Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FVIFX vs JVMCX
FVIFX vs JVMCX Comparison
Open Charts FVIFX vs JVMCX
Fidelity Advisor Value I
Price$34.00
Change-$0.47 (-1.36%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets328.26M
JHancock Disciplined Value Mid Cap C
Price$25.82
Change-$0.30 (-1.15%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets21.46B
FVIFX vs JVMCX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FVIFX vs. JVMCX commentary
Jun 15, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FVIFX is a Buy and JVMCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
JVMCX has more cash in the bank: 21.5B vs. FVIFX (328M). FVIFX pays higher dividends than JVMCX: FVIFX (0.97) vs JVMCX (0.00). FVIFX was incepted earlier than JVMCX: FVIFX (21 years) vs JVMCX (14 years). JVMCX (1.88) is less costly to investors than FVIFX (0.92). FVIFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 80.00 vs. JVMCX (47.00). FVIFX has a lower initial minimum investment than JVMCX: FVIFX (0) vs JVMCX (1000). JVMCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -4.44 vs. FVIFX (-7.44). FVIFX return over 5 years is better than : 90.39 vs. JVMCX (45.41).
| FVIFX | JVMCX | FVIFX / JVMCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.90 | 1.87 | 48% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.92 | 1.88 | 49% |
| Fund Existence | 21 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -2.996 | 2.055 | -146% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 328M | 21.5B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.97 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -7.44 | -4.44 | 167% |
| Returns for 3 years | 18.14 | 13.31 | 136% |
| Returns for 5 years | 90.39 | 45.41 | 199% |
| Returns for 10 years | 52.65 | 25.18 | 209% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers