FVCB
Price
$16.86
Change
+$0.23 (+1.38%)
Updated
Jun 22 closing price
Capitalization
303.25M
30 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
SFNC
Price
$22.17
Change
+$0.27 (+1.23%)
Updated
Jun 22 closing price
Capitalization
3.22B
35 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

FVCB vs SFNC

FVCB vs SFNC Comparison Chart in %
loading
loading
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FVCB vs. SFNC commentary
Jun 23, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FVCB is a Buy and SFNC is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 23, 2026
Stock price -- (FVCB: $16.85 vs. SFNC: $22.18)
Brand notoriety: FVCB and SFNC are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FVCB: 151% vs. SFNC: 112%
Market capitalization -- FVCB: $303.25M vs. SFNC: $3.22B
FVCB [@Regional Banks] is valued at $303.25M. SFNC’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $3.22B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $142.82B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $6.16B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FVCB’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileSFNC’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • FVCB’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • SFNC’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, FVCB is a better buy in the long-term than SFNC.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FVCB’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SFNC’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • FVCB’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • SFNC’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, both FVCB and SFNC are a good buy in the short-term.

Price Growth

FVCB (@Regional Banks) experienced а +1.69% price change this week, while SFNC (@Regional Banks) price change was +0.82% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +0.31%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.37%, and the average quarterly price growth was +12.10%.

Reported Earning Dates

FVCB is expected to report earnings on Jul 23, 2026.

SFNC is expected to report earnings on Jul 28, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+0.31% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SFNC($3.22B) has a higher market cap than FVCB($303M). SFNC (13.73) and FVCB (13.16) have similar P/E ratio . FVCB YTD gains are higher at: 22.171 vs. SFNC (20.167). SFNC has more cash in the bank: 343M vs. FVCB (5.68M). FVCB has less debt than SFNC: FVCB (30.5M) vs SFNC (762M). SFNC has higher revenues than FVCB: SFNC (126M) vs FVCB (68.6M).
FVCBSFNCFVCB / SFNC
Capitalization303M3.22B9%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD22.17120.167110%
P/E Ratio13.1613.7396%
Revenue68.6M126M54%
Total Cash5.68M343M2%
Total Debt30.5M762M4%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FVCB vs SFNC: Fundamental Ratings
FVCB
SFNC
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
4141
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
70
Overvalued
90
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
78100
SMR RATING
1..100
6871
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4446
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
3784
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
9020

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

FVCB's Valuation (70) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as SFNC (90) in the Major Banks industry. This means that FVCB’s stock grew similarly to SFNC’s over the last 12 months.

FVCB's Profit vs Risk Rating (78) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as SFNC (100) in the Major Banks industry. This means that FVCB’s stock grew similarly to SFNC’s over the last 12 months.

FVCB's SMR Rating (68) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as SFNC (71) in the Major Banks industry. This means that FVCB’s stock grew similarly to SFNC’s over the last 12 months.

FVCB's Price Growth Rating (44) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as SFNC (46) in the Major Banks industry. This means that FVCB’s stock grew similarly to SFNC’s over the last 12 months.

FVCB's P/E Growth Rating (37) in the Regional Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for SFNC (84) in the Major Banks industry. This means that FVCB’s stock grew somewhat faster than SFNC’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FVCBSFNC
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
69%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
76%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
56%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
68%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
69%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
60%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
68%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
60%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
64%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
68%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
61%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
56%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
65%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
60%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 26 days ago
57%
Bearish Trend 22 days ago
70%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
67%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
71%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
56%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
51%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
FVCB
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
SFNC
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
PLSAX35.61N/A
N/A
Principal Large Cap S&P 500 Index A
MGOYX14.55N/A
N/A
Victory Mid-Cap Core Growth Y
RRRSX23.66N/A
N/A
DWS RREEF Real Estate Securities R
ONERX85.23N/A
N/A
One Rock
DUSQX40.96-0.13
-0.32%
DFA US Large Cap Equity Institutional

FVCB and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FVCB has been closely correlated with CBAN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 74% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FVCB jumps, then CBAN could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FVCB
1D Price
Change %
FVCB100%
+1.32%
CBAN - FVCB
74%
Closely correlated
+0.73%
BY - FVCB
72%
Closely correlated
+0.94%
UVSP - FVCB
72%
Closely correlated
+1.18%
FRME - FVCB
71%
Closely correlated
+1.13%
THFF - FVCB
71%
Closely correlated
+1.48%
More