Ad is loading...
FWD vs GBUY
FWD vs GBUY Comparison
Open Charts FWD vs GBUY
AB Disruptors ETF
Price$71.86
Change+$2.68 (+3.87%)
Volume$20.2K
Net Assets564.78M
Goldman Sachs Future Consumer Equity ETF
Price$32.02
Change+$0.40 (+1.27%)
Volume$1.27K
Net Assets16.08M
FWD vs GBUY Comparison Chart
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FWD vs. GBUY commentary
Apr 25, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FWD is a StrongBuy and GBUY is a StrongBuy.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FWD has more net assets: 565M vs. GBUY (16.1M). GBUY (-8.983) and FWD (-9.256) have matching annual dividend yield . FWD was incepted earlier than GBUY: FWD (2 years) vs GBUY (3 years). FWD (0.65) has a lower expense ratio than GBUY (0.75). FWD has a higher turnover GBUY (31.00) vs GBUY (31.00).
| FWD | GBUY | FWD / GBUY | |
| Gain YTD | -9.256 | -8.983 | 103% |
| Net Assets | 565M | 16.1M | 3,509% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.65 | 0.75 | 87% |
| Turnover | 163.00 | 31.00 | 526% |
| Yield | 0.00 | 1.42 | - |
| Fund Existence | 2 years | 3 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| FWD | GBUY | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 80% | 12 days ago 78% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 79% | 12 days ago 77% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 86% | 12 days ago 88% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 89% | 12 days ago 84% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 86% | 12 days ago 84% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 72% | 12 days ago 82% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 90% | 12 days ago 85% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 22 days ago 71% | 18 days ago 81% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 90% | 12 days ago 85% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 74% | 12 days ago 85% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
FWD and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FWD has been closely correlated with APH. These tickers have moved in lockstep 82% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FWD jumps, then APH could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FWD | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FWD | 100% | +3.87% | ||
| APH - FWD | 82% Closely correlated | +6.86% | ||
| KLAC - FWD | 79% Closely correlated | +4.92% | ||
| SNPS - FWD | 78% Closely correlated | +3.95% | ||
| LRCX - FWD | 78% Closely correlated | +6.25% | ||
| LITE - FWD | 78% Closely correlated | +6.53% | ||
More | ||||
GBUY and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, GBUY has been closely correlated with MRVL. These tickers have moved in lockstep 70% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if GBUY jumps, then MRVL could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To GBUY | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| GBUY | 100% | N/A | ||
| MRVL - GBUY | 70% Closely correlated | +6.62% | ||
| AMZN - GBUY | 66% Loosely correlated | +3.29% | ||
| HOOD - GBUY | 64% Loosely correlated | +7.81% | ||
| BLK - GBUY | 57% Loosely correlated | +2.66% | ||
| AMD - GBUY | 57% Loosely correlated | +4.51% | ||
More | ||||