Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FWD vs GBUY
FWD vs GBUY Comparison
Open Charts FWD vs GBUY
AB Disruptors ETF
Price$92.23
Change+$0.52 (+0.57%)
Volume$137
Net Assets863.64M
Goldman Sachs Future Consumer Equity ETF
Price$37.89
Change+$0.11 (+0.29%)
Volume$10.19K
Net Assets17.99M
FWD vs GBUY Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FWD vs. GBUY commentary
Jul 26, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FWD is a Buy and GBUY is a Buy.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FWD has more net assets: 864M vs. GBUY (18M). FWD has a higher annual dividend yield than GBUY: FWD (15.817) vs GBUY (7.716). FWD was incepted earlier than GBUY: FWD (2 years) vs GBUY (4 years). FWD (0.65) has a lower expense ratio than GBUY (0.75). FWD has a higher turnover GBUY (31.00) vs GBUY (31.00).
| FWD | GBUY | FWD / GBUY | |
| Gain YTD | 15.817 | 7.716 | 205% |
| Net Assets | 864M | 18M | 4,800% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.65 | 0.75 | 87% |
| Turnover | 163.00 | 31.00 | 526% |
| Yield | 0.00 | 1.24 | - |
| Fund Existence | 2 years | 4 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| FWD | GBUY | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 61% | 2 days ago 83% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 77% | 2 days ago 82% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 83% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 75% | 2 days ago 76% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 88% | 2 days ago 83% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 89% | 2 days ago 85% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 10 days ago 84% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 72% | N/A |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 85% | 2 days ago 81% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 77% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
FWD and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FWD has been closely correlated with APH. These tickers have moved in lockstep 82% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FWD jumps, then APH could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FWD | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FWD | 100% | +0.03% | ||
| APH - FWD | 82% Closely correlated | +3.72% | ||
| LITE - FWD | 80% Closely correlated | +0.70% | ||
| JCI - FWD | 78% Closely correlated | -0.10% | ||
| LRCX - FWD | 78% Closely correlated | +0.70% | ||
| KLAC - FWD | 78% Closely correlated | +0.79% | ||
More | ||||
GBUY and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, GBUY has been closely correlated with MRVL. These tickers have moved in lockstep 69% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if GBUY jumps, then MRVL could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To GBUY | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| GBUY | 100% | N/A | ||
| MRVL - GBUY | 69% Closely correlated | +1.05% | ||
| AMZN - GBUY | 66% Loosely correlated | +1.73% | ||
| HOOD - GBUY | 65% Loosely correlated | -0.15% | ||
| BLK - GBUY | 57% Loosely correlated | -0.18% | ||
| AMD - GBUY | 57% Loosely correlated | +2.19% | ||
More | ||||