA's Profit vs Risk Rating (88) in the Auto Parts OEM industry is in the same range as FURCF (100) in the null industry. This means that MGA’s stock grew similarly to FURCF’s over the last 12 months.

MGA's SMR Rating (68) in the Auto Parts OEM industry is in the same range as FURCF (99) in the null industry. This means that MGA’s stock grew similarly to FURCF’s over the last 12 months.

FURCF's Price Growth Rating (42) in the null industry is in the same range as MGA (58) in the Auto Parts OEM industry. This means that FURCF’s stock grew similarly to MGA’s over the last 12 months.

MGA's P/E Growth Rating (83) in the Auto Parts OEM industry is in the same range as FURCF (91) in the null industry. This means that MGA’s stock grew similarly to FURCF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
MGA
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
59%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
81%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
72%
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
67%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
70%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 20 days ago
63%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
69%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
73%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
65%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
MGA
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
DBX28.860.19
+0.66%
Dropbox
MULTI.X0.5141920.002137
+0.42%
Multichain cryptocurrency
GDOT9.24-0.12
-1.28%
Green Dot Corp
RKT12.75-0.32
-2.45%
Rocket Companies
TMQ1.19-0.05
-4.03%
Trilogy Metals

FURCF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FURCF has been loosely correlated with VLEEY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 34% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if FURCF jumps, then VLEEY could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FURCF
1D Price
Change %
FURCF100%
N/A
VLEEY - FURCF
34%
Loosely correlated
-0.23%
AKBIF - FURCF
24%
Poorly correlated
N/A
MGA - FURCF
23%
Poorly correlated
-0.22%
AXL - FURCF
22%
Poorly correlated
-1.57%
VLEEF - FURCF
20%
Poorly correlated
+6.23%
More

MGA and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MGA has been closely correlated with LEA. These tickers have moved in lockstep 80% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if MGA jumps, then LEA could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MGA
1D Price
Change %
MGA100%
-0.22%
LEA - MGA
80%
Closely correlated
-0.87%
ADNT - MGA
73%
Closely correlated
-2.44%
BWA - MGA
70%
Closely correlated
-1.08%
ALV - MGA
69%
Closely correlated
-1.75%
THRM - MGA
65%
Loosely correlated
-1.95%
More