FUSB
Price
$12.34
Change
-$0.62 (-4.78%)
Updated
Jan 17 closing price
Capitalization
53.59M
4 days until earnings call
WDFN
Price
$22.00
Change
+$0.08 (+0.36%)
Updated
Jan 17 closing price
Capitalization
47.06M
Ad is loading...

FUSB vs WDFN

Header iconFUSB vs WDFN Comparison
Open Charts FUSB vs WDFNBanner chart's image
First US Bancshares
Price$12.34
Change-$0.62 (-4.78%)
Volume$582
Capitalization53.59M
Woodlands Financial Services
Price$22.00
Change+$0.08 (+0.36%)
Volume$100
Capitalization47.06M
FUSB vs WDFN Comparison Chart
Loading...
FUSB
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
WDFN
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FUSB vs. WDFN commentary
Jan 19, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FUSB is a Hold and WDFN is a Hold.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jan 19, 2025
Stock price -- (FUSB: $12.34 vs. WDFN: $22.00)
Brand notoriety: FUSB and WDFN are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FUSB: 15% vs. WDFN: 13%
Market capitalization -- FUSB: $53.59M vs. WDFN: $47.06M
FUSB [@Regional Banks] is valued at $53.59M. WDFN’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $47.06M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $133.96B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $5.88B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FUSB’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileWDFN’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • FUSB’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • WDFN’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, FUSB is a better buy in the long-term than WDFN.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FUSB’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while WDFN’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • FUSB’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • WDFN’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 2 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, WDFN is a better buy in the short-term than FUSB.

Price Growth

FUSB (@Regional Banks) experienced а -3.73% price change this week, while WDFN (@Regional Banks) price change was +9.07% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +3.11%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.42%, and the average quarterly price growth was +11.25%.

Reported Earning Dates

FUSB is expected to report earnings on Jan 23, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+3.11% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FUSB($53.6M) has a higher market cap than WDFN($47.1M). WDFN YTD gains are higher at: 10.000 vs. FUSB (-1.986). FUSB has more cash in the bank: 10.3M vs. WDFN (7.33M). WDFN has less debt than FUSB: WDFN (14M) vs FUSB (20.8M). FUSB has higher revenues than WDFN: FUSB (40.7M) vs WDFN (18.1M).
FUSBWDFNFUSB / WDFN
Capitalization53.6M47.1M114%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD-1.98610.000-20%
P/E Ratio6.65N/A-
Revenue40.7M18.1M225%
Total Cash10.3M7.33M141%
Total Debt20.8M14M149%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FUSB vs WDFN: Fundamental Ratings
FUSB
WDFN
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
6450
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
19
Undervalued
19
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
61100
SMR RATING
1..100
5293
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4643
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
4250
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

FUSB's Valuation (19) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as WDFN (19) in the null industry. This means that FUSB’s stock grew similarly to WDFN’s over the last 12 months.

FUSB's Profit vs Risk Rating (61) in the Regional Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for WDFN (100) in the null industry. This means that FUSB’s stock grew somewhat faster than WDFN’s over the last 12 months.

FUSB's SMR Rating (52) in the Regional Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for WDFN (93) in the null industry. This means that FUSB’s stock grew somewhat faster than WDFN’s over the last 12 months.

WDFN's Price Growth Rating (43) in the null industry is in the same range as FUSB (46) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that WDFN’s stock grew similarly to FUSB’s over the last 12 months.

FUSB's P/E Growth Rating (42) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as WDFN (50) in the null industry. This means that FUSB’s stock grew similarly to WDFN’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FUSBWDFN
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
50%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
64%
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
37%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
55%
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
52%
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
35%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
56%
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
47%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
60%
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
30%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 17 days ago
64%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 20 days ago
56%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
48%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
63%
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
FUSB
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
WDFN
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
DFUV42.590.28
+0.66%
Dimensional US Marketwide Value ETF
RWK121.330.60
+0.50%
Invesco S&P MidCap 400 Revenue ETF
VSDA51.590.22
+0.43%
VictoryShares Dividend Accelerator ETF
MIG21.080.03
+0.15%
VanEck IG Corporate ETF
DUST58.20-0.60
-1.02%
Direxion Daily Gold Miners Bear 2X ETF

FUSB and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that FUSB and IROQ have been poorly correlated (+28% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that FUSB and IROQ's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FUSB
1D Price
Change %
FUSB100%
-4.78%
IROQ - FUSB
28%
Poorly correlated
+3.11%
FCNCA - FUSB
25%
Poorly correlated
+1.53%
HFBL - FUSB
24%
Poorly correlated
-4.98%
FSEA - FUSB
24%
Poorly correlated
N/A
PBHC - FUSB
24%
Poorly correlated
+1.73%
More

WDFN and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that WDFN and PRMY have been poorly correlated (+24% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that WDFN and PRMY's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To WDFN
1D Price
Change %
WDFN100%
+0.36%
PRMY - WDFN
24%
Poorly correlated
N/A
BANC - WDFN
22%
Poorly correlated
+2.02%
KNFSF - WDFN
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
DB - WDFN
21%
Poorly correlated
+1.65%
FUSB - WDFN
20%
Poorly correlated
-4.78%
More