Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FVFRX vs SSGSX
FVFRX vs SSGSX Comparison
Open Charts FVFRX vs SSGSX
Franklin Small Cap Value R
Price$58.49
Change-$0.04 (-0.07%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets3.93B
Victory Sycamore Small Company Opp A
Price$47.18
Change-$0.11 (-0.23%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets5.63B
FVFRX vs SSGSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FVFRX vs. SSGSX commentary
Aug 30, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FVFRX is a StrongBuy and SSGSX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SSGSX has more cash in the bank: 5.63B vs. FVFRX (3.93B). FVFRX pays higher dividends than SSGSX: FVFRX (0.60) vs SSGSX (0.50). FVFRX was incepted earlier than SSGSX: FVFRX (23 years) vs SSGSX (26 years). SSGSX (1.26) and FVFRX (1.23) have similar cost to investors . FVFRX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 59.68 vs. SSGSX (37.00). FVFRX has a lower initial minimum investment than SSGSX: FVFRX (1000) vs SSGSX (2500). FVFRX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 0.52 vs. SSGSX (-3.93). FVFRX return over 5 years is better than : 38.69 vs. SSGSX (20.68).
| FVFRX | SSGSX | FVFRX / SSGSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.22 | 1.26 | 97% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.23 | 1.26 | 98% |
| Fund Existence | 23 years | 26 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.033 | 1.852 | 326% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 2500 | 40% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 3.93B | 5.63B | 70% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.60 | 0.50 | 121% |
| Returns for 1 year | 0.52 | -3.93 | -13% |
| Returns for 3 years | 18.07 | -0.85 | -2,132% |
| Returns for 5 years | 38.69 | 20.68 | 187% |
| Returns for 10 years | 18.17 | 24.03 | 76% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers