Ad is loading...
FVATX vs MSNCX
FVATX vs MSNCX Comparison
Open Charts FVATX vs MSNCX
Nuveen VA Municipal Bond A
Price$9.94
Change-$0.01 (-0.10%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets519.27M
MFS NC Municipal Bond A
Price$10.50
Change-$0.02 (-0.19%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets451.12M
FVATX vs MSNCX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FVATX vs. MSNCX commentary
May 15, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FVATX is a Hold and MSNCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FVATX has more cash in the bank: 519M vs. MSNCX (451M). FVATX pays higher dividends than MSNCX: FVATX (3.48) vs MSNCX (3.22). FVATX was incepted earlier than MSNCX: FVATX (39 years) vs MSNCX (41 years). MSNCX (0.86) is less costly to investors than FVATX (0.80). MSNCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 25.00 vs. FVATX (20.00). MSNCX (4%) and FVATX (4%) have equivalent initial investment costs. MSNCX has a lower initial minimum investment than FVATX: MSNCX (1000) vs FVATX (2500). MSNCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 0.61 vs. FVATX (-0.26). MSNCX return over 5 years is better than : 4.74 vs. FVATX (2.41).
| FVATX | MSNCX | FVATX / MSNCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.75 | 0.84 | 89% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.80 | 0.86 | 93% |
| Fund Existence | 39 years | 41 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -2.193 | -1.736 | 126% |
| Front Load | 4% | 4% | 99% |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 1000 | 250% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 519M | 451M | 115% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.48 | 3.22 | 108% |
| Returns for 1 year | -0.26 | 0.61 | -43% |
| Returns for 3 years | 7.02 | 6.78 | 104% |
| Returns for 5 years | 2.41 | 4.74 | 51% |
| Returns for 10 years | 10.45 | 12.06 | 87% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...