Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FWD vs GBUY
FWD vs GBUY Comparison
Open Charts FWD vs GBUY
AB Disruptors ETF
Price$83.83
Change+$0.61 (+0.73%)
Volume$41.84K
Net Assets695.74M
Goldman Sachs Future Consumer Equity ETF
Price$36.45
Change+$0.38 (+1.05%)
Volume$1.55K
Net Assets17.22M
FWD vs GBUY Comparison Chart
Loading...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FWD vs. GBUY commentary
Jun 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FWD is a Hold and GBUY is a StrongBuy.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FWD has more net assets: 696M vs. GBUY (17.2M). FWD has a higher annual dividend yield than GBUY: FWD (5.859) vs GBUY (3.622). FWD was incepted earlier than GBUY: FWD (2 years) vs GBUY (4 years). FWD (0.65) has a lower expense ratio than GBUY (0.75). FWD has a higher turnover GBUY (31.00) vs GBUY (31.00).
| FWD | GBUY | FWD / GBUY | |
| Gain YTD | 5.859 | 3.622 | 162% |
| Net Assets | 696M | 17.2M | 4,047% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.65 | 0.75 | 87% |
| Turnover | 163.00 | 31.00 | 526% |
| Yield | 0.00 | 1.32 | - |
| Fund Existence | 2 years | 4 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| FWD | |
|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 79% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 70% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | N/A |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 74% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 87% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 88% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 90% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 8 days ago 72% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 89% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 90% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
FWD and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FWD has been closely correlated with APH. These tickers have moved in lockstep 82% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FWD jumps, then APH could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FWD | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FWD | 100% | +0.73% | ||
| APH - FWD | 82% Closely correlated | +0.91% | ||
| LITE - FWD | 79% Closely correlated | -0.22% | ||
| KLAC - FWD | 79% Closely correlated | +2.03% | ||
| LRCX - FWD | 78% Closely correlated | +1.70% | ||
| ARM - FWD | 77% Closely correlated | +2.75% | ||
More | ||||