Ad is loading...
FVCSX vs JVMCX
FVCSX vs JVMCX Comparison
Open Charts FVCSX vs JVMCX
Fidelity Advisor Value Strategies C
Price$32.02
Change+$1.21 (+3.93%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.67B
JHancock Disciplined Value Mid Cap C
Price$25.78
Change+$0.82 (+3.29%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets20.89B
FVCSX vs JVMCX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FVCSX vs. JVMCX commentary
May 13, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FVCSX is a Buy and JVMCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
JVMCX has more cash in the bank: 20.9B vs. FVCSX (1.67B). FVCSX pays higher dividends than JVMCX: FVCSX (0.50) vs JVMCX (0.00). FVCSX was incepted earlier than JVMCX: FVCSX (24 years) vs JVMCX (14 years). JVMCX (1.88) and FVCSX (1.84) have similar cost to investors . FVCSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 61.00 vs. JVMCX (47.00). FVCSX has a lower initial minimum investment than JVMCX: FVCSX (0) vs JVMCX (1000). JVMCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -9.20 vs. FVCSX (-19.52). FVCSX return over 5 years is better than : 67.08 vs. JVMCX (60.23).
| FVCSX | JVMCX | FVCSX / JVMCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.84 | 1.87 | 98% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.84 | 1.88 | 98% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -9.169 | -1.344 | 682% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.67B | 20.9B | 8% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.50 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -19.52 | -9.20 | 212% |
| Returns for 3 years | -5.73 | 2.61 | -220% |
| Returns for 5 years | 67.08 | 60.23 | 111% |
| Returns for 10 years | -16.66 | 20.37 | -82% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...