Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FVATX vs MDXBX
FVATX vs MDXBX Comparison
Open Charts FVATX vs MDXBX
Nuveen VA Municipal Bond A
Price$9.89
Change+$0.01 (+0.10%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets516.09M
T. Rowe Price Maryland Tax-Free Bond
Price$9.74
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.27B
FVATX vs MDXBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FVATX vs. MDXBX commentary
Aug 30, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FVATX is a Hold and MDXBX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MDXBX has more cash in the bank: 2.28B vs. FVATX (516M). FVATX (3.57) and MDXBX (3.51) have matching dividends . FVATX was incepted earlier than MDXBX: FVATX (39 years) vs MDXBX (38 years). FVATX (0.80) is less costly to investors than MDXBX (0.53). FVATX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 20.00 vs. MDXBX (17.30). FVATX (2500) and MDXBX (2500) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. MDXBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -0.91 vs. FVATX (-1.85). MDXBX return over 5 years is better than : 2.16 vs. FVATX (-1.30).
| FVATX | MDXBX | FVATX / MDXBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.75 | 0.49 | 153% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.80 | 0.53 | 151% |
| Fund Existence | 39 years | 38 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -1.992 | -1.398 | 143% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 2500 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 516M | 2.28B | 23% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.57 | 3.51 | 102% |
| Returns for 1 year | -1.85 | -0.91 | 204% |
| Returns for 3 years | 5.70 | 7.23 | 79% |
| Returns for 5 years | -1.30 | 2.16 | -60% |
| Returns for 10 years | 10.67 | 12.81 | 83% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement