Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FWCGX vs WIMVX
FWCGX vs WIMVX Comparison
Open Charts FWCGX vs WIMVX
FWCGX vs WIMVX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FWCGX vs. WIMVX commentary
Sep 18, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FWCGX is a Hold and WIMVX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FWCGX has more cash in the bank: 158B vs. WIMVX (34.6M). FWCGX pays higher dividends than WIMVX: FWCGX (1.57) vs WIMVX (0.26). FWCGX was incepted earlier than WIMVX: FWCGX (6 years) vs WIMVX (19 years). WIMVX (1.58) is less costly to investors than FWCGX (0.46). FWCGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 44.00 vs. WIMVX (22.00). FWCGX has a lower initial minimum investment than WIMVX: FWCGX (250) vs WIMVX (250000). FWCGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 11.00 vs. WIMVX (7.77). FWCGX return over 5 years is better than : 38.22 vs. WIMVX (22.50).
| FWCGX | WIMVX | FWCGX / WIMVX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.46 | 0.78 | 59% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.46 | 1.58 | 29% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 19 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 15.487 | 13.264 | 117% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 250000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 158B | 34.6M | 456,647% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.57 | 0.26 | 609% |
| Returns for 1 year | 11.00 | 7.77 | 142% |
| Returns for 3 years | 51.98 | 37.23 | 140% |
| Returns for 5 years | 38.22 | 22.50 | 170% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 48.30 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement