Ad is loading...
FWD vs GBUY
FWD vs GBUY Comparison
Open Charts FWD vs GBUY
AB Disruptors ETF
Price$62.16
Change-$4.66 (-6.97%)
Volume$500
Net Assets548.4M
Goldman Sachs Future Consumer Equity ETF
Price$30.46
Change-$1.31 (-4.12%)
Volume$100
Net Assets16.72M
FWD vs GBUY Comparison Chart
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FWD vs. GBUY commentary
Apr 04, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FWD is a Hold and GBUY is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FWD has more net assets: 548M vs. GBUY (16.7M). GBUY has a higher annual dividend yield than FWD: GBUY (-9.679) vs FWD (-15.621). FWD was incepted earlier than GBUY: FWD (2 years) vs GBUY (3 years). FWD (0.65) has a lower expense ratio than GBUY (0.75). FWD has a higher turnover GBUY (31.00) vs GBUY (31.00).
| FWD | GBUY | FWD / GBUY | |
| Gain YTD | -15.621 | -9.679 | 161% |
| Net Assets | 548M | 16.7M | 3,281% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.65 | 0.75 | 87% |
| Turnover | 163.00 | 31.00 | 526% |
| Yield | 0.00 | 1.42 | - |
| Fund Existence | 2 years | 3 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| FWD | GBUY | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 78% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 83% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 83% | 2 days ago 74% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 67% | 2 days ago 84% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 73% | 2 days ago 80% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 69% | 2 days ago 82% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 90% | 3 days ago 86% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 71% | 5 days ago 81% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 87% | 2 days ago 90% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 72% | 2 days ago 85% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
FWD and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FWD has been closely correlated with LRCX. These tickers have moved in lockstep 78% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FWD jumps, then LRCX could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FWD | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FWD | 100% | -6.85% | ||
| LRCX - FWD | 78% Closely correlated | -11.60% | ||
| AMAT - FWD | 76% Closely correlated | -8.28% | ||
| ASML - FWD | 75% Closely correlated | -6.84% | ||
| MPWR - FWD | 73% Closely correlated | -15.57% | ||
| ONTO - FWD | 72% Closely correlated | -12.44% | ||
More | ||||
GBUY and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, GBUY has been loosely correlated with AMZN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 66% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if GBUY jumps, then AMZN could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To GBUY | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| GBUY | 100% | -4.85% | ||
| AMZN - GBUY | 66% Loosely correlated | -8.98% | ||
| BLK - GBUY | 57% Loosely correlated | -7.71% | ||
| AMD - GBUY | 57% Loosely correlated | -8.90% | ||
| META - GBUY | 56% Loosely correlated | -8.96% | ||
| TER - GBUY | 54% Loosely correlated | -10.20% | ||
More | ||||