Ad is loading...
FWD vs GBUY
FWD vs GBUY Comparison
Open Charts FWD vs GBUY
AB Disruptors ETF
Price$86.91
Change-$0.09 (-0.10%)
Volume$108
Net Assets567.33M
Goldman Sachs Future Consumer Equity ETF
Price$36.15
Change+$0.01 (+0.03%)
Volume$376
Net Assets35.93M
FWD vs GBUY Comparison Chart
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FWD vs. GBUY commentary
Jan 24, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FWD is a Hold and GBUY is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FWD has more net assets: 567M vs. GBUY (35.9M). FWD has a higher annual dividend yield than GBUY: FWD (9.862) vs GBUY (2.732). FWD was incepted earlier than GBUY: FWD (2 years) vs GBUY (3 years). FWD has a higher turnover GBUY (16.00) vs GBUY (16.00).
| FWD | GBUY | FWD / GBUY | |
| Gain YTD | 9.862 | 2.732 | 361% |
| Net Assets | 567M | 35.9M | 1,579% |
| Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Turnover | 90.00 | 16.00 | 563% |
| Yield | N/A | 0.40 | - |
| Fund Existence | 2 years | 3 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| FWD | GBUY | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 16 days ago 73% | 16 days ago 76% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 16 days ago 88% | 16 days ago 67% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 16 days ago 89% | 16 days ago 85% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 16 days ago 64% | 16 days ago 81% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 18 days ago 90% | 18 days ago 85% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 16 days ago 68% | 16 days ago 82% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
FWD and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FWD has been closely correlated with LRCX. These tickers have moved in lockstep 78% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FWD jumps, then LRCX could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FWD | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FWD | 100% | +1.48% | ||
| LRCX - FWD | 78% Closely correlated | +2.15% | ||
| AMAT - FWD | 76% Closely correlated | +1.37% | ||
| ASML - FWD | 75% Closely correlated | +0.49% | ||
| MPWR - FWD | 73% Closely correlated | +7.98% | ||
| ONTO - FWD | 72% Closely correlated | +2.20% | ||
More | ||||
GBUY and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, GBUY has been loosely correlated with AMZN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 66% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if GBUY jumps, then AMZN could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To GBUY | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| GBUY | 100% | +0.56% | ||
| AMZN - GBUY | 66% Loosely correlated | +1.86% | ||
| BLK - GBUY | 57% Loosely correlated | -0.57% | ||
| AMD - GBUY | 57% Loosely correlated | +1.20% | ||
| META - GBUY | 56% Loosely correlated | +1.14% | ||
| TER - GBUY | 54% Loosely correlated | +1.89% | ||
More | ||||