Ad is loading...
FVATX vs MDXBX
FVATX vs MDXBX Comparison
Open Charts FVATX vs MDXBX
Nuveen VA Municipal Bond A
Price$9.93
Change+$0.03 (+0.30%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets513.34M
T. Rowe Price Maryland Tax-Free Bond
Price$9.77
Change+$0.02 (+0.21%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.29B
FVATX vs MDXBX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FVATX vs. MDXBX commentary
Apr 28, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FVATX is a Hold and MDXBX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MDXBX has more cash in the bank: 2.29B vs. FVATX (513M). FVATX (3.44) and MDXBX (3.35) have matching dividends . FVATX was incepted earlier than MDXBX: FVATX (39 years) vs MDXBX (38 years). FVATX (0.80) is less costly to investors than MDXBX (0.53). MDXBX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 25.70 vs. FVATX (20.00). FVATX (2500) and MDXBX (2500) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. MDXBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 1.80 vs. FVATX (0.60). MDXBX return over 5 years is better than : 5.11 vs. FVATX (3.06).
| FVATX | MDXBX | FVATX / MDXBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.75 | 0.49 | 153% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.80 | 0.53 | 151% |
| Fund Existence | 39 years | 38 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -2.675 | -2.273 | 118% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 2500 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 513M | 2.29B | 22% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.44 | 3.35 | 103% |
| Returns for 1 year | 0.60 | 1.80 | 33% |
| Returns for 3 years | 4.44 | 5.35 | 83% |
| Returns for 5 years | 3.06 | 5.11 | 60% |
| Returns for 10 years | 8.92 | 10.99 | 81% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers