FURCF
Price
$13.42
Change
-$0.60 (-4.28%)
Updated
Aug 28 closing price
Capitalization
2.38B
MGA
Price
$45.80
Change
-$0.15 (-0.33%)
Updated
Aug 29, 04:09 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
12.88B
63 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

FURCF vs MGA

Header iconFURCF vs MGA Comparison
Open Charts FURCF vs MGABanner chart's image
FORVIA SE
Price$13.42
Change-$0.60 (-4.28%)
Volume$191
Capitalization2.38B
Magna International
Price$45.80
Change-$0.15 (-0.33%)
Volume$575
Capitalization12.88B
FURCF vs MGA Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
FURCF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MGA
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FURCF vs. MGA commentary
Aug 30, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FURCF is a Hold and MGA is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 30, 2025
Stock price -- (FURCF: $13.42 vs. MGA: $45.95)
Brand notoriety: FURCF and MGA are both not notable
Both companies represent the Auto Parts: OEM industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FURCF: 6% vs. MGA: 74%
Market capitalization -- FURCF: $2.38B vs. MGA: $12.88B
FURCF [@Auto Parts: OEM] is valued at $2.38B. MGA’s [@Auto Parts: OEM] market capitalization is $12.88B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Auto Parts: OEM] industry ranges from $88.24B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Auto Parts: OEM] industry is $6.54B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FURCF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileMGA’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • FURCF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • MGA’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, both FURCF and MGA are a bad buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FURCF’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MGA’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • FURCF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • MGA’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, MGA is a better buy in the short-term than FURCF.

Price Growth

FURCF (@Auto Parts: OEM) experienced а -0.94% price change this week, while MGA (@Auto Parts: OEM) price change was +3.96% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Auto Parts: OEM industry was +0.96%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +10.54%, and the average quarterly price growth was +23.75%.

Reported Earning Dates

MGA is expected to report earnings on Oct 31, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Auto Parts: OEM (+0.96% weekly)

OEM or Original Equipment Manufacturer of auto parts refers to the original producer of a vehicles components, and so OEM car parts are usually identical to the parts used in producing the vehicle in the first place. OEM parts tend to fit the specifications of a particular model, and their compatibility is often guaranteed by the automaker itself. OEM parts could be more expensive to buy (compared to other vendors’ products) when a consumer goes for replacement. However, increased competition from aftermarket parts/third-party vendors could, in some cases, keep EOM prices in check. The industry might progress further in adopting newer technologies like 3D printing to boost supply chain performance and quality. Aptiv PLC, Magna International Inc. and BorgWarner Inc. are major OEMs for autos.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MGA($12.9B) has a higher market cap than FURCF($2.38B). MGA has higher P/E ratio than FURCF: MGA (10.79) vs FURCF (7.33). FURCF YTD gains are higher at: 53.312 vs. MGA (14.150). MGA has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 4.04B vs. FURCF (2.2B). FURCF has more cash in the bank: 4.4B vs. MGA (1.54B). MGA has less debt than FURCF: MGA (8.12B) vs FURCF (10.8B). MGA has higher revenues than FURCF: MGA (41.6B) vs FURCF (26.9B).
FURCFMGAFURCF / MGA
Capitalization2.38B12.9B18%
EBITDA2.2B4.04B54%
Gain YTD53.31214.150377%
P/E Ratio7.3310.7968%
Revenue26.9B41.6B65%
Total Cash4.4B1.54B287%
Total Debt10.8B8.12B133%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FURCF vs MGA: Fundamental Ratings
FURCF
MGA
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
3181
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
7
Undervalued
13
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10088
SMR RATING
1..100
100100
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4042
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
100100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a90

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

FURCF's Valuation (7) in the null industry is in the same range as MGA (13) in the Auto Parts OEM industry. This means that FURCF’s stock grew similarly to MGA’s over the last 12 months.

MGA's Profit vs Risk Rating (88) in the Auto Parts OEM industry is in the same range as FURCF (100) in the null industry. This means that MGA’s stock grew similarly to FURCF’s over the last 12 months.

MGA's SMR Rating (100) in the Auto Parts OEM industry is in the same range as FURCF (100) in the null industry. This means that MGA’s stock grew similarly to FURCF’s over the last 12 months.

FURCF's Price Growth Rating (40) in the null industry is in the same range as MGA (42) in the Auto Parts OEM industry. This means that FURCF’s stock grew similarly to MGA’s over the last 12 months.

FURCF's P/E Growth Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as MGA (100) in the Auto Parts OEM industry. This means that FURCF’s stock grew similarly to MGA’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FURCFMGA
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
60%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
69%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
69%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
67%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
62%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
67%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
56%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
56%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
65%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
69%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
59%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
73%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
64%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
69%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
72%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
68%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
58%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
65%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
FURCF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MGA
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
RGLBX26.640.10
+0.38%
American Funds Global Insight R-2
BUFIX23.51N/A
N/A
Buffalo International
SEVSX43.47N/A
N/A
NAA SMid Cap Value C
WWSCX17.95N/A
N/A
Keeley Small Cap Fund C
GKIRX27.24N/A
N/A
Goldman Sachs Income Builder Inv

FURCF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FURCF has been loosely correlated with VLEEY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 34% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if FURCF jumps, then VLEEY could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FURCF
1D Price
Change %
FURCF100%
-4.26%
VLEEY - FURCF
34%
Loosely correlated
-0.17%
AKBIF - FURCF
24%
Poorly correlated
N/A
MGA - FURCF
23%
Poorly correlated
-0.73%
AXL - FURCF
22%
Poorly correlated
-0.67%
VLEEF - FURCF
20%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

MGA and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MGA has been closely correlated with LEA. These tickers have moved in lockstep 78% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if MGA jumps, then LEA could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MGA
1D Price
Change %
MGA100%
-0.73%
LEA - MGA
78%
Closely correlated
-0.37%
ADNT - MGA
73%
Closely correlated
-1.88%
ALV - MGA
71%
Closely correlated
+0.17%
BWA - MGA
71%
Closely correlated
-1.42%
THRM - MGA
65%
Loosely correlated
-0.86%
More