Ad is loading...
Ad is loading...
FWD vs GBUY
FWD vs GBUY Comparison
Open Charts FWD vs GBUY
AB Disruptors ETF
Price$83.53
Change+$0.09 (+0.11%)
Volume$100
CapitalizationN/A
Goldman Sachs Future Consumer Equity ETF
Price$35.38
Change-$0.05 (-0.14%)
Volume$292
CapitalizationN/A
FWD vs GBUY Comparison Chart
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FWD vs. GBUY commentary
Nov 22, 2024
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FWD is a StrongBuy and GBUY is a StrongSell.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FWD has more net assets: 471M vs. GBUY (35.5M). FWD has a higher annual dividend yield than GBUY: FWD (33.827) vs GBUY (26.103). FWD was incepted earlier than GBUY: FWD (2 years) vs GBUY (3 years). FWD has a higher turnover GBUY (16.00) vs GBUY (16.00).
| FWD | GBUY | FWD / GBUY | |
| Gain YTD | 33.827 | 26.103 | 130% |
| Net Assets | 471M | 35.5M | 1,327% |
| Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Turnover | 90.00 | 16.00 | 563% |
| Yield | N/A | 0.40 | - |
| Fund Existence | 2 years | 3 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| FWD | GBUY | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 79% | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 61% | 2 days ago 84% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 71% | 2 days ago 83% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 73% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 89% | 2 days ago 81% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 87% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 4 days ago 85% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 8 days ago 68% | 8 days ago 81% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 77% | 2 days ago 82% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 85% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
FWD and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FWD has been closely correlated with LRCX. These tickers have moved in lockstep 78% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FWD jumps, then LRCX could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FWD | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FWD | 100% | +2.15% | ||
| LRCX - FWD | 78% Closely correlated | +4.40% | ||
| AMAT - FWD | 76% Closely correlated | +3.33% | ||
| ASML - FWD | 75% Closely correlated | +2.09% | ||
| MPWR - FWD | 73% Closely correlated | +2.22% | ||
| ONTO - FWD | 72% Closely correlated | +2.83% | ||
More | ||||
GBUY and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, GBUY has been loosely correlated with AMZN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 66% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if GBUY jumps, then AMZN could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To GBUY | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| GBUY | 100% | +0.25% | ||
| AMZN - GBUY | 66% Loosely correlated | -2.22% | ||
| BLK - GBUY | 57% Loosely correlated | +0.32% | ||
| AMD - GBUY | 57% Loosely correlated | -0.08% | ||
| META - GBUY | 56% Loosely correlated | -0.43% | ||
| TER - GBUY | 54% Loosely correlated | +1.87% | ||
More | ||||